Abstract

This article substantiates the content basis of application of the foresight methodology in the forestry complex in the context of sustainable spatial forestry management. Socio-ecological and economic effectiveness of sustainable forestry is determined by the completeness of continuous and non-exhaustive use of all components of forest ecosystems, including non-market, at all levels of spatial development (local, regional, national and global). It stipulates the high responsibility of the world community, society, state, local authorities and businesses for political, institutional, economic, technological, and project decisions in the sphere of forestry management in the spatial-temporal dimension. It leads to the need for qualitative forecasting of the future sustainable development of the forestry complex, which determines the search and application of modern effective approaches to strategic planning and management of the forestry complex, among which foresight is particularly highlighted. Thus, the paper considers the key features of foresight, which must be taken into account when investigating the future vision of sustainable spatial development of forestry. Thus, the purpose of this study is to generalize and identify the features and possibilities of using the foresight methodology in the forestry complex in the context of sustainable spatial development. The particular features of nature management in the forestry complex in the process of foresight research should be taken into consideration. Existing principles and classification signs for the foresight are presented in the context of sustainable forestry. The application of existing foresight methods is implemented on the example of using the scenario approach to the substantiation of organizational and economic conditions for the formation and development of ecosystem entrepreneurship. At the same time, we have considered the application of the scenario approach within the framework of solving the problem of forest ecosystem business development. The development of entrepreneurship on the ecological and economic basis should become a qualitatively new and effective type of forestry management based on the use of advanced, innovative methods, forms, methods of production organization and combination of resources. The variable development of the use of the scenario approach to the substantiation of organizational and economic conditions for the formation and development of forest ecosystem entrepreneurship has been presented. Thus, the use of various foresight technologies (in particular, the scenario approach) will provide a qualitatively new level of constructive substantiation, in particular, the national strategy for sustainable forestry and long-term forestry programs on an innovative basis.

Keywords: foresight, forestry complex, sustainable spatial forestry, foresight principles, foresight classification, scenario, ecosystem entrepreneurship

JEL Classification: Q20, Q21, Q23.

Cite as: Mishenin, Y., Yarova, I. & Mishenina, H. (2019). Features of foresight methodology application in the forestry complex of Ukraine: sectoral and spatial aspect. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 229-240. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.4-18

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Gohberg, L. (2007). Buduschee kak strategicheskaya zadacha (The future as a strategic task). Forsayt – Foresight, 1, 4-5 (in Russian).
2. Pisarenko, A.I., Strahov, V.V. (2008). Tehnologiya predvideniya i buduschee lesnogo hozyaystva (Tehnologiya predvideniya i buduschee lesnogo hozyaystva). Lesnoe hozyaystvo – Forestry, 6, 2-6 (in Russian).
3. Kirnos, I.O. (2013). Forsait yak instrument stratehichnoho planuvannia. (Foresight as a strategic planning instrument). Innovatsiina ekonomika – Innovative economy, 6, 2-6 (in Ukrainian).
4. Cuosa, T. (2011). Practicing strategic foresight in government. The cases of Finland, Singapore and European Union / Tuomo Cuosa. Singapore: S. Rajaratnam Studies, 116 p.
5. Popper, R. (2008). How are foresight methods selected? Foresight. Vol. 10, 54-59.
6. Habegger, B. (2010). Strategic forеsight in public policy: reviewing the experiences of the UK, Singaporeand the Netherlands. Futures, 42, 49-58.
7. Hideg, E. (2007). Theory and practice in the field of foresight. Foresight, (6), 36-46.
8. Rudakevych, O., Biskun, V (2015). Osoblyvosti vykorystannia forsaitu v peredbachenni ta rozviazanni problem u sotsialnii sferi (Features of using foresight in predicting and solving problems in the social sphere). Sotsiolohichni studii – Sociological studios, 2, 77-83 (in Ukrainian).
9. Gluschenko, O.V. (2018). Primenenie akseleratora ustoychivogo razvitiya v forsayte natsionalnogo blagosostoyaniya Ukrainy (Application of the accelerator of sustainable development in the foresight of the national well-being of Ukraine). Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 391-405 (in Russian).
10. Tsedik, M.H. (2016). Pozvytok rehionalnoho forsaitu yak zasobu terytorialnoho upravlinnia (Development of regional foresight as a means of territorial administration): diss. … cand.public.admin.: 25.00.02 / Mariia Herasymivna Tsedik. Kyiv, 205 p (in Ukrainian).
11. Kravchenko, T.A. (2015). Dotsilnist vykorystannia metodolohii forsaitu pry rozrobtsi yedynoi kompleksnoi stratehii rozvytku silskoho hospodarstva ta silskykh terytorii na 2015-2020 rr. (The expediency of using the foresight methodology in the development of the Integrated Integrated Strategy for the Development of Agriculture and Rural Territories for 2015-2020). Aspekty publichnoho upravlinnia – Aspects of public administration, 4(18),121 (in Ukrainian).
12. Obykhod, H.O. (2016). Prohnozuvannia stanu navkolyshnoho pryrodnoho seredovyshcha iz zastosuvanniam forsait-metodolohii (Forecasting the state of the environment using foresight methodology). Ekolohichna modernizatsiia v systemi pryrodno-tekhnohennoi ta ekolohichnoi bezpeky (Ecological modernization in the system of natural and man-made and ecological safety): monograph / Ed. by prof. M.A. Khvesyk. Kyiv, 345-352 (in Ukrainian).
13. Hubanova, O.R., Demianenko, S.H. (2016). Forsait yak instrument zabezpechennia sotsialno-ekolohichnoi vidpovidalnosti (Foresight as a tool for ensuring social and environmental responsibility). Stalyi rozvytok – KhKhI stolittia: upravlinnia, tekhnolohii, modeli. Dyskusii 2016 (Sustainable development – XXI century: management, technology, models. Discussions, 2016): monograph / Ed. by Doctor of Economic Sciences, Prof. Ye.V. Khlobystov. Cherkasy:Chabanenko Yu., Part 1.1. (1.7.), 91-102 (in Ukrainian).
14. Strahov, V.V. (2008). Forsayt v lesnom sektore stran Evropeyskogo Soyuza (Foresight in the forestry sector of the European Union). Forsayt – Foresight, 3(7), 10-15 (in Russian).
15. Karpuk, A.I. (2012). Zarubizhnyi dosvid vykorystannia forsait-tekhnolohii u lisovomu hospodarstvi (Foreign experience of using foresight technologies in forestry). Naukovyi visnyk NLTU Ukrainy – Scientific Bulletin of the National Forestry University of Ukraine, 22.2, 7-42 (in Ukrainian).
16. Kvitka, S.A. (2016). Forsait yak tekhnolohiia proektuvannia maibutnoho: novitni mekhanizmy vzaiemodii publichnoi vlady, biznesu ta hromadianskoho pidkhodu (Foresight as a technology for future design: the latest mechanisms of interaction between public authority, businesses and civic approach). Aspekty publichnoho upravlinnia – Aspects of public administration, 8 (34), 5-15 (in Ukrainian).
17. Mushchynska, N.Iu. (2015). Vprovadzhennia forsaitu v upravlinniia sotsialno-ekonomichnym rozvytkom rehionu (Implementation of foresight in the management of the socio-economic development of the region). Visnyk skhidnoukrainskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. Volodymyra Dalia – Bulletin of the East-Ukrainian National University after V. Dahl, 6. (223), 98-102.
18. Martin,Ben R. (2002). Technology foresight in a rapidly globalizing. – International Practice in Technology Foresight. Vienna: UNIDO,14 p.
19. Klimova, N.V. (2012). Integratsiya tehnologii forsayta i tsiklichnosti razvitiya ekonomiki (Integration of foresight technology and cyclical economic development). Byuleten Mizhnarodnogo Nobelivskogo ekonomIchnogo forumu – Bulletin of the International Nobel Economic Forum,1(15),1,209-213 (in Russian).
20. Yarova,I.Ye., Mishenina, N.V., Pizniak, T.I. (2018). Prostorovyi analiz vidtvorennia lisoresursnoho potentsialu: ekoloho-ekonomichnyi aspekt. (Spatial analysis of the reproduction of forest resource potential: the ecological and economic aspect). Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1,406-418 (in Ukrainian).
21. Petrov, V.N. (2004). Osnovyi politiki gosudarstva v oblasti lesnyih otnosheniy (Basics of state policy in the forestry). Lesnoe hozyaystvo-Forestry, 4, 2-4 (in Ukrainian).
22. Mishenin, Ye.V., Mishenina, N.V., Yarova, I.Ye. (2011). Rozvytok marketynhu ekosystemnoi produktsii ta posluh u lisoresursnii sferi (Development of marketing of ecosystem products and services in the forest resource sector). Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2,209-219 (in Ukrainian).
23. Suska, A.A. (2018). Instytualizatsiia lisovoho sektora ekonomiky Ukrainy u konteksti rynku sotsialno-ekolohichnykh posluh (Institutionalization of the forestry sector of Ukraine’s economy in the context of the market of social and environmental services): abstract. of diss…. for D.Sc. (Econ):08.00.03/Dniprovskyi state agro-econ.university.Dnipro,36.
24. Mishenin, Ye.V. (1998). Ekologo-ekonomicheskie problemyi prirodopolzovaniya v lesnom komplekse (Ecological and economic problems of nature management in the forest complex): monograph / Ed. by Doctor of Economic Sciences, Prof. Koval Ya. V. Sumy: VTD «Mriya – 1» LTD, 272 (in Russian).
25. Malinovskaya, O. V., Skobeleva, I.P. (2014). Forsayt kak tehnologiya strategicheskogo planirovaniya i upravleniya (Foresight as a technology of strategic planning and management). Finansy ta kredyt – Finance and credit, 32(608),2 (in Russian).
26. Miles, I. (2004). Three Worlds of Foresight. EU-US Seminar: New Technology Foresight, Forecasting & Assessment Methods. Seville, 24-43. Retrieved from http://foresight.jrc.ec.europa.eu/fta/papers/Keynotes/Three Worlds of Foresight.pdf
27. Yarova, I.Ye. (2018). Forsaitna metodolohiia v systemi transformatsii prostorovoho rozvytku lisovoho kompleksu Ukrainy (Foresight methodology in the system of transformation of spatial development of forestry complex in Ukraine). Balanced natural resources: traditions, perspectives and innovations: Proceedings of the II International scientific-practical conference (Kyiv, December 21, 2018). Kyiv: DIA, 97-99 (in Ukrainian).
28. Moiseev, N.A. (2010). Lesnaya ekonomika: problemyi i resheniya (Forestry: Problems and Solutions). Lesnoe hozyaystvo – Forestry, 2, 34-38 (in Russian).
29. Antonenko, I.Ya. (2008). Ekoloho-ekonomichni priorytety modernizatsii lisoresursnoho kompleksu Ukrainy: makroekonomichni vazheli (Ecological and economic priorities of modernization of the forest resource complex of Ukraine: macroeconomic levers) / Ed. by Doctor of Economic Sciences, Prof. B.M. Danylyshyn. Kyiv: KUTEP – Inform, 359 (in Ukrainian).
30. Tretyak, V.P. (2015). Territorialnyie forsaytyi: opyit provedeniya, ozhidaniya i grazhdan i vlasti (Territorial foresight: experience of holding, expectations and citizens and power). Moscow: Znaniya, 215 (in Russian).
31. Sokolov, A.V. (2007). Vzglyad v buduschee (Looking into the future). Forsayt – Foresight, 1, 1-8 (in Russian).
32. Vasylkonova, E. (2014). Vykorystannia metodiv forsaitu u formuvanni pozytyvnoho imidzhu rehioniv (Using foresight methods in forming a positive image of regions). Proceedings of the ChSTU, 37(part II),140-145 (in Ukrainian).
33. Haponenko, N.V. (2012). Foresight. Theory. Methodology. Experience. Мoscow: Yunyty-Dana, 238 p. (in Russian).
34. The state of the world’s forests 2009 / Food and agriculture organization of United Nations. Rome, 2009, 178 p.
35. Mishenin, Ye.V.,Yarova,I.Ye. (2009) Ecological Economic Principles of Integrated Process Management for Forestry and Agriculture. Ecological economics and sustainable forest management: developing a transdisciplinary approach for the Carpathian Mountains:monograph. Lviv: Ukrainian National Forestry University Press, Liga-Pres, 432 р. (in English).
36. Khvesik, M.A, Bistryakov, I.K, Kapnova, D.V. (2016) Spatial organization and directions of use of natural wealth of Ukraine. Economy of Ukraine. №7 (48). pp.46-65 (in English).
37. Mishenin, Ye.V, Mishenina, H.A., Yarova, I.Ye. (2011). Conceptual and methodological bases of entrepreneurship development in forestry on the ecological and economic principles (Conceptual and methodological bases of entrepreneurship development in forestry on ecological and economic basis). Naukovyi visnyk NLTU Ukrainy – Scientific Bulletin of the National Forestry University of Ukraine, Issue 21.19, 182-196 (in Ukrainian).
38. Finansovo-ekonomichnyi mekhanizm upravlinnia terytorialnymy pryrodno-hospodarskymy kompleksamy (Financial and economic mechanism of management of territorial natural and economic complexes) / Ed. by Doctor of Economic Sciences, Prof. M.A. Khvesyk. Kyiv: DU IEPSR NAN Ukrainy, 2016. 528 (in Ukrainian).