Contents |
Authors:
Jiri Mezulanik, University of Business and Law (Czech Republic) Lubomir Kmeco, University College of Business in Prague (Czech Republic) Mehmet Civelek, Tomas Bata University in Zlin (Czech Republic) Jirka Kloudova, University of Entrepreneurship and Law (Czech Republic)
Pages: 118-130
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.2-11
Download: |
Views: |
Downloads: |
|
|
|
Abstract
This research deals with the arguments within the scientific discussion on the issue of shared economy in the field of passenger transport in the Czech Republic. The main purpose of the research is to compare some ridesharing platforms, namely, Uber, Liftago and Taxify and traditional taxi services regarding their starting rates and a characteristic of the cars that they use. Investigation of the topic shows that starting rates and quality of services of these platforms differ regarding the locations and ride-hailing services. Therefore, analysing various sharing economy platforms in the Czech Republic regarding transportation and finding differences among them might create value addition for sharing economy literature. In this regard, this paper applies a research technique that consists of interviews and direct observation in the provision of transport services. In the research, a primary survey was carried out; In terms of secrecy, scenarios of interviews and cover-stories were prepared to motivate respondents to more open communication. Respondents were providers of transport services in the form of classic taxis, Uber, Liftago and Taxify, the most important providers of passenger taxis in the monitored cities. The research was carried out in 2017/2018 in different cities of the Czech Republic, namely, Prague and Ostrava. The obtained data were processed in the SPSS IBM Statistics program using the methods of descriptive statistics. The results of the research show that in the analysed parameters, the ride-hailing platforms do not provide cheaper services in the monitored markets and that their prices are comparable to those of traditional providers. For this reason, travellers, users and providers of ride-hailing services can benefit from this study by considering the differences that this research proves.
Keywords: platform economy, ride-hailing, ridesharing, ride-sourcing, sharing economy, transportation industry, Uber.
JEL Classification: L91, M21, O18, P25.
Cite as: Mezulanik, J., Kmeco, L., Civelek, M. & Kloudova, J. (2019). Transport services in the shared economy segment compared to traditional taxi services: the case study of the Czech Republic. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 118-130. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.2-11
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
- Alizadeh, T., Farid, Z. & Sarkar, S. (2018): Towards Understanding the Socio-Economic Patterns of Sharing Economy in Australia: An Investigation of Airbnb Listings in Sydney and Melbourne Metropolitan Regions. Urban Policy and Research, DOI: 10.1080/08111146.2018.1460269.
- American Public Transportation Association (2016). Shared Mobility And The Transformation Of Public Transit. Report, American Public Transportation Association. Retrieved from https://www.apta.com/resources/reportsandpublications/ Documents/APTA-Shared-Mobility.pdf, Accessed date: 17.03.2019.
- Asirin, A. & Azhari, D. (2018). Ride-Sharing Business Model For Sustainability In Developing Country: Case Study Nebengers, Indonesia, The 4th Plano Cosmo International Conference. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 158.
- Belk, R. (2014). You Are What You Can Access: Sharing And Collaborative Consumption Online. Journal of Business Research, 67, 1595-1600.
- Chang, H. H. (2017). The economic effects of Uber on taxi drivers in Taiwan. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 13(3), 475-500.
- Cheng, M. (2016). Sharing economy: A Review And Agenda For Future Research. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 57, 60-70.
- Cheng, X., Fu, S., & Vreede, G.D. (2018). A mixed method investigation of sharing economy driven car-hailing services: Online and offline perspectives. Int J. Information Management, 41, 57-64.
- Davidson, N.M., & Infranca, J.J. (2016). The Sharing Economy As An Urban Phenomenon. Yale Law And Policy Review, 34 (215), 215-279.
- de Souza Silva, L.A., de Andrade, M. O. & Maia, M. L. A. (2018). How Does The Ride-Hailing Systems Demand Affect İndividual Transport Regulation? Research in Transportation Economics, 69, 600-606.
- Egan, M., Schaefer, M., Jakob, M. & Oren, N. (2015). A Double Auction Mechanism for On-Demand Transport Prima Conference: International Conference on Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems, Networks. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25524-8_38
- Egan, M., Drchal, J., Mrkos, J., & Jakob, M. (2018). Towards Data-Driven On-Demand Transport. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Industrial Networks and Intelligent Systems, 5(14), 1-10.
- Gargiulo, E., Giannantonio, R., Guercio, E., Borean, C., & Zenezini, G. (2015). Dynamic Ride Sharing Service : Are Users Ready To Adopt It? Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 777-784. http://DOI.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.329.
- Greenwood, B. N., & Wattal, S. (2017). Show Me the Way to Go Home: An Empirical Investigation of Ride Sharing and Alcohol Related Motor Vehicle. Homicide. MIS Quarterly, 41, 163-188.
- Hall, J. D., Palsson, C. & Price, J. (2017). Is Uber A Substitute Or Complement For Public Transit?, Working Papers tecipa-585, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
- Henao, A. (2017). Impacts Of Ridesourcing – Lyft And Uber – On Transportation Including VMT, Mode Replacement, Parking, And Travel Behavior. (PhD Thesis), U.S: University of Colorado.
- Jin, S. T., Kong, H., Wu, B., & Sui, D. Z. (2018). Ridesourcing, The Sharing Economy, And The Future Of Cities. Cities, 76, 96-104.
- Kljucnikov, A., Popesko, B. & Kloudova, J. (2019). Economics Of The International Ridesharing Services – A Trap For Amateurs. Entrepreneurship And Sustainability Issues, 6(3), http://DOI.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.3(8).
- Kljucnikov, A., Krajcik, V., Vincurova, Z. (2018). International Sharing Economy: the Case of AirBnB in the Czech Republic. Economics and Sociology, 11(2), 126-137. DOI:10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-2/
- Melo, S., Macedo, J. & Baptista, P. (2019). Capacity-Sharing In Logistics Solutions: A New Pathway Towards Sustainability. Transport Policy, 73, 143-151.
- Murphy, C., & Felgon, S. (2016). Shared Mobility and the Transformation of Public Transit. Report submitted by the Shared-Use Mobility Center (SUMC) for the American Public Transportation Association. 39 p.
- PWC, (2015). Consumer Intelligence Series: The Sharing Economy. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.fr/fr/assets/files/pdf/2015/05/pwc_etude_sharing_economy.pdf Accessed: 17.03.2019
- Rayle, L., Dai, D., Chan, N., Cervero, R., & Shaheen, S. (2016). Just A Better Taxi? A Survey-Based Comparison Of Taxis, Transit, And Ridesourcing Services In San Francisco. Transport Policy, 45, 168-178.
- Rogers, B. (2015). The Social Cost Of Uber. Temple University Legal Studies, Research paper, no. 2015-28.
- Sharp, D. (2018). Sharing Cities for Urban Transformation: Narrative, Policy and Practice. Urban Policy and Research.
- Sun, L., Wang, S., Liu, S., Yao, L., Luo, W., & Shukla, A. (2018). A Completive Research On The Feasibility And Adaptation Of Shared Transportation In Mega-Cities – A case study in Beijing. Applied Energy, 230, 1014-1033.
- Schwieterman, J. P., & Pelon, M. (2017). First Zipcar, Now Uber: Legal And Policy Issues Facing The Expanding «Shared Mobility»Sector In U.S. Cities. Belmont law review, 4, 109-137.
- Schwieterman, J., & Smith (2018). Sharing The Ride: A Paired-Trip Analysis Of Uberpool And Chicago Transit Authority Services In Chicago, Illinois. Research in Transportation Economics, 71, 9–16.
- Stalmasekova, N., Genzorova, T., Corejovaa, T. & Gasperova, L. (2017). The Impact Of Using The Digital Environment In Transport. TRANSCOM 2017: International scientific conference on sustainable, modern and safe transport. Procedia Engineering, 192, 231-236, DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.06.040.
- Stuchlý, J. & Suta, M. (2019). Participation In The Sharing Economy In The Czech Republic. SHS Web of Conferences 61, 01025. https://DOI.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196101025.
- Tussyadiah, I. P. & Pesonen, J. (2015). Impacts of Peer-to-Peer Accommodation Use on Travel Patterns. Journal of Travel Research. DOI: 10.1177/0047287515608505.
- Velychko, O., & Velychko, L. (2017). Logistical modelling of managerial decisions in social and marketing business systems. Journal of International Studies, 10(3), 206-219. DOI:10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-3/15
- Young, M., & Farber, S. (2019). The Who, Why, And When Of Uber And Other Ride-Hailing Trips: An Examination Of A Large Sample Household Travel Survey. Transportation Research Part A, 119, 383-392.
- Zervas, G., Proserpio, D. & Byers, J. W. (2017). The Rise of the Sharing Economy: Estimating the Impact of Airbnb on the Hotel Industry. Journal of Marketing Research. Vol. LIV, 687-705. DOI: 10.1509/jmr.15.0204
- Zhang, T. C., Jahromi, M. F. & KizildagM. (2018). Value Co-Creation İn A Sharing Economy: The End Of Price Wars? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 71, 51-58.
- Zhang, T., Bufquin, D. & Lu, C. (2019). A Qualitative İnvestigation Of Microentrepreneurship İn The Sharing Economy. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 79, 148-157.
- Zuo, W.M., & Chen, H.Q., 2017. Service innovation in the sharing economy environment: a TRIZ perspective. Nankai Bus. Rev., 20 (5), 175-184.
- Zuo, W., Zhu, W., Chen, S., & He, X. (2019). Service quality management of online car-hailing based on PCN in the sharing economy Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 34.
|