Abstract

Branding is a very common issue for higher educational institutions like other profitable organizations over the last few years. This study illustrates the present branding scenarios of different public and private universities of Bangladesh which will help to provide a vivid knowledge about the regional universities of Bangladesh. Addressing to the present branding challenges and issues, it was observed that the process of branding initiative is very complex due to multiple reasons, i.e. lack of consistency, accuracy, and commitment from the different stakeholders. For the purpose of the study, the top ten leading public and private universities have been selectedfor collecting data on brand initiatives. For the objective of the research, 200 existing students along with 200 potential students were selected.  Students, qualified or eligible for university admission were taken randomly as the sample of the study. Several variables including images of the university, education quality, rank, reputation, location, political situation or influence and teachers’ quality have been measured through a seven-point measurement scale to evaluate the branding initiative. This study reveals that regarding the selection of the public and private universities in Bangladesh, students have a wide range of consideration; and their evaluation about the institution is in paradox, because the institutions they have intended to attend may not be going to fulfil their desired expectations in terms of different dimensions. Branding initiatives of the selected universities are not enough in these circumstances for branding Bangladeshi universities at an international level. Findings of the study have revealed that students are going to target the branded and reputed universities comparing to the quality of education. It hasalso been observedthat employersalso recruit graduatesfrom the top-ranking branded universities for their organizational performance. The academics and the marketing policy makers of public and private universities will be assisted by the findings of this studyregarding their branding issues in future. Lastly, the study highlights some limitations and future direction in this context. 

Keywords: branding, Higher Educational Institutions, research avenues, Bangladesh, student.

JEL Classification: A22, A23, H52.

Cite as: Alam, M. I, Faruq, M. O., Alam, M. Z., & Gani, M. O. (2019). Branding initiatives in Higher Educational Institutions: current issues and research agenda. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 34-45. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.1-03

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Aaker, D., A. & Joachimsthaler, E. (2000). Brand Leadership,New York, the Free. 
2. Aaker, D., A. (2004), Leveraging the Corporate Brand, California Management Review,4, 6-18.
3. Alessandri, S., W. (2001), Modeling Corporate Identity: A Concept Explication and Theoretical Explanation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 6, 173-182.
4. Bangladesh University Grants Commission (2006). Strategic Plan for Higher Education in Bangladesh: 2006-2026, Dhaka.
5. Bangladesh University Grants Commission (2010). Annual Report-2010
6. Bangladesh University Grants Commission (2011). Annual Report-2011
7. Black, D. J. (2008). The Brandingof Higher Education. Greensboro, NC: SEM Works.
8. Bonnema, J., & Van der Waldt, D. R. (2008). Information and Source Preferences of a Student Market High Education. International Journal of Educational Management, 22, 314–327.
9. Brandi A. Watkins el al., (2013), «Assessing University Brand Personality through Logos: An Analysis of the Use of Academics and Athletics in University Branding».Published Online: 16 July2013.
10. Chris Chapleo (2005) Do Universities Have “Successful” Brands? International Journal of Educational Advancement,54–64; doi:10.1057/ Palgrave. ijea.2140233, University of Portsmouth, Richmond Building, Portland Street, UK.
11. Donald, E. (2003). Trendsfrom the UNESCO Regional Consultation on Higher Education – A Concept Paper. 
12. Jim Black (2005), «Branding of Higher Education»,the Great Awakening in the Hallowed Halls of Academia Elizabeth Scarborough, President and Partner, May 2007.

13. Joseph, Mathew, and Deborah F Spake (2009) Summary Brief: University Branding Initiatives: What Do Private University Students Want to Know about a Prospective Institution and How Do They Get Information? Society for Marketing Advance Proceedings, p.142. 

14. Judson, K. M., Aurand, T. W., Gorchels, L., & Gordon, G. L (2009). Building a University Brand from within:University Administrators‟Perspectives of Internal Branding, Services Marketing Quarterly, 30 (1), (2009), 54-68 
15. Kathleen Dawley (2000), «Successful Branding is Critical to Colleges and Universities Seeking to Prosper in Challenging Times»,UK.
16. Keller, K.L. (2003). Strategic Branding Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity, 8–9. Prentice Hall.
17. Kotler, P, & Fox, K. F. A. (1995). Strategic Marketing for Education Institutions, (2nd Ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
18. Lockwood, R., & Hadd, J. (2008). Building a Brand in Higher Education.Gallup Management Journal, 1-7.
19. Morrison, M. (2013) «Why Higher Education Needs Marketing More Than Ever».Advertising Age.
20. Riege, A., M (2003). Validity and Reliability Tests in Case Study Research: A Literature Review with Hands on Applications for Each Research Phase. Qualitative Market Research – An International Journal, Vol.6,pp. 75-86.
21. Robert A. Sevier (2000), «Brand as Relevance», www.stamats.com/whitepapers.
22. Rony, M.E. and Rashid, S.M.A. (2009). «Perspective of Teaching-Learning Practices in Private Universities of Bangladesh» NAEM Journal, 5 (9), 67-77.
23. Rosenthal, G. (2003). A Name by any other Name: Responding to the Increasing Role ofMarketing in Higher Education (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), Universityof Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
24. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research Methods for Business Students,Harlow, UK, Pearson.
25. Scarborough, Elizabeth (2007). Branding the Higher Education: The Great Awakening in the Hallowed of Academia.
26. Schultz, D., E. & Schultz, H., F. (2004). Brand Babble: Sense and Nonsense AboutBranding, London, Thomson.
27. Schultz, M., Hatch, M., J. & Larsen, M. H. (2000). The Expressive Organization: LinkingIdentity, Reputation andthe Corporate Brand. Oxford University Press.
28. Shamma, H., & Hassan, S. (2009), Customer and Non-Customer Perspectives for Examining Corporate Reputation. Journal of Product and Brand Management,18(5), 326-337.
29. Shampeny, Renelle (2003), «Colleges Turn Attention to Branding in Competition for New Students», The Business Review (Albany), Retrieved 5 June2008 from [http://bizjournals.com/albany/stories/2003/10/27/ focus5.html? t=printable].
30. Simoes, C., Dibb, S. & Fisk, R., P. (2005). Managing Corporate Identity: An Internal Perspective.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,33, 153-168
31. Stensaker, B. (2005). Strategy, Identity, andBranding – Re-Inventing Higher Education Institutions. A paper presented to the City Higher Education SeminarSeries.
32. Wæraas, A. and Solbakk, M.N. (2009), Defining the Essence of a University: Lessons from Higher Education Branding. Higher Education 57, 449-462. 
33. Why higher education needs marketing more than ever (2013) http://adage.com/article/cmo‐strategy/higher‐education‐marketing/244820/
34. «Higher Education and the Challenges of Communication». Noir SurBlanc White Paper.