Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of local investments in education on the economic growth of different regions in China. It examines both the direct and indirect effects of financial investments in education. It analyzes the role of human capital and intellectual capital as mediators in the relationship between education and economic growth. The study utilizes a panel data model and a model of mediating effects to conduct an empirical analysis using data from China between 2000 and 2018. The findings indicate that local financial investment in education significantly impacts economic growth, although the magnitude of this effect varies across regions. Investing in education directly stimulates economic growth and indirectly promotes it by accumulating human and intellectual capital. Therefore, increasing investment in education and nurturing innovative, high-level talent are crucial steps towards achieving high-quality economic development in China. The literature review reveals that investment in education has been extensively studied concerning economic growth, with scholars emphasizing the role of human capital in the production process and the positive effects of education on worker productivity and income equality. However, educational investment’s impact on economic growth has shown variations in different countries and regions. Some studies suggest that excessive development of higher education may hinder local economic development, while others highlight the positive impact of educational inputs on human capital quality and technological innovation. To examine the causal mechanism explicitly, this paper proposes a causal inference model based on mediating effects, considering both human capital and intellectual capital as mediating variables. The research methodology includes a baseline regression model and a model of mediating products, employing panel data techniques and instrumental variable estimation to address endogeneity issues. The results of the baseline regression analysis support the positive relationship between local financial investment in education and economic growth, controlling for other factors such as capital stock, labour force, urbanization rate, trade dependence, and population growth. Furthermore, the mediating effects model suggests that education investment indirectly influences economic growth by enhancing human capital and promoting technological innovation. These findings contribute to a better understanding of how education affects regional economies in China. In conclusion, this study highlights the significance of education in driving high-quality economic development in China. It emphasizes the importance of increasing investment in education and fostering the development of innovative and highly skilled individuals. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders seeking to promote sustainable and inclusive economic growth through education reform and targeted investments in human capital.

Keywords: causal inference, education investment, high-quality economic development, innovation, mediating effects, regional development.

JEL Classification: H52, I22, I28.

Cite as: Yu, Y., Tingting, Y., Ruoxi, L., & Xinxin, W. (2023). Examining the Role of Education Spending on China’s Regional Economy from the Standpoints of Human and Intellectual Capital. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 14(2), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2023.2-12

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., & Zilibotti, F. (2006). Distance to frontier, selection, and economic growth. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4(1), 37–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
2. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1998). Market structure and the growth process. Review of Economic Dynamics, 1(1), 276–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
3. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 2, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
4. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 1, 115–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
5. Cai, F. (2020). Research on the relationship between science and technology innovation activities and economic development in colleges and universities–Statistical analysis based on R&D activities in colleges and universities. Journal of Higher Education (07), 40-42.
6. Chen, P. L., Lu, S. N., & Hou, J. H. (2013). Analysis of the crowding-out effect of government education spending. Education and Economics, (4), 16-20. [Google Scholar]
7. Chu, D. Y., & Yan, W. (2009). Local government expenditure and rural residents’ consumption demand: An empirical analysis based on provincial panel data from 1998-2007. Statistical Research, 26(8), 38-44.
8. Grossman, G., & Helpman, E. (1991). In Innovation and growth in the global economy (pp. 56–58). essay, The MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
9. Hong, Y. X., (2013). On innovation-driven economic development strategies. The Economist (01), 5-11. [Google Scholar]
10. Hong, Y., & Xiao, H. (2009). The impact of government consumer spending on residents’ consumption: A perspective on Chinese residents’ consumption behavior. Research in Finance and Trade, (4), 69-76. Retrieved from [Link]
11. Krueger, A. B., & Lindahl, M. (2001). Education for growth: Why and for whom? Journal of Economic Literature, 39(4), 1101–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
12. Li, G. Z., (2005). Government spending and consumption: Substitution or complementarity. World Economy, 28(5), 38-45. [Link]
13. Liu, S. C., & Ma, S. Y. (2001). An empirical analysis of the relationship between deficits, national debt and economic growth: A review of the crowding-out effect of active fiscal policy. Economic Research, (2), 13-19. [Link]
14. Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
15. Min, W. F., Yu, J., & Wu, J. (2021). The role of education in expanding domestic demand to drive economic growth. Educational Research, (5),12—22.
16. Nelson, R. R., & Phelps, E. S. (1966). Investment in Humans, Technological Diffusion, and Economic Growth. The American Economic Review, 56(1/2), 69–75. [Google Scholar]
17. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
18. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 5(2), 71–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
19. Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in Human Capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17. [Google Scholar]
20. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 70(1), 65-94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
21. Vandenbussche, J., Aghion, P., & Meghir, C. (2006). Growth, distance to frontier and composition of Human Capital. Journal of Economic Growth, 11(2), 97–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
22. Yao, D. M., Ning, J., & Wei, Shi,Y. (2017). How Aging Affects Science and Technology Innovation. World Economy, (4), 105-128. Retrieved from [Link]
23. Yan, P., & Wang, B. (2004). Technical efficiency, technical progress and productivity growth:An empirical analysis based on DEA. Economic Research, (12),55-65. [Google Scholar]
24. Zhang, Y. M., Hao, Y., & Li, M. J. (2012). An empirical study of the effects of teacher factors and student factors on students’ academic performance: A multilevel linear model analysis based on large-scale test data. Teacher Education Research, 24(4), 56-62. Retrieved from [Link]