Abstract

The paper deals with the results of the scientific discussion on the management of the complementary development of the adjacent territories to river freight. The main purpose is to substantiate the nature and directions of implementing the river transport potential in the country’s logistics system by applying the concept of complementary development of the economy of port regions, focusing on the development of river ports as nodes of the country’s logistics system. The relevance of the study is that the factors of radical growth of demand for inland waterway transportation from businesses and the state require a corresponding reorientation of logistics for many sectors of the economy, especially from the riparian territories. The research of the problems of river freight transportation сoncerning dimensional and functional economy restructuring of Ukraine’s regions within logistics concept is carried out in the following logical sequence: the evaluation of the ability of river transport to form a direct and multiplicative effect of logistics, generated by gross regional product and export processes in the country’s port regions; clustering of areas adjacent to river ports based on development potential (Gross Regional Product and exports); confirmation of the division of regions according to the mathematical algorithm of hierarchical clustering of adjacent regions; the evaluation of investment attractiveness of the country’s port regions; managing the intensification of the impact of river transport for the development of surrounding areas; the evaluation of the potential of multiplier effect at the system of management of the river ports complementary development. The mathematical algorithm of hierarchical clustering of port regions using the SPSS software system and the heuristic approach to their structure (by author’s method of forming clusters based on the contribution of river transport to the formation of the direct and multiplicative effect of logistics: formed GRP and export processes in the port regions of the country). The subject of the study is the port regions. The evaluation results of the contribution of river freight transport for the economy of the adjacent territories conducted based on regression analysis and analysis of the intensity of river transport use during 2007-2016 period, showed that river transport is not a market-forming factor of development of the adjacent territories. The results of the study can be useful for the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine, Ministry of Economic Development, Trade and Agriculture of Ukraine, administration of river ports, logistics operators, business in port regions, other participants of the market of water transportation in the process of prioritization of the goals of combined freight transportation

Keywords: logistics, regional development, river transport, port regions, territorial structure of Ukrainian, complementary development

JEL Classification: R40, R41, R49.

Cite as: Krykavskyy, Y., Prokopenko, O., Shandrivska, O., Vasyltsiv, N., & Nycz-Wojtan, S. (2020). Innovations in management of the complementary development of the territories adjusted to the river cargo transportation. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 257-275. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2020.3-19

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Ceniga, P. & Sukalova, V. (2019). Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics in Slovakia. Transport Means 2019: Proceedings of the 23rd International Scientific Conference, Kaunas University of Technology, Lithuania, 2, 192 – 200
2. Chen, X., & Jiang, H. (2013). Analysis of the Economic Benefit of the Inland River’s Shipping Centre. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 96, 625-632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
3. Document of The World Bank (2016). International Development Association. Retrieved from http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/955651466671969590/text/P154511-BD-Regional-Waterway-Transport-Project-1-PAD-FINAL-to-SECPO-2016-05-25.txt
4. Głowny Urzad Statystyczny (2017). Transport wodny srodladowy w Polsce w 2016 r.Retrieved from https://stat.gov.pl/files/gfx/portalinformacyjny/pl/defaultaktualnosci/5511/4/7/1/transport_wodny_srodladowy_w_polsce_w_2016_roku.pdf
5. Haddad, E. A., Hewings, G. J., Perobelli, F. S., & dos Santos, R. A. (2010). Regional effects of port infrastructure: a spatial CGE application to Brazil. International Regional Science Review, 33(3), 239-263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
6. Hann, M., Piotrowski, L., & Wos, K. (2014). Adaptation of the Oder River for the purposes of inland water transport. Logistyka, 6, 13313-13321. [Google Scholar]
7. Hunke, K., & Prause, G. (2013). Management of green corridor performance. Transport and Telecommunication Journal, 14(4), 292-299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
8. Ionescu, R. V. (2016). Inland waterways’ importance for the European economy. Case study: Romanian inland Waterways transport. Journal of Danubian Studies and Research, 6(2). [Google Scholar]
9. ITF-OECD. (2016). Logistics Development Strategies and Performance Measurement International Transport Forum.. Retrieved from https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/logistics-strategy-performance-management.pdf.
10. Krykavskyi, Y., Shandrivska, O., & Wysocki, M. (2017). Investigation of strategic perspectives of development of river ports in Ukraine. Technology audit and production reserves, 6(4 (38)), 8-16. [Google Scholar]
11. Madani, S. (2018). Global Seaport Competitiveness: A Resource Management Perspective (Doctoral dissertation, RMIT University). [Google Scholar]
12. Nam, K., & Win, E. (2014). Competitiveness between road and inland water transport: the case of Myanmar. Transport Problems, 9. [Google Scholar]
13. Official site of the State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/.
14. Prause, G. (2014). A green corridor balanced scorecard. Transport and Telecommunication Journal, 15(4), 299-307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
15. Prause, G., & Hoffmann, T. (2017). Cooperative Business Structures for Green Transport Corridors. Baltic Journal of European Studies, 7(2), 3-27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
16. Prokopenko, O. V., & Shkola, V. Yu. (2012). Controlling of the ecological and economic enterprise security on the bases of ecomarketing. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 337-346. Retrieved from http://mmi.fem.sumdu.edu.ua/en/journals/2012/4/337-346
17. Prokopenko, O. V., Shkola, V. Yu, Domashenko, M. D., & Prokopenko, M. O. (2015). Conceptual grounds to form motivational constituent of the international ecological policy. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 245-259. Retrieved from http://mmi.fem.sumdu.edu.ua/en/journals/2015/4/245-259
18. Prokopenko, O., Omelyanenko, V., & Tirto, T. (2019). Security issues of system innovation strategies. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 65, p. 03006). EDP Sciences. [Google Scholar]
19. Rydzkowski, W., & Rolbiecki, R. (2005). Mozliwosci rozwoju portow srodladowych w Polsce jako centrow logistycznych. LogForum, 1(2), 1-10. [Google Scholar]
20. Schonfelder, S., Streicher, G., Gille, J., & Trosky, F. (2015). Employment Effects of Increased Inland Waterway Transport in the Danube Region (No. 497). WIFO working papers. [Google Scholar]
21. Shkola, V. Y., & Shcherbachenko, V. A. (2011). Conceptual bases of the government regulation migratory processes on base macroeconomic forecasting. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 237-241. Retrieved from http://mmi.fem.sumdu.edu.ua/en/journals/2011/4_2/237-241
22. Weijun Fe. (May, 2011). Using More Inland Rivers in Intermodal Transport (Final Report). APEC Transportation Working Group. Retrieved from https://www.apec.org/Publications/2011/05/Using-More-Inland-Rivers-in-Intermodal-Transport
23. Wiegmans, B., & Konings, R. (2015). Intermodal inland waterway transport: Modelling conditions influencing its cost competitiveness. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 31(2), 273-294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]