Abstract

The article summarizes the arguments and counterarguments within the scientific discussion on the quantification of various spheres of enterprise activity based on their system representation. The main purpose of the study is to improve the basic model of systemic economics as the basis for developing a method for quantitative assessment of the harmonious process of development of innovative project-oriented enterprises. Systematization of literary sources and approaches to solving the problem of choosing a basic model has shown that the most reasonable and developed approach is based on the model of the economic tetrad. Various authors used the model when developing indicators of balance and stability of economic systems. However, the known results were not compared, and the model was not used to describe the innovative development of enterprises. The urgency to solve this scientific problem is in the fact that in the era of knowledge economy, innovation development is becoming one of the main directions of activity of modern enterprises, which needs the scientific ground. Studying of the point related to creation of a method for quantitative assessment of the innovative project-oriented enterprises development is carried out in the following logical sequence: making the economic tetrad matching requirements of the system integrity and completeness; conducting an analysis of resource interchange in the triad of the economic tetrad; revealing the essence of the mechanism for managing processes of growth and development of enterprises; developing a mathematical apparatus to describe the dynamic structural changes of enterprises; conducting a computer experiment using five different approaches to calculating the indicators of dynamic structural changes during the introduction of innovations; conducting a comparative analysis of the results. The methodical toolkit of the research considers the postulates of systematicity, scale, harmony, and positions of qualitative mathematics and the triple convolution method. The object of the study is the selected phases of the innovation project life cycle since they determine the peculiarities of the dynamic structural changes of enterprises during the introduction of innovations. The article presents the results of the empirical analysis, carried out based on computer modelling of the innovation project implementation within six different approaches. This showed a fundamentally different nature of the change in structural balance indicators for these approaches. The study theoretically proves and empirically confirms that the proposed indicator of the internal coherence of opposite actions (chaotic and organized) corresponds to the logic of the harmonious implementation of innovation activity. The results of the study can be applied when creating monitoring and management systems for the development of innovative project-oriented enterprises.

Keywords: balance, harmony, implicit phenomena, innovation project, triple convolution method.

JEL Classification: B49, C63, D89, O10.

Cite as: Rach, V., Rossoshanska, O., Medvedieva, O., & Yevdokymova, A. (2019). System modelling of development of innovative project-oriented enterprises. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 105-131. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.1-09

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Ackoff, R. L. (2002). Akoff o menedzhmente [Ackoff about Management].(L. A. Volkova, Trans). Saint Petersburg: Piter  
2. Adametsky, K. (1972).O nauke orhanizatsii [About the science of organization]. (A.N. Sukhoruchenko, Trans). Moscow: Economy  
3. Anokhin, P.K. (1973). Principial’nye voprosy obshhej teorii funkcional’nyh sistem [Principal issues of the general theory of functional systems].Printsipy sistemnoy orhanizatsii funktsiy. – Principles of the system organization of functions.Moscow, «Science», (pp. 5-61). Retrieved from http://www.nemoai.narod.ru/Library/Functional.pdf [in Russian].
4. Barlybaev, A.A., Sitnova, I.A, & Yunusova, G.M. (2015). Kachestvinnie i kolichistvinnie metody v ekonimicheskoy nauke: sovremennoie sostoyanie i perspektivi vzaimodeistvia [Qualitative and quantitative methods in economics: current state and prospects for interaction]. Ekonomicheskiy analiz: teoria i praktika. Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 32 (431). Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kachestvennye-i-kolichestvennye-metody-v-ekonomicheskoy-nauke-sovremennoe-sostoyanie-i-perspektivy-vzaimodeystviya/ [in Russian].
5. Barmashov, K.S. (2018). Garmonizacija promyshlennoj i torgovoj politiki predprijatija [Harmonization of an industrial and trade policy of an enterprise]. Vestnik Gosudarstvenyi universitet upravleniya– Vestnik of the State University of Management, 8. Retrieved fromhttps://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/garmonizatsiya-promyshlennoy-i-torgovoy-politiki-predpriyatiya [In Russian]
6. Barysheva, A. (2010). Impllitsytnye znania kak vneratsionalnyi kohnityvnyi mekhanizm [Implicit knowledge as an non-rational cognitive mechanism]. Ekonomichiskie stratehii – Economic Straegies, 5, 64-69. Retrieved from http://www.inesnet.ru/wp-content/mag_archive/2010_05/ES2010-05-barysheva.pdf [in Russian].
7. Chepkasov V.L., & Mikhailova T.L. Novye smysly poniatia entropii, ili k voprosu o neoklassicheskom variante poniatia entropii [NEW Meaningd of the Entropy Concept, or to the Question About The Non-Classical Option Of The Entropy Concept]. Retrieved from https://files.scienceforum.ru/pdf/2014/6012.pdf [in Russian].
8. Chepkasov, V.L., & Mikhailova, T.L. (2015). Novye smysly poniatia entropii, ili k voprosu o neoklassicheskom variante poniatia entropii [NEW Meaningd of the Entropy Concept, Or To The Question About The Non-Classical Option Of The Entropy Concept]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika i upravleniye–Vestnik of the Voronezh State University. Series: Economics and Management, 1 (68), 140-146. Retrieved from https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_23492066_31118142.pdf  
9. Deming, W. (2006). Novaya ekonomika [New Economy]. Moscow: Eksmo [in Russian].
10. Dulesov, A.S. (2010). Priminenie formuly Shenona I heometricheskoho obobtschenia dlia opredilenia entropii. [Application of the formula of Shannon and geometric generalization for the definition of entropy]. Perspektivy nauky – Prospects of science,3 (05), 92-95 [in Russian].
11. Dyachkova, Yu., & N., Kiseleva, O. A. (2016). Innovatsionnaia biznes model kak osnova konkurentsii na sovremennom stroytelnom rynke. [Innovative Bussines Model as a Basis for Competition on The Modern Construction Market]. Visnyk Donbaskoii derzhavnoii mashynobudivnoii akademii – Messenger of the Donbas State Machine-Building Academy, 3 (39), 31-36.Retrieved from http://www.dgma.donetsk.ua/science_public/ddma/Herald_3(39)_2016/article/8.pdf [in Russian].
12. Etzkowitz, G. (2010). Troynaya spiral’. Universitety – predpriyatiya – gosudarstvo. Innovatsii v deystvii [Triple Helix. Universities – enterprises – the state. Innovation in action]. A.F. Uvarova (Ed.). Tomsk: Publishing house of Tomsk State University of control systems and radio electronics [in Russian].
13. Galchinsky, A.S. (2006). Global’nіtransformacії: konceptual’nіal’ternativi. Metodologіchnіaspekti [Global Transformation: Conceptual Alternatives. Methodological aspects]. Kyiv: Lybid’ [In Ukrainian]
14. George Michael, L., Works, D., & Watson-Hemphill, K. (2006). Stremitytel’nyie innovatsii[Rapid Innovations].(Trans). Kyiv: Companion Group), 35 [in Russian].
15. Gidlevsky, A.V. (2011). Paradoksy entropii (spekulativnyi kharakter sovremennoy nauchnoy metodolohii) [Entropy Paradoxes (the speculative nature of modern scientific methodology)], Vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of Omsk State University, 4, 199–201.Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/paradoksy-entropii-spekulyativnyy-harakter-sovremennoy-nauchnoy-metodologii [in Russian].
16. Gini, K. (1970). Srednie velichiny [Average values] (Trans). Moscow: Statistics [in Russian].
17. Goroshkova, L.A., & Volkov, V.P. (2016). Systemnyi pidkhid do upravlinnia enerhozberezhennia na mezorivni [System approach to energy conservation management on meso-level].Visnyk Pryazovskoho derzhavnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu – Journal of Azov State Technical University, 31 (1), 133-139.Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/VPDTU_ek_2016_31(1)__19.
18. Ivanova, I.A., Karastelev, B.Ya., & Yakubovsky, Y.V. (2011). Model troynoy spirali i fraktal’naya struktura innovatsionnoy sistemy v prilozhenii k realizatsii konkretnogo innovatsionnogo [The triple helix model and the fractal structure of the innovation system as applied to the implementation of a specific innovation project]. Vestnik TGEU– Bulletin of TSUE, 57. Retrieved from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/model-troynoy-spirali-i-fraktalnaya-struktura-innovatsionnoy-sistemy-v-prilozhenii-k-realizatsii-konkretnogo-innovatsionnogo-proekta [in Russian].
19. Ivanus, A.I. (2013). Garmonizacija upravlenija innovacionnym razvitiem jekonomiki na osnove kognitivnoj tehnologii (teorija i praktika) [Harmonization of Management of Innovative Development of the Economy Based on Cognitive Technology (Theory and Practice)]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Moscow: Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation. 
20. Jamshid, G. (2010). Sistemnoye myshleniye. Kak upravlyat’ khaosom i slozhnymi protsessami. Platforma dlya modelirovaniya arkhitektury biznesa [System thinking. How to manage chaos and complex processes]. Business Architecture Modeling Platform]. Minsk: Grevtsov Books [in Russian].
21. Kleiner, G.B. (2002). Sistemnaya paradigma i teoriya predpriyatiya [Systemic paradigm and enterprise theory]. Voprosy ekonomiki – Economics question, 10,47-69 [in Russian].
22. Kleiner, G.B. (2008a). Jekonomika dolzhna byt’ garmonichnoj![The economy must be harmonious!]. Jekonomika i zhizn’ – Economy and Life, 19. Retrieved from https://www.eg-online.ru/article/53986 [In Ukrainian]
23. Kleiner, G. (2008b). Sistemnaya paradigma i sistemnyy menedzhment [System Paradigm and System Management]. Rossiyskiy zhurnal menedzhmenta – Russian Journal of Management, 3 (6),27-50. Retrieved from http://kleiner.ru/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Kleiner_sispsism.pdf [in Russian].
24. Kleiner, G.B. (2011a). Resursnaja teorija sistemnoj organizacii jekonomiki [Resource Theory of the System Organization of the Economy].Rossijskij zhurnal menedzhmenta – Russian Management Journal, 3 (9), 3-28. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/resursnaya-teoriya-sistemnoy-organizatsii-ekonomiki
25. Kleiner, G.B. (2011b). Sistemnaia orhanizatsia economiki i problemy rasprostranenia innovatsiy. [The system of organization of the economy and the problems of the spread of innovation]. Vestnik Universiteta, Hosudarstvenniy universitet upravlenia – University Messenger, State University of Management, 3, 26-36. Retrieved from http://kleiner.ru/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Sistemnaya-organizatsiya-e%60konomiki-i- problemyi-rasprostraneniya-innovatsiy.pdf [in Russian].
26. Kleiner, G.B. (2012). O granicah neogranichennogo  [About the Limits of the Unlimited].Voprosy jekonomiki – Economic issues, 2, 140-145. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2012-2-140-145 [In Russian]
27. Kleiner, G. B. (2013).Sistemnaia ekinomika kak platforma razvitia sovremennoy ekonomichekoy teorii [System Economics as a Platform for the Development of Modern Economic Theory]. Voprosy Ekonomiki– Economic issues, 6. Retrieved from http://kleiner.ru/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Sistemnaya-e%60konomika.pdf [ in Russian].
28. Kleiner, G. (2014). Sistemnaya sbalansirovannost ekonomiki: osnovnye printsipy V.kn. Sistemnyy analiz v ekonomike [Systemic Balancing of the Economy: Basic Principles V.kn. System analysis in economics]. (Vols. 1), (pp. 9-18). Moscow: TSEMI RAN. Retrieved from http://kleiner.ru/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Kleiner.SAvE_.pdf [in Russian].
29. Kleiner, G.B. (2015a). Hosudarstvo – rehion – otrasl – predpriatie: karkas systemnoy ustoychivosty ekonomiky Rossii.Chast’ 2 [State-region-industry-enterprise: the framework of the systemic sustainability of the Russian economy Part 2].Ekonomika rehionov – Economy of Regions, 3, 9-17 [in Russian].
30. Kleiner, G.B. (2015b). Mezhdisciplinarnost’, sistemnost’, garmonija – orientiry razvitija social’no-jekonomicheskih issledovanij [Interdisciplinary, systematic, harmony – guidelines for the development of socio-economic research].Perspektivy razvitija mezhdisciplinarnyh social’no-jekonomicheskih i gumanitarnyh issledovanij – Prospects for the development of interdisciplinary socio-economic and humanities research.Reports and presentations of the round table participants (June 24, 2015, Rostov-on-Don), (pp. 12-32), Rostov-on-Don: Publishing House of the Southern Federal University [In Russian]
31. Kleiner, G.B. (2016). Ustojchivost rossijskoj ehkonomiki v zerkale sistemnoj ehkonomicheskoj teorii (Chast 2) [The stability of the Russian economy in the mirror of the systemic economic theory (Part 2)]. Voprosy ekonomiki – Economics question, 1,117-138.Retrieved from https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25257709 [in Russian]. 
32. Knyazeva, E.N. (2016).Innovatsionnaia slozhnost [InnoInnovative complexity]. Saint-Petesburg:Aletheia, [in Russian]
33. Kochetkov, A. V., & Fedotov P. V. (2015). O razlichnyh smyslah poniatia «Entropia»[About various meanings of the concept «Entropy»]. Internet zhurnal Naukovedinie – Internet magazine Science studies, 6 (31). Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-razlichnyh-smyslah-ponyatiya-entropiya [in Russian].
34. Kornai, J. (1999). Systemic paradigm. Obshchestvo i ekonomiki – Society and the economy, 3-4, 85-96.
35. Kravchenko, M.O. (2017) Systemno strukturna kontseptsia ekonomichnoi stiykosti pidpriemstv [System-structural concept of economic stability of enterprises] . Kiev: PP Vishemirsky V. S. [in Ukrainian].
36. Leontyev, B.B. (2015). Obosnovaniye teorii sistemnoy ekonomiki [Justification of the theory of system economics]. Pravovaya informatika– Legal Informatics, 4.Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obosnovanie-teorii-sistemnoy-ekonomiki  
37. Leus, V. A. (2003).O heometricheskom obobttschenii entropii [About a geometric generalization of entropy]. Problemy peredachi informatsii – Problems of Information transmission,2 (39), 15-22 [in Russian].
38. Lukyanenko, D., Lukyanenko, O., & Doroshenko, O. (2013). Implementatsiya paradyhmy ekonomiky znanʹu stratehiyi natsionalʹnoho ekonomichnoho rozvytku [Implementation of the knowledge economy paradigm in the strategy of national economic development]. Mizhnarodna ekonomichna polityka – International economic policy, 2, 5-26. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Mep_2013_2_3 [in Ukrainian].
39. Martseva, T.G. (2014). Rynok intellektual’noj sobstvennosti: problemy i perspektivy [Intellectual Property Market: Problems and Prospects]. Vestnik instituta druzhby narodov Kavkaza – Bulletin of the Institute of Friendship of the Peoples of the Caucasus, 4, 6-11.Retrieved from https://www.idnk.ru/images/vestnik/20144.pdf [in Russian].
40. Medvedev, V.A. (2005). Kontseptualnoye prostranstvo sotsiologii v formate neklassicheskoy modeli ratsionalnosti [Conceptual space of sociology in the format of a non-classical model of rationality]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii – Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 3 (8), 5-21. Retrieved from http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/638/762/1219/001-Medvedev.pdf  
41. Meyer, K., & Davis, S. (2007). Zhyvaia orhanizatsyia [Live organization] (A. Stativka, Trans). Moscow: Publishing House «Good Book») [in Russian].
42. Molchanov, A.M. (1968). Ob odnoy teoreme A.Ya. Khinchina [About a theorem of A. Ya. Khinchin]. IPM Academy of Sciences of the USSR [in Russian].
43. Muratov, A. S. (2012).Garmonizacionnyj podhod k upravleniju jekonomicheskimi sistemami [Harmonization approach to the management of economic systems]. Upravlenie jekonomicheskimi sistemami – Management of economic systems, 5. Retrieved from http://www.uecs.ru/uecs41-412012/item/1342-2012-05-14-06-38-05 [In Russian]
44. Muratov, А.S. (2013). Jevoljucija teorii jekonomicheskih garmonij i ego prikladnoe znachenie v upravlenii organizacijami [Thr evolution of the theory economic harmonies and its applied use in organosations management]. Vestnik Kemerovs’kogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Vestnik of the Kemerovo State University, 3 (55), 130-140. Retrieved from http://oaji.net/articles/2014/561-1394512281.pdf [In Russian]
45. Neave, G. (2014). Organizatsiya kak sistema: printsipy ustoychivogo postroyeniya biznesa Edvardsa Deminga [Organization as a system: the principles of sustainable business building by Edwards Deming]. (Trans). Moscow: Alpina Publisher [in Russian].
46. Orekhov, A.M. (2009).Metody ekonomicheskih issledovaniy [Methods of economic research].Moscow: INFRA-M [in Russian].
47. Orlov, A.I. (2013). O srednikh velichinakh [About average values]. Upravlenie bol’shimi sistemami– Large systems management, 46. Retrieved from http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-srednih-velichinah. [in Russian].
48. Osipov, A.I., & Uvarov A.V. (2004). Entropyia I ii rol v nauke [Entropy and its role in science], Sorosovskij obrazovatel’nyj zhurnal — Soros Educational Journal,8 (1), 70–79. Retrieved from https://www.twirpx.com/file/1398612 [in Russian].
49. Ovchinnikiv, Y.L., Yashin, S,S, Tarasenko, D.S, & Davydkin-Gogel M.M. (2017). tozhdestvennost’zakonov Vebera – Fehnera i Stivensa [Identity Of Laws Of Weber – Fechner And Stevens]. Istochnik: obshchie voprosy mirovoj naukiMezhdunarodnaja nauchnaja konferencija. Mezhdunarodnaja federacija issledovanij «Science Public»–SOURCE: GENERAL QUESTIONS OF WORLD SCIENCE International Scientific Conference. International Research Federation «Science Public».(pp.8-12). Amsterdam: Konferentsia: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_29829994_56795937.pdf [in Russian].
50. Palash, S.V. (2017). Strukturnaia sbalansirovanost ekonomiki: hosudarstvinnie prohramy promyshlennoho razvitia d Rosiyskoy Federtsii [Structural Balance of the Economy: State Programs for Industrial Development in the Russian Federation]. Nauchno tekhnicheskie vedomosti Sankt Peterburhskoho hosudarstvennoho politekhnicheskoho universyteta. Ekonomichiskie nauki – Scientific and technical reports of the St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University. Economic sciences, 1. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/strukturnaya-sbalansirovannost-ekonomiki-gosudarstvennye-programmy-promyshlennogo-razvitiya-v-rossiyskoy-federatsii [in Russian].
51. Petrova, V.A., & Shadrina, E.I. (2013). Vzaimosvyaz’ investicij v R&D i finansovyh pokazatelej kompanii [Interconnection of investments in R&D and financial indicators of the company]. Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologii – Modern high-tech technologies, 10-2, 201-203.Retrieved from http://www.top-technologies.ru/ru/article/view?id=33425 [in Russian].
52. Platonova, E.D., Platonov, A.Y., & Yagodkina, I.A. & Emelyanov, A.A. (2012). O metodologicheskom resurse sistemnogo issledovaniya ekonomiki [On the methodological resource of systems research of economics]. Internet-zhurnal Naukovedenie – Internet Journal Naukovedeni,4 (13). Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-metodologicheskom-resurse-sistemnogo-issledovaniya-ekonomiki [in Russian].
53. Poljancev, V.A. (1973). Osobennosti metodologii analiticheskogoi sistemnogo podhodov [Features of the methodology of analytical and systemic approaches]. Principy sistemnoj organizacii funkcij – Principles of system organization of functions.(pp. 91-98). Moscow: Nauka [in Russian]
54. Rach V.A., Medvedeva E.M., Rossoshanskaya O.V., & Evdokimova A.V. (2011). Innovacionnoe razvitie: model’ trojnoj spirali v kontekste sistemnocelostnogo videnija [Innovative development: the triple helix model in the context of systemic vision]. Proceedings from XVI Mizhnarodna naukovo-praktychna konferentsiia «Problemy i perspektivy innovacionnogo razvitija jekonomiki»– The Sixteenth International Scientific and Practical Conference «Problems and Prospects for the Innovation Development of the Economy». (pp. 157-163). Simferopol: IT Arial [in Ukrainian]
55. Rach, V.A. & Pilipenko A.I. (2017). Kilkistni metody resursno chasovoho otsiniuvannia v hnuchkiy metodolohii rozrobky prohramnoho zabezpechennia [Quantitative methods of the resource-hourly assessment in the gnuchy methodologies of software development].Upravlinnia proektamy ta rozvytok vyrobnytsva: zbirnyk naukovyh prats – Project management and development of production:collection of science works, 1 (61),62-71 [in Unkrainian].
56. Romanov, D.B. (2015). Uroki noveyshey istorii Singapura [Lessons from Singapore’s Newest History]. Problemy razvitiya territorii– Problems of development of the territory, 6 (80). Retrieved from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/uroki-noveyshey-istorii-singapura [in Russian].
57. Rossoshanskaya, O.V. (2000).Osobennosti planirovania proektov na osnove systemnoy modeli [Features of project planning based on a system model] .Upravlinnia proektami ta rozvytok vyrobnytstva – Project management and development of production. Lugansk: publishing of SNU named V. Dahl, 1 (1), 57-62 [in Russian].
58. Rossoshanska, O.V.(2015).Otsinniuvania economichnoi bezpeki innovatsiynikh proektno orientovanikh pidpriemstv [Evaluation of eco-friendly security of inovation design – oriental enterprises]. Severodonetsk: publishing in SNU im. V. Dahl. 
59. Rossoshanska, O.V. (2017). Mekhanizm otsiniuvannia ekonomichnoi bezpeky innovatsiinykh proektno-oriientovanykh pidpryiemstv [Mechanism of estimation of economic safety of innovative project-oriented enterprises]. Upravlinnia proektamy ta rozvytok vyrobnytstva – Project management and production development: Collection of scientific works, 2, 94-122 [in Ukrainian].
60. Rybachuk, M.A. (2016). Dialektika vzaimodejstviya obshchenauchnyh i disciplinarnyh paradigm (na primere estestvoznaniya i ekonomiki) [The dialectic interaction general scientific and disciplinary paradigms (On example of natural science and economics)]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoj teorii – Journal of Economic Theory, 1, 115-122.Retrieved from https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_25590795_63139169.pdf [in Russian].
61. Samoldin, A.N. (2015). Zhuznenniy tsikl innovatsiy [Life cycle of innovations], Vestnik Gosudarstvenyi universitet upravleniya – Vestnik of the State University of Management, 2. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zhiznennyy-tsikl-innovatsiy.
62. Senatorov, Yu.M.(2018). Podhody k ponimaniu sushchnosty informatsii [Approaches to understanding the essence of information].Kontekst i refleksiia: filosofia o mire i cheloveke – Context and reflection: a philosophy about the world and man, 1A (7), 5-20. Retrieved from http://publishing-vak.ru/file/archive-philosophy-2018-1/1-senatorov.pdf [in Russian].
63. Senge, P. (2009).Pyataya distsiplina. Iskusstvo i praktika obuchayushcheysya organizatsii [Fifth Discipline. Art and practice of the learning organization]. (B.Pincker, I. Tatarinova, Trans). Moscow: ZAO «Olymp-Business»[in Russian].
64. Sharipova, O.S., & Nadion, G.O. (2012). Garmonіzacіja dіjal’nostіjak proces zabezpechennja ekonomіchnoїbezpeki pіdpriєmstva [Harmonization of activities as a process of ensuring the economic security of the enterprise].Upravlinnya proektamy` ta rozvy`tok vy`robny`cztva – Project management and production development, 1 (41), 50-55 [In Ukrainian]
65. Skryl’, T.V. (2008). Formirovanie informatsionnoho sektora ekonomiky: teoretyko metodolohycheskiy aspekt [Formation of the Information Sector of the Economy: Theoretical and Methodological Aspect]. Vestnik THU – Messenger of TGU, 4. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/formirovanie-informatsionnogo-sektora-ekonomiki-teoretiko-metodologicheskiy-aspekt [in Russian].
66. Smorodinskaya, N. (2011). Troynaya spiral’ kak novaya matritsa ekonomicheskikh sistem [The Triple Helix as a New Matrix of Economic Systems]. Innovation, 4.Retrieved from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/troynaya-spiral-kak-novaya-matritsa-ekonomicheskih-sistem[in Russian].
67. Soroko, E.M. (2011). Innovatsionnaya sutschnost zakonostrukturnoy harmonii i kohnitivnyh tehnolohiy na puti ot lohikotsentrisma k systemotsentrizmu: postizhenie sutschnosty ustoychevykh sostoianiy obtschestva i obespechenia bezopastnosty eho ekonomiky [Innovative essence of law-harmonious harmony and cognitive technologies on the way from logical centrism to system-centrism: comprehension of the essence of steady state of society and ensuring the security of its economy].Ekonomicheskaia bezopastnost: novaia paradyhma formirivania i obespechenia – Economic security: new paradigma formation and support. Edited by EM. Soroko, I.V. Belousova, T.I. Egorova-Gudkova. Одесса: Institut kreativnyh tehnoloij, (pp. 22-110). 
68. Sytnikov, V.V. (2012). Systemna paradyhma v sektoralʹniy sferi ekonomiky [System paradigm in the sectoral economy]. Stratehiya rozvytku Ukrayiny. Ekonomika, sotsiolohiya, pravo – Strategy of development of Ukraine. Economics, sociology, law, 1,228-232. Retrieved from http://jrnl.nau.edu.ua/index.php/SR/article/view/6130/6860 [in Ukrainian].
69. Shhedrovickij, G.P., & Zinchenko A.P. (2012). Putivoditel po metodologii Orhanizatsii, Rukovodstva I Upravleniia. [Guidebook on the methodology of the Organization, Direction and Management].Moscow: Alpina Publisher [in Russian].
70. Vartsaba, V.I. (2015). Kategoriya interesu yak ob’yekt garmonizovanogo upravlinnya i menedzhmentu [Category of interest as an object of harmonized management and management]. Ekonomichny`j analiz – Economic analysis, 1 (21), 15-25. Ternopil’: Ekonomichna dumka [In Ukrainian]
71. Vladimirov, V., & Stakhov A. Entropia zolotoho sechenia (raskryta etsche odna taina zolotoho sechenia) [Entropy of the golden section (one more mystery of the golden section is revealed)]. Retrieved from http://w.trinitas.ru/rus/doc/0232/009a/1199-ent.pdf  
72. Voitko, S.V., & Kravchenko, M.O. (2017). Analiz mekhanizmu formuvannya ekonomichnoyi stiykosti mashynobudivnykh pidpryyemstv (neosystemnyy pidkhid) [The analysis of the mechanism of formation of economic stability of machine-building enterprises (non-system approach)].Marketynh i menedzhment innovatsiy – Marketing and Innovation Management,2,211-221.
73. Voroshan, A.D. (2014). Systemna ekonomika yak platforma rozvytku suchasnoyi ekonomichnoyi teoriyi [System economics as a platform for the development of modern economic theory].Naukovyy visnyk Bukovynsʹkoho derzhavnoho finansovo-ekonomichnoho universytetu –Scientific Bulletin Bukovinsky State Financial-Economic University. Economic Sciences, 27,423-429.Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nvbdfa_2014_27_65 [in Ukrainian].
74. Vyatkin, V.B., Zadacha otsenky nehentropii otrazhenia systemnykh obiektov i tradytsionnye podhody k kolichistvennomu opredeleniu informatsii [The problem Of Evaluation of Ngentropy Reflection Of System Objects and Traditional Approaches To Quantitative Determination Of Information]. Retrieved from http://vbvvbv.narod.ru/problemnegentropy/combinatory/index.html
75. Zemtsov, S.P, & Barinova, V.A. Innovatsionniy tsikl kak bazovaya model dinamiki i orhanizatsii innivatsionnoy deiatiolnosti [Innovation cycle as the basic model of dynamics and organization of innovation activity]. Vestnik Instituta economiki Rosiyskoy akademii nauk, 1, 117-127. Retrieved from https://www.ranepa.ru/images/docs/nayka/Barinova_02.pdf [in Russian].