Abstract

The environmental concern has become the top trend nowadays and the ideas of environmental protection, green orientation and green innovation, highly concern from the last few decades in all research areas. The construction industry is one of those that has a very strong impact on the environment. Air, water, noise and vibration, as well as soil pollution caused during construction processes, negatively impact on the environment and its natural ecosystems, as well as on humans at a global level. Construction waste generated during the construction, renovation and demolition process occupies huge landfills due to significant volumes. It may also contain substances that are hazardous to the environment and human health. This paper summarizes the research results on the possibilities for more efficient construction waste management as well as the experience of companies operating in the construction sector with a purpose to reduce the causes of pollution. The data obtained within the framework of the survey on people’s understanding in the field of construction pollution and waste in Latvia have been analyzed. The main goal of the study is to present the main findings of the authors’ survey and to discuss the current construction waste management challenges and potential innovations in Latvia. The authors used the following research methods: literature review, analysis of statistical data; questionnaire creation and conduction a survey; interviews with waste management companies. The research was conducted during the period from October 2019 to July 2020. The obtained results showed that there was a huge potential for innovation because the current situation was far from ideal. The results of an empirical analysis demonstrated that the collection of sorted construction waste on construction sites currently was practically impossible, as the industry points to the human factor in the waste sorting process. Although the data obtained within the framework of the survey clearly indicated the interest of employees in sorting construction waste already on the construction site, waste industry companies currently consider such a practice impossible also due to the influence of other side factors related to economic considerations. It is necessary to develop a normative framework for the implementation of the construction waste certification system to promote the reuse of construction waste in construction as efficiently as possible. 

Keywords: construction waste, management of technological innovation, environmental management, Latvia, sustainable development.

JEL Classification: L74, Q53, Q55, M11, O32.

Cite as: Tambovceva, T., Urbane, V., & Levins, J. (2020). Innovations in construction waste management: case of Latvia. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 234-248. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2020.3-17

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Alhadid, A. Y., & Abu-Rumman, A. H. (2014). The Impact of Green Innovation on Organizational Performance, Environmental Management Behavior as a Moderate Variable: An Analytical Study on Nuqul Group in Jordan. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(7), 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
2. Campos, L. M., Trierweiller, A. C., de Carvalho, D. N., & Selih, J. (2016). Environmental management systems in the construction industry: a review. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 15(2), 453-460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
3. Chen, J., & Liu, L. (2018). Profiting from green innovation: The moderating effect of competitive strategy. Sustainability, 11(1), 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
4. Chen, Y. S., & Chang, K. C. (2013). The nonlinear effect of green innovation on the corporate competitive advantage. Quality & Quantity, 47(1), 271-286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
5. Chen, Y. S., Lai, S. B., & Wen, C. T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of business ethics, 67(4), 331-339. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
6. Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2009). Business research: A practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students. Macmillan International Higher Education. [Google Scholar]
7. Cooper, D., & Schindler, P. (2011). Business research methods. 11th Edition. Boston: McGraw Hill. [Google Scholar]
8. Couto, J. P., & Mendonça, P. (2011). Deconstruction Roles in the Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Portugal-From Design to Site Management. Integrated Waste Management, 1, 301. [Google Scholar]
9. Cox, M. (2018). Waste management on construction sites. International Institute of Risk and Safety Management.
10. CustomInsight. (2019). Survey Random Sample Calculator. Retrieved from https://www.custominsight.com/articles/random-sample-calculator.asp
11. European Commission. (2016). EU Construction & Demolition Waste Management Protocol. Retrieved June 17, 2020, from https://ec.europa.eu/growth/content/eu-construction-and-demolition-waste-protocol-0_en
12. Eurostat (2017) Waste statistics Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Waste_statistics
13. Eurostat. (2016). Waste statistics. Retrieved July 12, 2020, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=File:Waste_generation_by_economic_activities_and_households,_EU-27,_2016_(%25_share_in_tonnes).png
14. Fuertes, A., Casals, M., Gangolells, M., Forcada, N., Macarulla, M., & Roca, X. (2013). An environmental impact causal model for improving the environmental performance of construction processes. Journal of cleaner production, 52, 425-437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
15. Geetha, M., & Ambika, D. (2015). Study on noise pollution at construction site. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 4, 2319-2321. Retrieved from https://www.ijltet.org/journal_details.php?id=886&j_id=2094
16. Graudins, U. (2014). A new sector of opportunities in waste management. Retrieved from http://www.la.lv/jauna-iespeju-nozare%E2%80%A9/
17. Guoyou, Q., Saixing, Z., Chiming, T., Haitao, Y., & Hailiang, Z. (2013). Stakeholders’ influences on corporate green innovation strategy: a case study of manufacturing firms in China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(1), 1-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
18. Holman, R. (2017). No time to waste; waste diversion in construction. West Michigan. Retrieved from https://www.usgbcwm.org/no-time-to-waste-waste-diversion-in-construction/
19. Jain, G., Gupta, V., & Pandey, M. (2016). Case Study of Construction Pollution Impact on Environment. Int. J. of Emer. Tech. in Eng. Res.(IJETER), 4(6). [Google Scholar]
20. LEGMC. (2020). State limited Liability Company «Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre2. Compilation of waste statistics. Retrieved from https://www.meteo.lv/lapas/vide/atkritumi/atkritumu- statistikas-apkopojumi/atkritumu-s tatistikas-apkopojumi?id=1713&nid=380
21. Li, W., & Wang, X. (2016). Innovations on management of sustainable construction in a large earthwork project: an Australian case research. Procedia Engineering, 145(1), 677-684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
22. Likumi.lv (2010). Waste Management Law. Retrieved from https://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=221378
23. Mao, C., Shen, Q., Shen, L., & Tang, L. (2013). Comparative study of greenhouse gas emissions between off-site prefabrication and conventional construction methods: Two case studies of residential projects. Energy and Buildings, 66, 165-176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
24. MrGScience. (2015). 1.5. Humans & Pollution. Escuela Campo Alegre. Retrieved from https://www.mrgscience.com/ess-topic-15-humans-and-pollution.html
25. Norulaini, N., Rahman, N. A., & Esa, N. (2014). Sustainable living with environmental risks. Tokyo: Springer. 284 p.
26. Ponto, J. (2015). Understanding and evaluating survey research. Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 6(2), 168. [Google Scholar]
27. Quinlan, C. (2011). Business Research Methods. Hampshire, UK: Cengage Learning EMEA.
28. RecycleCoach (2016). How to reuse and recycle construction materials. Retrieved from https://recyclecoach.com/residents/blog/how-to-reuse-and-recycle-construction-materials/
29. Reja, U., Manfreda, K. L., Hlebec, V., & Vehovar, V. (2003). Open-ended vs. close-ended questions in web questionnaires. Developments in applied statistics, 19(1), 159-177. [Google Scholar]
30. Resource Efficient Scotland. (n.a.). Best practice guide to improving waste management on construction sites. Retrieved from https://www.zerowastescotland.org.uk/sites/default/files/Improving%20waste%20management%20on%20construction%20site%20%E2%80%93%20best%20practice%20guide_0.pdf
31. Sandanayake, M., Zhang, G., & Setunge, S. (2016). Environmental emissions at foundation construction stage of buildings–Two case studies. Building and Environment, 95, 189-198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
32. Sandanayake, M., Zhang, G., Setunge, S., Li, C. Q., & Fang, J. (2016). Models and method for estimation and comparison of direct emissions in building construction in Australia and a case study. Energy and Buildings, 126, 128-138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
33. Selih, J. (2007). Environmental management systems and construction SMEs: a case study for Slovenia. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 13(3), 217-226. [Google Scholar]
34. SurveyMonkey. (2019a). Closed-ended vs open-ended questions. Retrieved from https://www.surveymonkey.com/mp/comparing-closed-ended-and-open-ended-questions/
35. SurveyMonkey. (2019b). Sample size calculator. Retrieved from https://www.surveymonkey.com/mp/sample-size-calculator/
36. Tah, J. H., & Abanda, H. F. (2011). Sustainable building technology knowledge representation: Using Semantic Web techniques. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 25(3), 547-558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
37. Tambovceva, T. (2010). Assessment model of environmental management: a case study of construction enterprises in latvia. Economics & Management. [Google Scholar]
38. Tambovceva, T., & Geipele, I. (2011). Environmental management systems experience among Latvian construction companies. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17(4), 595-610. [Google Scholar]
39. Thomas, N. I. R., & Costa, D. B. (2017). Adoption of environmental practices on construction sites. Ambiente Construído, 17(4), 9-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
40. Ulubeyli, S., Kazaz, A., & Arslan, V. (2017). Construction and demolition waste recycling plants revisited: management issues. Procedia Engineering, 172, 1190-1197. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
41. VARAM. (2013). National Waste Management Plan for 2013–2020. Retrieved from http://likumi.lv/ta/id/255629-par-atkritumu-apsaimniekosanas-valsts-planu-20132020gadam
42. WALGA (n.a.). Construction waste management plan guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.wastenet.net.au/profiles/wastenet/assets/clientdata/document-centre/wal2708_construction_waste_a4_v2_singles.pdf
43. Welman, J.C., & Kruger, S.J. (2003). Research Methodology. 2nd edition. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
44. Yan, H., Shen, Q., Fan, L. C., Wang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2010). Greenhouse gas emissions in building construction: A case study of One Peking in Hong Kong. Building and Environment, 45(4), 949-955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
45. Yusof, N. A., Abidin, N. Z., Zailani, S. H. M., Govindan, K., & Iranmanesh, M. (2016). Linking the environmental practice of construction firms and the environmental behaviour of practitioners in construction projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 121, 64-71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
46. Zvirbule, L. (2016). Construction waste management: principles, requirements, problems. Valsts vides dienests. Retrieved from http://bvkb.gov.lv/sites/default/files/20161209_buvvaldes_vvd.pdf