Abstract

This paper summarizes the arguments and counterarguments within the scientific discussion on the issue of eco-consumers purchase decisions through the lens of consumer preferences and patterns of information processing in the course of eco-friendly brands purchase. The main purpose of the research is to bridge the gap in understanding why shoppers in India despite high environmental awareness and positive attitudes practice sustainable consumer behaviour by consuming less than better. Systematization of literary sources and approaches for solving the problem of the low frequency of eco-shopping indicates that positive attitudes and purchase intentions correspond with environmental concerns, however, they are not manifested in more frequent purchase actions. The relevance of the solution of this scientific problem is that it gives orientation to the firms on a better understanding of eco-market in India. Investigation of the topic reveals high ambiguity in buying decisions among young eco-buyers, who are ready to consume more but find it difficult due to high price, poor quality and distribution models of eco-firms. The research established the negligible impact of family members and friends as role models for promoting green sales. Methodological tools of the research methods were comparative studies, regression analysis, Principal Component Analysis and ANOVA to establish the effects of information processing and consumer preferences on the frequency of eco-friendly brands purchasing. The object of research is eco-consumers residing in Delhi and NCR because namely they are more educated and have better access to green products. Convenient sampling covered 194 respondents and was conducted in 2018. The paper presents the results of an empirical analysis of the effects of consumer preferences on the frequency of eco-shopping actions, which showed a significant relationship between purchase frequency and level of environmental concerns. The research empirically confirms and theoretically proves that increasing demand for information about eco-brands does not lead to more often shopping. The results of the research can be useful for eco-firms to enhance marketing-mix capable to offer competitive price, quality, distribution and communication with customers.

Keywords: consumer preferences, decision-making process, eco-friendly brand, eco-purchase frequency, green marketing, information processing, purchase intentions.

JEL Classification: M31, D11.

Cite as: Olasiuk, H., & Bhardwaj, U. (2019). An exploration of issues affecting consumer purchase decisions towards eco-friendly brands. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 173-184. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.2-15

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980). Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: A protocol analysis. Journal of consumer research, 7(3), 234-248.
2. Bruce, C. & Laroiya, A. (2007). The Production of Eco-Labels. Environmental and ResourceEconomics, p. 275-293. 
3. Capon, N. & Burke, M. (1980). Individual, Product class, and task-related factors in consumer information processing. The journal of consumer research, pp. 314-326.
4. Changhyun, N., Huanjiao, D. & Young-A, L. (2017). Factors influencing consumers’ purchase intention of green sportswear. Fashion and Textiles, 4(2), pp. 1-17.
5. Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Sinkovics, R. R., & Bohlen, G. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business research, 56(6), 465-480.
6. D’Souza, C., Taghian, M., Lamb, P. & Peretiatkos, R. (2006). Green products and corporate strategy: an empirical investigation. Society and business review, pp. 144-157. 
7. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993).The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
8. Erwann, C. (2009). Eco-labelling: A new deal for a more durable fishery management?. Ocean & Coastal Management,pp. 250-257.
9. Evanschitzky, H. & Wunderlich, M. (2006). An examination of moderator effects in the four-stage loyalty model. Journal of Service Research, pp. 330-345.
10. Gan, C., Wee, H. Y., Ozanne, L. & Kao, T.-H. (2008). Consumers’ purchasing behavior towards green products in New Zealand. Innovative Marketing, pp. 93-102. 
11. Gilly, M. C. & Zeithaml, V. A. (1985). The Elderly Consumer and Adoption of Technologies.Journal of Consumer Research, pp. 353-357. 
12. Gouin, S., Charles, E. & Boude, J. (2006). Market trends of seafood products under international constraints: contractualisation, marketing strategies and new behaviours. Marketing Dynamics within the Global Trading System: New Perspectives, pp. 1-17.
13. Han, H., Hsu, L., Lee, J. & Sheu, C. (2011). Are lodging customers ready to go green? An examination of attitudes, demographics, and eco-friendly intentions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, pp. 345-355. 
14. Hartmann, P., Apaolaza Ibáñez, V. & Forcada Sainz, F. J. (2005). Green branding effects on attitude: functional versus emotional positioning strategies. Marketing Intelligence & Planning,pp. 9-29. 
15. Jacoby, J. (1977). The Emerging Behavioral Process Technology in Consumer Decision-Making Research. Association for Consumer Research, pp. 263-265. 
16. Kotler, P. & Armstrong, G. (2008). Principles Of Marketing. s.l.:Prentice Hall.
17. Kumar, P. K., & Anand, B. (2014). A Study on Consumer Behavior towards Eco-Friendly Paper. Global Journal of Management And Business Research, 13(11), pp. 9-14.
18. Laroche, M., Bergeron, J. & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, pp. 503-520.
19. Loureiro, M. L., McCluskey, J. J. & Mittelhammer, R. C., (2001). Assessing Consumer Preferences for Organic, Eco-labeled, and Regular Apples. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 26(2), pp. 404-416.
20. Lusk, J. L., McLaughlin, L. & Jaeger, S. R. (2007). Strategy and Response to Purchase Intention Questions. Marketing Letters, 18(1-2), pp. 31-44.
21. Lynch, J. G. & Srull, T. K. (1982). Memory and Attentional Factors in Consumer Choice: Concepts and Research Methods. Journal of Consumer Research, pp. 18-37.
22. Mainieri, T., Barnett, E. G., Valdero, T. R., Unipan, J. B., & Oskamp, S. (1997). Green buying: The influence of environmental concern on consumer behavior. The Journal of social psychology, 137(2), 189-204.
23. Padmavathi, D. (2015). Green Consumer Behaviour – An empirical study with respect to select eco-friendly products, Coimbatore: Shodhganga INFLIBNET.
24. Palevich, R. (2011). The Lean Sustainable Supply Chain: How to Create a Green Infrastructure with Lean Technologies. s.l.:s.n.
25. Paul, J. & Rana, J. (2012). Consumer behaviour and purchase intention for organic food. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(6), pp. 412-422.
26. Paul, J., Modi, A. & Patel, J. (2016). Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behaviour and reasoned action. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Volume 29, pp. 123-134.
27. Polonsky, M. J. (2011). Transformative green marketing: Impediments and opportunities.Journal of Business Research, pp. 1311-1319.
28. Prakash, G., & Pathak, P. (2017). Intention to buy eco-friendly packaged products among young consumers of India: A study on developing nation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 385-393.
29. Raaij, W. F. (1977). Consumer Information Processing For Different Information Structures and Formats. Advances in Consumer Research, pp. 176-184.
30. Ratchford, B. T., Talukdar, D. & Lee, M.-S. (2001). A Model of Consumer Choice of the Internet as an Information Source. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, pp. 7-21.
31. Rex, E. & Baumann, H. (2007). Beyond ecolabels: what green marketing can learn from conventional marketing. Journal of Cleaner Production, pp. 567-576.
32. Ryan, M. J. & Bonfield, E. H. (1975). The Fishbein Extended Model and Consumer Behavior.Journal of Consumer Research, p. 118–136.
33. Salvatore, D. (2008). Consumer Preferences and Choice. In: Microeconomics Theory and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 70-84.
34. Schmidt, J. B. & Spreng, R. A. (1996). A Proposed Model of External Consumer Information Search. Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, pp. 246-256.
35. Sirieix, L. & Remaud, H. (2010). Consumer perceptions of eco‐friendly vs. conventional wines in Australia. Auckland, New Zeland, 5th International Academy of Wine Business Research Conference.
36. Singh, N., & Gupta, K. (2013). Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour of Indian consumers. Social Responsibility Journal, 9(1), 4-18.
37. Thaller, R. & Sunstein, C. (2009). Nudge Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. 2nd ed. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
38. Tracy, A. P., & Oskamp, S. (1984). Relationships among ecologically responsible behaviors. Journal of Environmental Systems, 13(2), 115-126.
39. Wagner, S. S. (2002). Understanding Green Consumer Behaviour. A qualitative cognitive approach. 2nd ed. New York: Taylor&Francis. 
40. Wilkie, W. L. & Pessemier, E. A. (1973). Issues in Marketing’s Use of Multi-Attribute Attitude Models. Journal of Marketing Research, pp. 428-441.
41. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2008). Sustainable Consumption Factsand Trends, Switzerland: Atar Roto Presse SA.
42. Wright, P. L. (1974). The harassed decision maker: Time pressures, distractions, and the use of evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, pp. 555-561.