Abstract

The negative effect of income inequality on economic growth represents a topic that constitutes a broad topic of research in the standard economic theory. One of the immediate consequences of income inequality is diminished consumption. Many «poor» customers cannot provide sufficient demand for the producers, causing overproduction that might lead to an economic crisis. It constitutes a problem because sustainable economic performance needs to be achieved under the conditions of income inequality. Reducing social and economic inequality in countries is an essential step towards ensuring that no one is left behind. It is also part of the 10th Sustainable Development Goal aimed to reduce it by 2030. Inequality is based on the income distribution between the top 1% and the bottom 99% of households in any given country. The degree of inequality could play a beneficial role if it is driven by market forces and is associated with incentives to increase growth. In developing and emerging countries, greater equality and improvements in living standards are needed to enable populations to flourish. Inequality reduction is one of the most critical steps a government could take to improve the well-being of its population. The income inequality growth increases human capital in poor countries and reduces it in high and middle-income countries. In poorer countries, it increases them, but in higher – and middle-income countries, it reduces them. Income inequality could be reduced by improving human capital and general skill levels, correcting labor-market policies, and making better use of financial services. In turn, sustainable economic growth could reverse the negative effects of inequality, reducing the need for high-wage and higher-earning households. Thus, it provides higher economic growth. This paper discusses three ways to circumvent the impact of decreasing consumption on economic growth adopted in developing economies over the last fifty years, such as increasing exports, providing loans for consumption, and printing new money. The findings showed that none of these methods seem to be sustainable in the long run. Thus novel and innovative mechanisms that would allow our economy to reduce inequality are necessary and need to be put into place.

Keywords: income inequality, innovations, economic growth, sustainable management.

JEL Classification: F41, O30, O47.

Cite as: Cabelkova, I., Tvaronaviciene, M., & Strielkowski, W. (2021). Innovations in achieving sustainable economic performance under income inequality. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 146-154. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2021.2-12

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Abakumova, J., & Primierova, O. (2018). Globalization, growth and inequality: testing causality and asymmetries. Ekonomicko-manazerske spektrum, 12(2), 83-95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
2. Abduvaliev, M., & Bustillo, R. (2020). Impact of remittances on economic growth and poverty reduction amongst CIS countries. Post-Communist Economies, 32(4), 525-546. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
3. Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1996). Income distribution, political instability, and investment. European economic review, 40(6), 1203-1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
4. Alesina, A., & Rodrik, D. (1994). Distributive politics and economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 109(2), 465-490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
5. Benabou, R. (1996). Inequality and growth. NBER macroeconomics annual, 11, 11-74. [Google Scholar]
6. Berg, A., Ostry, J. D., Tsangarides, C. G., & Yakhshilikov, Y. (2018). Redistribution, inequality, and growth: new evidence. Journal of Economic Growth, 23(3), 259-305. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
7. Bertola, G. (1993). Factor shares and savings in endogenous growth. The American Economic Review, 1184-1198. Retrieved from [Link]
8. Crosby, M. (2012). Macroeconomic Policy: Demystifying Monetary and Fiscal Policy. The Economic Record, 88(281), 295-296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
9. Dogan, E., & Inglesi-Lotz, R. (2020). The impact of economic structure to the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis: evidence from European countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(11), 12717-12724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
10. Gomez-Lopez, M., Viejo, C., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2019). Psychological Well-Being during adolescence: Stability and association with romantic relationships. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
11. Grundler, K., & Scheuermeyer, P. (2015). Income inequality, economic growth, and the effect of redistribution (No. 95). WEP-Wurzburg Economic Papers. Retrieved from [Link]
12. Gruzina, Y., Firsova, I., & Strielkowski, W. (2021). Dynamics of Human Capital Development in Economic Development Cycles. Economies, 9(2), 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
13. Gunasinghe, C., Selvanathan, E. A., Naranpanawa, A., & Forster, J. (2020). The impact of fiscal shocks on real GDP and income inequality: What do Australian data say?. Journal of Policy Modeling, 42(2), 250-270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
14. Haini, H. (2020). Spatial spillover effects of public health and education expenditures on economic growth: Evidence from China’s provinces. Post-Communist Economies, 32(8), 1111-1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
15. Holman, R. (2011). Ekonomie, CH Beck. Retrieved from [Link]
16. Huh, H. S., & Park, C. Y. (2021). A new index of globalisation: Measuring impacts of integration on economic growth and income inequality. The World Economy, 44(2), 409-443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
17. Jafarzadeh, E., & Shuquan, H. (2019). The Impact of Income Inequality on the Economic Growth of Iran: An Empirical Analysis. Business Ethics and Leadership, 3(2), 53-62. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
18. Kalecki, M. (1942). Theory of Profits. Economic Journal, 52, 258–267. [CrossRef]
19. Kalecki, M. (1971). Class struggle and the distribution of national income. Kyklos, 24(1), 1-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
20. Keefer, P., & Knack, S. (2002). Polarization, politics and property rights: Links between inequality and growth. Public choice, 111(1), 127-154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
21. Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest, and money. Springer. [Google Scholar]
22. Khoshnava, S. M., Rostami, R., Zin, R. M., Štreimikienė, D., Yousefpour, A., Strielkowski, W., & Mardani, A. (2019). Aligning the criteria of green economy (GE) and sustainable development goals (SDGs) to implement sustainable development. Sustainability, 11(17), 4615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
23. Kollamparambil, U. (2020). Happiness, happiness inequality and income dynamics in South Africa. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(1), 201-222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
24. Krugman, P., Wells, R., & Graddy, K. (2007). Economics, European Edition. Macmillan. Retrieved from [Link]
25. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American Economic, 45 (1), 1–28. Retrieved from [Link]
26. Liao, T. F. (2021). Income Inequality, Social Comparison, and Happiness in the United States. Socius, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
27. Machacek, V., Strielkowski, W., Shishkin, A., & Bilan, Y. (2015). Determinants of innovations and competitiveness in the European Union. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 224-232. Retrieved from [Link]
28. Matallah, S. (2020). Public service delivery, corruption and inequality: key factors driving migration from North Africa to the developed world. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 22, 328-354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
29. Mikucka, M., Sarracino, F., & Dubrow, J. K. (2017). When does economic growth improve life satisfaction? Multilevel analysis of the roles of social trust and income inequality in 46 countries, 1981–2012. World Development, 93, 447-459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
30. Ota, T. (2017). Economic growth, income inequality and environment: assessing the applicability of the Kuznets hypotheses to Asia. Palgrave Communications, 3(1), 1-23. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
31. Palma, J. G. (2019). Behind the Seven Veils of Inequality. What if it’s all about the Struggle within just One Half of the Population over just One Half of the National Income?. Development and Change, 50(5), 1133-1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
32. Perotti, R. (1996). Growth, income distribution, and democracy: What the data say. Journal of Economic growth, 1(2), 149-187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
33. Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (1991). Is inequality harmful for growth? Theory and evidence (No. w3599). National Bureau of Economic Research. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
34. Philips, A. Q., Souza, F. D., & Whitten, G. D. (2020). Globalization and comparative compositional inequality. Political Science Research and Methods, 8(3), 509-525. [CrossRef]
35. Prawoto, N., & Basuki, A. T. (2020). The influence of macroeconomic variables, processing industry, and education services on economic growth in Indonesia. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(1), 1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
36. Reynolds, A. J., Ou, S. R., Mondi, C. F., & Giovanelli, A. (2019). Reducing poverty and inequality through preschool-to-third-grade prevention services. American Psychologist, 74(6), 653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
37. Richters, O., & Siemoneit, A. (2019). Growth imperatives: substantiating a contested concept. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 51, 126-137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
38. Rowthorn, R. (1982). Demand, real wages and economic growth. Studi Economici, 18(1), 53–54. Retrieved from [Link]
39. Schettino, F., Gabriele, A., & Khan, H. A. (2021). Polarization and the middle class in China: A non-parametric evaluation using CHNS and CHIP data. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 57, 251-264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
40. Schneider, D., & Harknett, K. (2019). Consequences of routine work-schedule instability for worker health and well-being. American Sociological Review, 84(1), 82-114. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
41. Shahrier, S., Kotani, K., & Saijo, T. (2017). Intergenerational sustainability dilemma and the degree of capitalism in societies: a field experiment (SPECIAL FEATURE: Sustainability Science and Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals). Sustainability science: official journal of the Integrated Research System for Sustainability Science, 12(6), 957-967. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
42. Strielkowski, W., & Höschle, F. (2016). Evidence for economic convergence in the EU: The analysis of past EU enlargements. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 22(4), 617-630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
43. Szczepaniak, M., & Geise, A. (2021). Examining the relationships between income inequalities and different dimensions of well-being in selected Central Eastern European (CEE) countries. Plos one, 16(4), e0250469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
44. Tridico, P., & Paternesi Meloni, W. (2018). Economic growth, welfare models and inequality in the context of globalisation. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 29(1), 118-139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
45. Vasconcelos, V. V. (2021). Social justice and sustainable regional development: Reflections on discourse and practice in public policies and public budget. Insights into Regional Development, 3(1), 10-28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
46. Wisman, J. D. (2017). Politics, not economics, ultimately drives inequality. Challenge, 60(4), 347-367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
47. Zhou, P., Chen, F., Wang, W., Song, P., & Zhu, C. (2019). Does the Development of Information and Communication Technology and Transportation Infrastructure Affect China’s Educational Inequality?. Sustainability, 11(9), 2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]