Abstract

The aim of the article is the deepening of the content basis of the reproduction of forest resource potential from the perspectives of the methodology of spatial analysis in the context of ecologically balanced reproduction of forest resources. The results of analysis. Formation of a modern, continuous forest management area requires a more in-depth study of forest resource potential as a spatially-forming object in conjunction with subsystems of the national (regional) economic space. It should be noted that the size of forest potential can be defined as the sum of potentials of its separate components in accordance with various types of forest use (main, secondary, recreational, etc.), and also in accordance with existing classifications of functions of forest resources. The existing concepts are to a certain extent complex and systemic in relation to the content basis for determining the optimal forests of the territory, since they reflect the interconnection of economic, ecological and social functions of the aggregate of forest resources, as well as the multi-purpose nature of forest potential. This gives basis, in our opinion, to assert that the achievement of the optimal afforestation of the territory is a necessary but insufficient condition for the formation and optimal value of the forest resource potential with the corresponding components (economic, ecological (ecological resource, ecosystem) and social), and qualitative condition of plantations determine the extent of integrated multi-purpose forest use. It can also be said that the optimal forest potential in the first approximation is determined by the optimal forest area. Thus, the optimal forest resource potential can be considered as the territorial-spatial set of forest biogeocoenoses, which provide continuous environmentally balanced forest management on a multi-purpose and integrated basis. Spatial analysis of forest resource potential includes assessments of qualitative and quantitative indicators of the researched object. It is also necessary to assess the relationship of forest potential with the components of the territorial capital and the main subsystems of the economic space – the territory, population and economy. In the presented study a more differentiated and expanded classification of indicators of the relationship of forest resource potential with the main subsystems of the national (regional) economic space has been proposed. In the framework of the development and implementation of targeted forest reproduction programs based on the principles of project management, it is expedient to use indicators such as the increase in the area of afforestation, calculated on the basis of one percent increase in forest cover and the cost intensity of one-percent of afforestation increasing. Conclusions and directions of further researches. Forest resource potential is an integral part of forest management, which, in its turn, is a component of the economic space. System of socio-ecological and economic characteristics of forest resource potential is largely determined by the forestness of the territory at various spatial levels of management. It is concluded that achievement of optimal forestness of the territory is a prerequisite for the formation of the optimal value of forest resource potential. The presented study offers a more differentiated and expanded classification of indicators of the relationship of forest resource potential with the main subsystems of the national (regional) economic space. In the framework of the development and implementation of targeted programs for recreation of forest resources based on the principles of project management, the use of indicators is justified – the increase in the area of afforestation, calculated on the basis of one percent of increasing the afforestation and the cost intensity of one percent of increasing the afforestation. The spatial organization of forest resource potential is ultimately determined by the position of the forest resources in the territorial natural and economic complex. Further research should be aimed at the formation of institutional conditions and financial and economic mechanisms for ensuring the transformation of components of forest-resource potential into economic assets that are involved in economic activity and create value added.  

Keywords: forest resource potential, spatial analysis, sustainable development, optimal afforestation, socio-ecological and economic assessment

JEL Classification: Q21, Q23.

Cite as: Yarova, I. Y., Mishenina, N. V., & Pizniak, T. I. (2018). Space analysis of reproduction of the forest potential: ecological and economic aspect. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 406-418. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2018.1-32

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Antonenko, I.Ya. (2008). Ekoloho-ekonomichni priorytety modernizatsii liso- resursnoho kompleksu Ukrainy: makroekonomichni vazheli [Ecological and economic priorities of modernization of the forest-resource complex of Ukraine: macroeconomic levers]. B.M. Danilishin (Ed.). Kyiv: KUTEP-INFORM [in Ukrainian].
2. Lytsur, I.M. (2010). Ekoloho-ekonomichni problemy prostorovoi orhanizatsii lisovoho kompleksu Ukrainy [Ecological-economic problems of spatial organization of forest complex of Ukraine]. B.M. Danilishin (Ed.). Kyiv: RVPS Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
3. Ukrainskyi lisovyi portal. Vse pro lisy ta lisove hospodarstvo Ukrainy [Ukrainian Forest Portal. All about forests and forestry of Ukraine]. www.lisportal.org.ua. Retrieved from https://www.lisportal.org.ua/25034/ [in Ukrainian].
4. Prostranstvennyi analiz ekonomiky [Spatial analysis of the economy]. economic_mathematics.academic.ru. Retrieved from https://economic_mathematics.academic.ru [in Russian].
5. Makar, S.V. (2012). Metodolohyia prostranstvennoho analiza v obosnovanii startehii razvytyia lesnoho potentsyala rehyonov Rossii [Methodology of spatial analysis in support of the development of the forest potential development in Russian regions]. Moscow [in Russian].
6. Yarova, I.Ye. (2017). Kontseptualno-metodolohichni zasady transformatsii lisohospodarskoho prostoru: ekonomiko-ekolohichni aspekty [Conceptual and Methodological Principles of the Transformation of the Forestry Area: Economic and Environmental Aspects ]. Zbalansovane pryrodokorystuvannia – Balanced Nature Economy, 3, 126-132 [in Ukrainian].
7. Koval, Ya.V., ? Antonenko, I.Ya. (2004). Ekonomichna (hroshova) otsinka pryrodnykh resursiv lisovoho fondu Ukrainy: teoriia, metodolohiia, metodyka [Economic (monetary) estimation of natural resources of the forest fund of Ukraine: theory, methodology]. Ya.V Koval (Ed.). Kyiv:RVPS Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
8. Mishenin, Ye.V., Mishenina, N.V., & Yarova, I.Ye. (2013). Rozvytok marketynhu ekosystemnoi produktsii ta posluh u lisoresursnii sferi [Development of marketing of ecosystem products and services in the forest resource sector ]. Marketynh i menedzhment innovatsii. Marketynh i menedzhment innovatsii – Marketing and innovation management, 2, 209-219 [in Ukrainian].
9. Mishenin, Ye.V., & Dehtiar, N.V. (2015). Ekonomika ekosystem nykh posluh: teoretyko-metodolohichni osnovy [Economics of ecosystem services: theoretical and methodological foundations]. Marketynh i menedzhment innovatsii – Marketing and innovation management, 2, 243-257 [in Ukrainian].
10. Stepanenko, M.A. (2015). Lisovyi kompleks Ukrainy u formati staloho rozvytku ekonomiky [Forestry complex of Ukraine in the format of sustainable economic development]. Problemy modernizatsii lisoresursnoi sfery u konteksti prostorovoho rozvytku – Problems of modernization of forest resource sphere in the context of spatial development. Kyiv:RVPS Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
11. Khvesyk, M.A. (2014). Kapitalizatsiia pryrodnykh resursiv [Capitalization of natural resources]. M.A. Khvesyk (Ed.). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
12. Khvesyk, M.A. (2016). Finansovo-ekonomichnyi mekhanizm upravlinnia terytorialnymy pryrodno-hospodarskymy kompleksamy [Financial and economic mechanism of management of territorial natural and economic complexes]. M.A. Khvesyk (Ed.). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
13. Skrypnychenko, M.I. (2003). Potentsial serednostrokovoho zrostannia ekonomiky Ukrainy [The potential of medium-term growth of Ukraine’s economy]. Transformatsiini protsesy ta ekonomichne zrostannia v Ukraini – Transformation processes and economic growth in Ukraine. V.M. Heits (Ed.). Kh.: Vyd-vo «Fort» [in Ukrainian].
14. Reimers, N.F. (1990). Pryrodopolzovanie: Slovar – spravochnik. Moscow: Mysl [in Russian].
15. Kalenychenko, Yu.B., & Bashchuk, T.O. (2006). Resursno-biudzhetnyi potentsial [Resource-budget potentia]. Problemy, mekhanizmy ta investytsiine zabezpechennia ratsionalnoho pryrodokorystuvannia – Problems, mechanisms and investment support of rational nature management. Visnyk NUVHP, 4 (36). Rivne [in Ukrainian].
16. Pavlikha, N.V. (2006). Upravlinnia stalym rozvytkom prostorovykh system: teoriia, metodolohiia, dosvid: monohrafiia. [Management of steady development of spatial systems: theory, methodology, experience]. Lutsk: Volynska oblasna drukarnia [in Ukrainian].
17. Lychak, A.Y. (2004). Ekolohicheskaya infrastruktura kak mekhanyzm formyrovaniia ustoichyvoho razvytyia rehiona [Ecological infrastructure as a mechanism for the formation of sustainable development of the region]. Kultura narodov Prychernomoria – Culture of the peoples of the Black Sea, 47, 123-126 [in Russian].
18. Pro Zahalnoderzhavnu prohramu formuvannia natsionalnoi ekolohichnoi merezhi Ukrainy na 2000-2015 roky : Zakon Ukrainy  vid 21 veres. 2000,  № 1989 – III / Uriadovyi kurier «oriientyr» – About the National Program for the Formation of the National Environmental Network of Ukraine for 2000-2015: Law of Ukraine from 2000, № 1989 – ІІІ – № 207. 8 lystop. pp. 3-16 [in Ukrainian].
19. Lozovoi, A.D. (n.d.). Optymalnaia lesystost kak byoyndykator ekoloho-ekonomycheskoho polozhenyia v rehyone [Optimal forest cover as a bio-indicator of the ecological and economic situation in the region]. Retrieved from: www.science-bsea.bgita.ru/2003/leskomp_2003/lozovoy.htm [in Russian].
20. Hliebov, M.M. (2008). Metodychni pytannia formuvannia optymalnoi lisystosti v suchasnykh umovakh [Methodical questions of formation of optimal afforestation in modern conditions]. Ukrainskyi naukovo-doslidnyi instytut lisovoho hospodarstva ta ahrolisomelioratsii. Lisivnytstvo i ahrolisomelioratsiia – Ukrainian Research Institute of Forestry and Agroforestry. Arboriculture and agroforestry, 112, 43 [in Ukrainian].
21. Molchanov, A.A. (1964). Nauchnye osnovy vedenyia khoziaistva v dubravakh lesostepi [Scientific foundations of farming in the oak forests of the forest-steppe]. Moscow [in Russian].
22. Lositskii, K.B. (1961). K voprosu ob optymalnoi lesistosti [To the question of optimal afforestation]. Lesnoe khoz-vo – Forestry, 11, 44-49 [in Russian].
23. Lisystist optymalna. (1999). Optimal afforestation. Ukrainska entsyklopediia lisivnytstva. S.A. Hensiruk. (Ed.). Lviv: Nats. akad. nauk. Ukr.; Nauk. tovarystvo im. Shevchenka [in Ukrainian].
24. Maliuha, V.M. (2008). Zakhysni lisovi nasadzhennia – vazhlyvyi strukturnyi element u formuvanni natsionalnoi ekolohichnoi merezhi [Protected forest plantations are an important structural element in the formation of a national ecological network]. Lisnytstvo i ahrolisomelioratsiia – Forestry and agroforestry, 113, 150-158. Kharkiv: UkrNDILHA [in Ukrainian].
25. Tkach, V.P. (2012). Lisy ta lisystist v Ukraini: suchasnyi stan i perspektyvy rozvytku [Forests and Forests in Ukraine: Current State and Development Prospects]. Ukrainskyi heohrafichnyi zhurnal – Ukrainian Geographic Journal, 2, 49-55 [in Ukrainian].
26. Mazurkin, P.M. (2009). Proshloe, sovremennoe sostoianie i perspektivy lesoahrarnoi Rossii [The current, current state and perspectives of the forest-growing Russia]. Sovremennie problemy nauki i obrazovaniia – Modern problems of science and education, 4, 93-113 [in Russian].
27. Tsybulnykova, M.R. (2014). Problemy i perspektivy otsenki prirodnoho kapitala territorii kak pokazatelia resursoeffektivnoho prirodopolzovaniia [Problems and prospects for assessing the natural capital of the territory as an index of resource-efficient nature management]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniia. Retrieved from http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=15594 [in Russian].
28. Zharikov, V.I., & Dovhan, S.I. (2008). Agroecology: terminological and reference material [Agroecology: terminological and reference material]. Vinnitsa: New Book [in Ukrainian].
29. Khvesyk, M.A., Bystriakov, I.K., & Klynevoi, D.V. (2016). Prostranstvennaia orhanyzatsyia y napravlenyia ispolzovaniia prirodnoho bahatstva Ukrainy [Spatial Organization and Directions for Using the Natural Crime of Ukraine]. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 7 (648), 46-65 [in Russian].
30. Zahalna kharakterystyka lisiv Ukrainy [General characteristics of forests of Ukraine]. dklg.kmu.gov.ua. Retrieved from dklg.kmu.gov.ua/forest/control/uk/publish/article?art_id… [in Ukrainian]. 
31. Forest Resources of Europe, CIS, North America, Australia, Japan and New Zealand. (2000). Main Report. UN-ECE – Geneva.
32. Tkach, V.P., & Mieshkova, V.P. (2008). Suchasni problemy optymizatsii lisystosti Ukrainy [Modern problems of forestry optimization in Ukraine]. Lisivnytstvo i ahrolisomelioratsiia – Forestry and agroforestry, 113, 8-15 [in Ukrainian].
33. Nekos, A.N., & Reho, M.Z. (2015). Ekolohichna tsinnist lisiv ta pryntsypy efektyvnoho zberezhennia ta vidtvorennia lisovykh resursiv [Ecological value of forests and principles of effective preservation and reproduction of forest resources]. Liudyna ta dovkillia. Problemy neoekolohii – Man and environment. Problems of Neo-Ecology, 3-4, 55-60 [in Ukrainian].
34. Kontseptsiia derzhavnoi tsilovoi prohramy rozvytku lisovoho hospodarstva Ukrainy na 2016-2020 roky [The Concept of the State Target Program for the Development of Forestry of Ukraine for 2016-2020]. dklg.kmu.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://dklg.kmu.gov.ua/forest/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=113516&cat_id=82872 [in Ukrainian].
35. Pro zatverdzhennia Derzhavnoi tsilovoi prohramy «Lisy Ukrainy» na 2010-2015 roky : Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 16 veres. 2009 r. №  977 [On Approval of the State Target Program “Forests of Ukraine” for 2010-2015: Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated September 16. 2009 № 977]. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/cgi-bin/laws/main.cgi?nreg=977-2009-%EF [in Ukrainian].