Contents |
Authors:
Miguel Angel Rivera Rios, National Autonomous University of Mexico (Mexico, Mexico) Jose Benjamin Lujano Lopez, National Autonomous University of Mexico (Mexico, Mexico) Josue García Veiga, National Autonomous University of Mexico (Mexico, Mexico)
Pages: 270-291
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2018.2-22
Download: |
Views: |
Downloads: |
|
|
|
Abstract
The capitalist expansion based on ICTs configured could be considered an ascending Kondratiev wave, understood since the beginning of the 1980s to the outbreak of the financial crisis in 2008. This expansive wave has had its dynamic centre in the United States capitalism, originator and leader of digital and network technology. This Kondratiev has limitations of amplitude and rhythm that have resulted in a premature decline in the productivity performance. The weakness of the fifth Kondratiev is not due to a problem of technological exhaustion but to a precarious socio-political and institutional support in the hegemonic country. This means that the US digital monopolies supported by the peculiar institutionality of that country concentrate the economic benefits, causing general effects of exclusion and social marginalization. The only United States competitor is the People’s Republic of China, which has managed and created a successful digital economy, which in the span of a decade could contest the hegemony of the leading country. This competitive struggle, which is not only commercial but politico-institutional, will determine if the fifth Kondratiev, now in a phase of economic depression, experiences a rebound, mutates in another Kondratiev based on artificial intelligence or opens a prolonged period of uncertainty and instability global accentuated. The deregulation and the absence of counterweights characteristic of United States institutions explain the conversion of powerful digital technology into a disruptive factor instead of an integrating factor. The other world powers, with the exception of the People’s Republic of China, have become just users of digital products and services generated by the United States. Only the People’s Republic of China has ventured, and successfully, to become a digital producer, competing directly with American monopolies. But to the extent that this competition is not primarily about trade and market in the conventional sense, but a clash of normative models of social exploitation of the digitalization, we are properly before a struggle for world hegemony.
Keywords: investing, venture capital, gross domestic product, profits, productivity, digitization index.
JEL Classification: F50.
Cite as: Rios, R., Lopez, J. B. L., & Veiga, J. G. (2018). The fifth global Kondratiev. Low economic performance, instability and monopolization in the digital age. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 270-291. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2018.2-22
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
- Arrieta, I., Goff, L., Jiménez, D., Lainier, J., Weyl, G. E. (2017). “Should We Treat Data as Labor? Moving From `Free´”.American Economic Association. Papers &Proceedings.5.
- Bell, Daniel, (2015). The China Model. Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Black; Sandra, J. Furman, E. Rackstraw y N. Rao.(2017). “The Long Term Decline in US Prime-Age Labour Force Participation”, VOX CEPR´s Portal, 4 de mayo.
- Brybjolfsson, E. y Mcafee, A. (2014).The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies.New York: W W Norton & Co Inc.
- Breznitz, D. y Murphree, M. (2011).Run of the Red Queen: Government, Innovation, Globalization, and Economic Growth in China.Yale University Press.
- Carlsson, B. (2004). The Digital Economy: what is new and what is not?, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, pp. 245-264.
- Casiddy, John (2002). DotCom: The Greatest Story Ever Sold, PerfectBound, Chanhassen.
- Chen, L. y Naughton, B. (2016).An institutionalized policy-making mechanism: China´s return to techno-industrial policy.Research Policy,45(10), pp. 2138-2152.
- China Academy of Information and Communications Technology (2017). White Paperon Digital EconomyDevelopment, Julio.
- David, P.A. (1990). The Dynamo and the Computer: An Historical Perspective on the Modern Productivity Paradox. American Economic Review, 80 (2), Mayo, pp. 355-361.
- Dicken, P. (2015). Global Shift.Mapping the Changing Contours of the World Economy.Nueva York: The Guilford Press.
- Dumas, C. (2010). Globalisation Fractures. How major nations´ interests are now in conflict. London: Profile Books.
- Duncan, R. (2012). The New Depression.The Breakdown of the Paper Money Economy.Singapur: John Wiley & Son.
- Ernst, Dieter (2013) Dieter Ernst, “Why does China Still Ply a Limited Role in Semiconductor Innovation, 24 de Julio de 2013, Honolulu: East West, Honolulu Center.
- Ernst, Dieter (2014). From Catching Up to Forging Ahead? Chinas´s Prospects in Semiconductors, Innovation and Economic Growth Series, Núm. 1, noviembre.
- Financial Times. (2017). China Next Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan, 13 de octubre.
- Financial Times. (2018). The AI Race: China and US Compete to Dominate Big Data, 1 de mayo
- Freeman, C. (2001). A Hard Landing for the ‘New Economy’?Information Technology and the United States National System of Innovation.StructuralChange and Economic Dynamics, 12(2), Julio, pp. 115-139.
- Freeman, C., y Louca, F. (2001). El Tiempo pasa: Desde la revolución industrial a la revolución de la información. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Freeman, C., y Pérez, C. (1988). Structural crises of Adjustment, Business Cycles and Investment Behavior, Technical Change and Economic Theory. pp. 38-66.
- Gawer, A. y Cusumano, M. (2013). Industrial Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation.The Journal of Product Innovation Management, pp. 417-433.
- Goldstein, J. (1988). Long Cycles.Prosperity and War in the Modern Age. Ann Harbor: Yale University Press.
- Gordon, R. (2016). The Rise and Fall of American Growth. Nueva Jersey: Princeton University Press.
- (2014). The Turtle’s Progress: Secular Stagnation Meets the Headwinds. En C. Teulings, & R. Baldwin (eds.), Secular Stagnation: Facts, Causes and Cures. Londres: Centre for Economic Policy Research Press.
- Helpman, E., y Trajtenberg, M. (1998). The Diffusion of General Purpose Technologies.En Helpman, E. (Ed.), General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth.Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 85–119.
- Hirschhorn, L. (1986). Beyond Mechanization, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
- Kondartieff, N.D. (1979 [1925]). Los ciclos económicos largos,Madrid: Akal.
- Kondratiev, N. D. (2008 [1928]). Los ciclos largos de la coyuntura económica Trad. por Luis Sandoval Ramírez. México: UNAM-IIEc-Del Lirio, 2a edición.
- Krugman, P. (2012).Detengamos esta crisis ya, México: Editorial Crítica.
- Kuznets, S. (1973). Crecimiento económico moderno.Madrid: Aguilar.
- Kuznets, S. (1996). “Schumpeter´s Business Cycles”, en C. Freeman (ed.), Long Waves Theory, Cheltenham: An Elgar Reference Collection.
- Lanier, J. (2014). ¿Quién controla el futuro?, Madrid: Debate.
- Liebowitz, S., yMargolis, S. (2001). Winners, Losers & Microsoft; Competition and Antitrust in High Technology, Oakland IndependentInstitute.
- Mandel, E. (1986). Las ondas largas del desarrollo capitalista. La interpretación marxista.Madrid: Siglo XXI.
- McKinsey Global Institute (2013). Disruptive technologies: Advances that Will Transform Life, Business, and the Global Economy,Mayo.
- (2015a). Digital America: A Tale of the Haves and Haves Mores. Diciembre.
- (2015b).Playing to Win.The New Global Competition for Corporate Profits, Septiembre.
- (2017a).A Future That Work: Automation, Employment, and Productivity, enero.
- (2017b), The Great Re-Make: Manufacturing for Modern Times, junio.
- (2017c).China´s digital economy: a leading global force, agosto.
- Marx, Carlos (1946), El Capital, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
- Mensch, G. (1979). Stalemate in Technology: Innovations Overcome the Depression. Cambridge: Mass.
- Modelski, G. (1987). The Study of Long Cycles.En G. Modelski, Exploring Long Cycles. Londres: Frances Pinter.
- Modelski, G.y Thompson, W. (1996). Leading Sectors and World Powers: the Coevolution of Global Economics and Politics, Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
- Piketty, T. (2014). El capital en el siglo XXI, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
- People Republic of China. State Council. (2015). Made in China 2025, 7 de Julio.
- Roberts, M. (2016). La larga depresión. Cómo ocurrió, por qué ocurrió y qué ocurrirá a continuación.Madrid: El Viejo Topo.
- Rosenberg, N. (1976). Perspectives on Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Rosenberg, N., Frischtak, C. (1996). Long Waves and Economic Growth: A Critical Appraisal. A.E.R., pp. 146-151.
- Sachs, D. J. (2017). Building the New American Economy.Nueva York: Columbia University Press.
- Schumpeter, J. ([1939] 2012). Teoría del desenvolvimiento económico: una investigación sobre ganancias, capital, crédito, interés y ciclo económico. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2ª edición.
- Solomou, S. (1988). Phases of EconomicGrowth, 1850-1973. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Stiglitz, J. (2016). Re-Writing the Rules of the American Economy.New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
- Summers, L. (2014). Reflections on the ´New Secular Stagnation Hypothesis´, en C. Teulings, & R. Baldwin (eds.),Secular Stagnation: Facts, Causes and Cures (págs. 27-38). Londres: Centre forEconomicPolicyResearchPress.
- The Economist. (2013). “Changing the Economy. The Long Week”, 3 de noviembre.
- Trotsky, L. (1979 [1923]). La curva del desarrollo capitalista.En Los ciclos económicos largos, O.C. Madrid: Akal.
- Tylecote, A. (1992). The Long Wave in the World Economy: The Present Crisis in Historical Perspective. Londres: Routledge.
- UNCTAD (2017). Informe sobre la Economía de la Información. Digitalización, comercio y desarrollo. Nueva York y Génova: Naciones Unidas.
- US Chamber of Commerce (2017). Made in China 2025. Global Ambitions on Local Protections, Washington, D. C.
- Van Gelderen (1996). Springtide: Reflections on Industrial Development and Price Movements. En Christopher Freeman (ed.). Long Wave Theory, Cheltenham: An Elgar Reference Collection.
- Willcocks, L. (2015). Robotic Process Automation at X Changing. The Outsourcing Unit Working Research Paper Serie, 15/03. Londres: Department of Management, The London School of Economics and Political Science.
|