Contents |
Authors:
Magdalena K. Wyrwicka, Poznan University of Technology (Poznan, Poland) Oksana Erdeli , Poznan University of Technology (Poznan, Poland)
Pages: 339-350
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2018.2-26
Download: |
Views: |
Downloads: |
|
|
|
Abstract
The prepared paper explains the essence of foresight research and shows the potential of building a common future on the basis of vision created by numerous, grass-roots stakeholders. It seems that preparing a vision on the specific area of activity is supported and should not give rise to any special problems, as long as the effects of scientific work and the so-called “good practices” are used. However, the social area, and, specifically, the lack of involvement, the imperfect system of informing about the potential possibilities of providing support, influence games or the lack of interest, combined with selective view of the conditions of execution of common vision, make it difficult, or even impossible to execute the developed future scenarios. The grass-root approach faces the guidelines specified in international documents, local strategies and legal regulations. The state and regional authorities make attempts to support initiatives by founding business environment institutions. However, their activity is poorly recognizable and the provided information is assessed as poor. These findings lead to a conclusion that the integration of activities related to the creation of common future is real with the application of the foresight approach and with the support of local authorities, provided that it faces no significant communication barriers. The results of the analysis revealed that the reasons for shunning knowledge are not necessarily related to poor judgment. Actually, stakeholders protect the current relations from attempts to make other things important, from giving voice to others and from other methods of activity. To reach for new knowledge, additional impulses (e.g. emotional) are required. Such desires cannot be stimulated only individually and provoked by the way of communicating with new knowledge.
Keywords: foresight, common vision, communication with stakeholders, integration.
JEL Classification: J26, J32, J55.
Cite as: Wyrwicka, M. K., & Erdeli, O. (2018). Strategic foresight as the methodology of preparing innovation activities. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 339-350. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2018.2-26
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
- Badzińska E., Siewczyńska M., 2013. Foresight przedsiębiorstw tom 3 Wydawnictwo Politechniki Poznańskiej, Poznań
- Baecker D., 1998. Zum Problem des Wissens in Organisationen, Organisationsentwicklung No 3
- Becker P., 2002. Organisational foresight in Europe: a first overview. European Commission Community Research Working Paper, Luxembourg.
- Borodako K., 2009. Foresight w zarządzaniu strategicznym, Wyd. C.H. Beck, Warszawa
- Burmeister K., Neef A., Beyers N., 2004. Corporate Foresight: Unternehmen gestalten Zukunft, Murmann Verlag, Hamburg
- Cuhls K., 2003. From forecasting to foresight processes—new participative foresight activities in Germany in: Journal for Forecasting Vol. 22, Issue 2‐3, Special Issue on Technology Foresight
- Daheim C., Uerz G., 2008. Corporate Foresight in Europe: From Trend Based Logics to Open Foresight. In: Journal Technology Analysis & Strategic Management Vol. 20, Issue 3
- Europa 2020 https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/economic-and-fiscal-policy-coordination/eu-economic-governance-monitoring-prevention-correction/european-semester/framework/europe-2020-strategy_pl
- Foresight jako narzędzie zarządzania wiedzą i innowacją, 2010. Polska Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości (PARP)
- Georghiou L., 2007. Future of Foresighting for Economic Development, UNIDO Technology Foresight Summit, Budapest
- Informacja o współpracy województwa wielkopolskiego z zagranicą w 2017 roku, 2018. Biuro Współpracy Międzynarodowej Urzędu Marszałkowskiego Województwa Wielkopolskiego (UMWW)
- Kanoniuk A., Nazarko J., 2014. Scenariusze w antycypowaniu i kształtowaniu przyszłości. Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa
- Kanoniuk A., 2016. Strategic foresight in SME companies, materiały Międzynarodowej Konferencji Inżynieria Przyszłości
- Luhmann N., 1997. Die Geselschaft der Geselschaft; Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main
- Matusiak K. B. (red.), 2010. Ośrodki innowacji i przedsiębiorczości w Polsce. Raport 2010, Polska Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości, Warszawa
- Pachciarek H., Rudawska A., 2012. Foresight jako koncepcja wspomagająca rozwój regionalny, Management and Business Administration. Central Europe” 2/2012 (115): s. 11–25, ISSN 2084–3356, Copyright by Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego
- Rohbeck R., Batttistella C., Huizingh E., 2015. Corporate foresight: An emerging field with rich tradition In: Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Vol. 101
- Senge P., 1998. Piąta dyscyplina. Teoria i praktyka organizacji uczących się, Oficyna Ekonomiczna, Warszawa.
- Slaughter, R. A. ,1995. The Foresight Principle: Cultural Recovery in the 21st Century, Adamantine Press, London
- Vision 2050. The new agenda for business, http://docs.wbcsd.org/2018/02/Vision2050.pdf
- Wyrwicka M.K., 2003. Endogenne przesłanki organizacyjne rozwoju przedsiębiorstwa, Rozprawy nr 374, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Poznańskiej, Poznań
- Tendencje rozwojowe Wielkopolski w kontekście transformacji wiedzy w sieciach gospodarczych, M. K. Wyrwicka.(red.), Wyd. Politechniki Poznańskiej, Poznań 2010.
|