Abstract

Together with the increasing health awareness levels of consumers’, artificial food additives have been highly criticized by the public. However, these kinds of sweeteners are still being used widely all over the world. One of the sectors that prefer mostly these kinds of sweeteners is the soft drink industry. High fructose corn syrup, which has been associated with serious health problems recently, is one of these additives which is highly preferred in the soft drink industry. Upon examining the situation, it is understood that there is a conflict between the implementations of the soft drink industry and consumer attitudes towards them. However, it is seen that the consumers’ perspective is not clarified enough empirically in terms of this issue. This means that the players of the soft drink industry have a lack of insight in terms of consumer thoughts and attitudes regarding artificial sweetener usage in soft drinks. Owing to this research gap in the literature and the importance of the subject in terms of consumer well-being, this study aims to explore the antecedents for the acceptance of high fructose corn syrup usage in soft drinks. To reach this aim, four research questions represented to understand how frequent consumers prefer soft drinks containing high fructose corn syrup, to reveal consumers’ attitudes and acceptance towards high fructose corn syrup and to understand how nutritional knowledge and nutritional information interest affect consumers’ acceptance specifically on high fructose corn syrup usage in soft drinks. To answer these questions, a structured survey was developed and conducted on 888 soft drink consumers who are aware of high fructose corn syrup in soft drinks as an additive. Then, a number of analyses were conducted with the data obtained. According to the results, it is seen that although participants have a quite negative attitude towards HFCS usage in soft drinks (2.13 out of seven points Likert), more than half of them (53%) declared that they frequently buy soft drinks that contain HFCS. As to the hypothesis of the research, it is concluded that nutritional knowledge and nutritional information interest were both negatively affects consumer acceptance of high fructose corn syrup usage in soft drinks. The results suggest that the antecedents studied in this paper are both significant. Thus the two hypotheses of the study were supported. Obtaining these findings, this study contributes to the literature by creating insight in terms of consumer acceptance of artificial sweetener usage in soft drinks which is crucial especially in terms of consumer health.

Keywords: artificial sweeteners, consumer acceptance, consumer health, food additives, soft drinks

JEL Classification: M31, L66.

Cite as: Arslan, Y. (2019). Exploring the effects of consumers’ nutritional knowledge and information interest on the acceptance of artificial sweetener usage in soft drinks. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 33-44. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.3-03

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W., 1988. Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), p.411.
2. Balasubramanian, S.K. and Cole, C., 2002. Consumers’ search and use of nutrition information: The challenge and promise of the nutrition labeling and education act. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), pp.112-127.
3. Barreiro-Hurle, J., Gracia, A., and De-Magistris, T. (2010). Does nutrition information on food products lead to healthier food choices?. Food Policy, 35(3), pp.221-229.
4. Basu, S., McKee, M., Galea, G. and Stuckler, D., 2013. Relationship of soft drink consumption to global overweight, obesity, and diabetes: a cross-national analysis of 75 countries. American Journal of Public Health, 103(11), pp.2071-2077.
5. Bearth, A., Cousin, M.E. and Siegrist, M., 2014. The consumer’s perception of artificial food additives: Influences on acceptance, risk and benefit perceptions. Food Quality and Preference, 38, pp.14-23.
6. Beghin, J.C., 2016. Biofuel and Feedstock Markets and the EU-US TTIP. Agricultural Policy Review, 2016(1), p. 2.
7. Bere, E., Glomnes, E.S., te Velde, S.J. and Klepp, K.I., 2008. Determinants of adolescents’ soft drink consumption. Public Health Nutrition, 11(1), pp.49-56.
8. Bonsmann, S.S., Celemin, L.F., Larranaga, A., Egger, S., Wills, J.M., Hodgkins, C. and Raats, M.M., 2010. Penetration of nutrition information on food labels across the EU-27 plus Turkey. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 64(12), p.1379.
9. Bray, G.A., 2013. Energy and fructose from beverages sweetened with sugar or high-fructose corn syrup pose a health risk for some people. Advances in Nutrition, 4(2), pp. 220-225
10. Bray, G.A., Nielsen, S.J. and Popkin, B.M., 2004. Consumption of high-fructose corn syrup in beverages may play a role in the epidemic of obesity. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 79(4), pp.537-543.
11. Brown, K., McIlveen, H. and Strugnell, C., 2000. Nutritional awareness and food preferences of young consumers. Nutrition & Food Science, 30(5), pp.230-235.
12. Cohen, J., 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. LEA.
13. Cohen, P., West, S.G. and Aiken, L.S., 2014. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Psychology Press.
14. Coviello, N.E., Brodie, R.J., Danaher, P.J. and Johnston, W.J., 2002. How firms relate to their markets: an empirical examination of contemporary marketing practices. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), pp.33-46.
15. Desai, K.K. and Ratneshwar, S., 2003. Consumer perceptions of product variants positioned on atypical attributes. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(1), pp.22-35.
16. Douglas, M. and Isherwood, B., 2002. The world of goods. Routledge.
17. Eiser, J.R., Miles, S. and Frewer, L.J., 2002. Trust, Perceived Risk, and Attitudes Toward Food Technologies 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(11), pp.2423-2433.
18. Europa.eu., 2017. [cited 2019 Jan 09]. Available from: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-17-3488_en.htm
19. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F., 1981. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, pp.382-388.
20. Forshee, R.A., Storey, M.L., Allison, D.B., Glinsmann, W.H., Hein, G.L., Lineback, D.R., Miller, S.A., Nicklas, T.A., Weaver, G.A. and White, J.S., 2007. A critical examination of the evidence relating high fructose corn syrup and weight gain. Critical Reviews in Food Science And Nutrition, 47(6), pp.561-582.
21. Gib.gov.tr., 2018. [cited 2019 Jan 07]. Available from: http://www.gib.gov.tr/fileadmin/mevzuatek/otv_oranlari_tum/03_ 07_2018_III_sayili_liste.pdf
22. Gidahatti.com., 2018. [cited 2019 Jan 07]. Available from: https://www.gidahatti.com/turkler-gida-secimlerini-neye-gore-yapiyor-79870/
23. Grunert, K.G. and Wills, J.M., 2007. A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels. Journal of Public Health, 15(5), pp.385-399.
24. Grunert, K.G., Wills, J.M. and Fernández-Celemin, L., 2010. Nutrition knowledge, and use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels among consumers in the UK. Appetite, 55(2), pp.177-189.
25. Hawkes, C., 2010. The worldwide battle against soft drinks in schools. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 38(4), pp.457-461.
26. Hawley, K.L., Roberto, C.A., Bragg, M.A., Liu, P.J., Schwartz, M.B. and Brownell, K.D., 2013. The science on front-of-package food labels. Public Health Nutrition, 16(3), pp.430-439.
27. Isosugar.org., 2018. Quarterly Market Outlook, [cited 2019 Jan 05]. Available from: https://www.isosugar.org/publication/101/ iso-quarterly-market-outlook—february-2018
28. Machin, L., Aschemann-Witzel, J., Curutchet, M.R., Gimenez, A. and Ares, G., 2018. Does front-of-pack nutrition information improve consumer ability to make healthful choices? Performance of warnings and the traffic light system in a simulated shopping experiment. Appetite, 121, pp.55-62.
29. Martins, Y., Pelchat, M.L. and Pliner, P., 1997. “Try it; it’s good and it’s good for you”: Effects of taste and nutrition information on willingness to try novel foods. Appetite, 28(2), pp.89-102.
30. Mitchell, V.W. and Walsh, G., 2004. Gender differences in German consumer decision‐making styles. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 3(4), pp.331-346.
31. Murray, J.Y., Kotabe, M. and Zhou, J.N., 2005. Strategic alliance-based sourcing and market performance: evidence from foreign firms operating in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2), pp.187-208.
32. Murray, J., Elms, J. and Teller, C., 2017. Examining the role of store design on consumers’ cross-sectional perceptions of retail brand loyalty. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 38, pp.147-156.
33. Nseir, W., Nassar, F. and Assy, N., 2010. Soft drinks consumption and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World Journal of Gastroenterology: WJG, 16(21), p.2579.
34. O’Cass, A., Jin Lee, W. and Siahtiri, V., 2013. Can Islam and status consumption live together in the house of fashion clothing?. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 17(4), pp.440-459.
35. Pettigrew, S., Jongenelis, M., Chapman, K. and Miller, C., 2015. Factors influencing the frequency of children’s consumption of soft drinks. Appetite, 91, pp.393-398.
36. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y. and Podsakoff, N.P., 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), p.879.
37. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. and Müller, H., 2003. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), pp.23-74.
38. Schmider, E., Ziegler, M., Danay, E., Beyer, L. and Bühner, M., 2010. Is it really robust?. Methodology.
39. Siders, M.A., George, G. and Dharwadkar, R., 2001. The relationship of internal and external commitment foci to objective job performance measures. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), pp.570-579.
40. Spronk, I., Kullen, C., Burdon, C. and O’Connor, H., 2014. Relationship between nutrition knowledge and dietary intake. British Journal of Nutrition, 111(10), pp.1713-1726.
41. Stern, T., Haas, R. and Meixner, O., 2009. Consumer acceptance of wood-based food additives. British Food Journal, 111(2), pp.179-195.
42. Tarnavolgyi, G., 2003. Analysis of consumers attitudes towards food additives using focus group survey. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, 68(3), pp.193-196.
43. Teksoz, F., 2018. [cited 2019 Jan 06]. Available from: http://gidabilgi.com/Makale/Detay/nisasta-bazli-seker-sektoru-dc243b
44. TUIK, 2018. Demographics in Turkey, [cited 2019 Feb 15]. Available from: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/UstMenu.do?metod=temelist,
45. Turkish Ministry of Education, 2016. [cited 2019 Feb 16]. Available from: http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/dosyalar/1770.pdf,
46. Turkseker.gov.tr., 2018. Sector report, [cited 2019 Jan 09]. Available from: https://www.turkseker.gov.tr/sector-report-2018.pdf
47. Vartanian, L.R., Schwartz, M.B. and Brownell, K.D., 2007. Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 97(4), pp.667-675.
48. Williams, P.G., Stirling, E. and Keynes, N., 2004. Food fears: a national survey on the attitudes of Australian adults about the safety and quality of food. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 3(1), pp. 32-39.
49. World health organisation, 2015. Sugar intake for adults and children, [cited 2019 Jan 09]. Available from:http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/149782/9789241549028_eng.pdf; jsessionid=B77D9E85AB4165852A6EC2E7FA438D1D?sequence=1