Abstract

In the insurance market, the use of digital technologies facilitating online transactions is increasing together with the diffusion of the so called comparison websites. Taking into account this fact, the first issue addressed by this article is the analysis of the process of digitalization of the distributional channels both in life and non-life sectors in the European countries. Given the use of different channels, such as brokers, agents and bancassurance, a particular role is played by the comparison website. The second issue is to look at the regulatory interventions at the European level. These interventions mainly promote the adoption of behaviours that ensure the correctness of the comparison and the transparency of the information made available to the public through online platform. In this direction, the author investigates particularly the Italian case and the intervention of the insurance supervisory Authority and of the national Antitrust Authority. Moreover, the article contribution to the literature is to examine the effects of the comparison website on market competition: the effects are described, on one hand, as positive in terms of decreasing asymmetric information suffered by the insured, on the other hand, as negative in terms of increasing the possibility of collusive behaviours by the insurance companies. To confirm this last point a decision by the Lithuanian Antitrust Authority, confirmed by the European Court of Justice, is quoted to show how an online platform can be an information exchange tool and its behaviour can be considered as a facilitating practice to support collusion. The purpose of the analysis proposed is to provide useful elements for the future regulatory interventions that will follow the diffusion of new distributional channels in the insurance market. Particularly, the growing diffusion of comparison websites will involve the adoption of regulatory instruments aimed not only at protecting consumers but also at limiting their use as tools for collusive behaviour.

Keywords: Insurance market, comparison websites, regulation, competition.

JEL Classification: G3, G18, G28.

Cite as: Porrini, D. (2018). The effects of innovation on market competition: the case of the insurance comparison websites. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 324-332. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2018.3-29

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Baranes E., Andrea Cosnita-Langlais A. (2016), The digital economy, a challenge to competition policies, special issue of Réalités Industrielles, August.
2. Brown J.R., Goolsbee A. (2002), Does the Internet Make Markets More Competitive? Evidence from the Life Insurance Industry, in Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 110, No. 3, pp. 481-507.
3. Competition & Markets Authority (2017), Digital Comparison Tools Market Study, London, 28th March.
4. EIOPA (2014), Report on Good Practices on Comparison Websites, CCPFI-13/100, 30 January.
5. European Commission (2015a), GREEN PAPER on retail financial services. Better products, more choice, and greater opportunities for consumers and businesses, Brussels, 12.10.2015, 630 final
6. European Commission (2015b), “Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions a digital single market strategy for Europe”, Brussels, 6.5.2015, 192 final.
7. European Court of Justice (2016), Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber), 21 January 2016.
8. Ezrachi A., Stucke M.E. (2015), Artificial Intelligence & Collusion: When Computers Inhibit Competition, The University of Oxford Centre for Competition Law and Policy, Working Paper CCLP (L) 40.
9. Insurance Europe (2017), Europe in Figure – Data 2016, December 2017.
10. IVASS (2014), Indagine sui siti comparatori nel mercato assicurativo italiano, novembre.
11. Marano P. (2016), The EU Regulation on Comparison Websites of Insurance Products, in P. Marano et al. (eds.), The “Dematerialized” Insurance, Springer, pp. 61-80
12. Parcu P.L., Stasi M.L., Botta M. (2016), Antitrust Enforcement in Traditional v. Online Platforms, ENTraNCE Policy Brief 2/2016, published by Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies of the European University Institute.
13. Porrini D. (2004), Information exchange as collusive behaviour: evidence from an antitrust intervention in the Italian insurance market, The Geneva Papers of Risk and Insurance – Issue and Practice, vol. 29, n. 2, April, pp. 220-234
14. Porrini D. (2016), Which Consequences in the Insurance Market for the End of the Block Exemption?, Rivista Italiana di Antitrust / Italian Antitrust Review, Vol. 3, N. 2, pp. 160-173.