Contents |
Authors:
Arif G. Huseynov, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0504-745Х Azerbaijan State Oil and Industry University (Azerbaijan)
Pages: 293-302
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2021.2-24
Received: 15.12.2020
Accepted: 15.05.2021
Published: 26.06.2021
Download: |
Views: |
Downloads: |
|
|
|
Abstract
Global warming and deterioration of the ecological situation trigger the necessity of innovation development and implementation to reduce the negative impact of industry on the environment. It is considered that the oil industry is one of the most environmentally damaging industries. Therefore, the implementation of environmental innovation in the oil industry becomes crucial. This paper is dedicated to identifying environmental innovation impact on country socio-economic development parameters in countries specialized in oil extraction and production. The article realized a bibliometric analysis with VOSviewer v.1.6.16 to identify critical contextual directions of scientific research on environmental innovation. In the paper, it is developed and tested a scientific hypothesis about the positive influence of environmental innovation on country socio-economic development (CO2 emissions from manufacturing industries and construction, electricity production from oil sources, employment in industry, and industry value added are chosen as proxies of environmental innovation, while GDP growth, current account balance, foreign direct investment and gross fixed capital formation – as proxies of country socio-economic development). Under testing of the research hypothesis, it is realized several procedures: 1) correlation analysis aimed at identification of strongly correlated explanatory variables and their elimination to avoid multicollinearity problem; 2) comprehensive analysis of descriptive statistics aimed at identification of data sufficiency; 3) identification of model specification with Hausman test (random or fixed effects model); 4) regression modeling and characteristics of its results (in this research, it is developed four regression models with different dependent variables). Technically all these procedures are realized in Stata 12/SE software. Research is realized based on data for 9 countries specializing in oil extraction and production, such as Azerbaijan, Canada, Brazil, the Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Romania, the Republic of Yemen, and the Islamic Republic of Iran. The time horizon is 2005-2019 (or the available last year). Bibliometric and panel data regression analysis allows concluding that oil-producing countries’ environmental innovation improves oil enterprises’ competitiveness and stimulates socio-economic growth in these countries.
Keywords: environmental innovation, socio-economic development, oil industry, panel data analysis.
JEL Classification: C33, F63, O44, O47.
Cite as: Huseynov, A. G. (2021). Impact of environmental innovation on country socio-economic development. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 293-302. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2021.2-24
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
- Berrone, P., Fosfuri, A., Gelabert, L., & Gomez‐Mejia, L. R. (2013). Necessity as the mother of ‘green’inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 34(8), 891-909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brunnermeier, S. B., & Cohen, M. A. (2003). Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. Journal of environmental economics and management, 45(2), 278-293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cainelli, G., Mazzanti, M., & Montresor, S. (2012). Environmental innovations, local networks and internationalization. Industry and Innovation, 19(8), 697-734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Marchi, V. (2012). Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Research policy, 41(3), 614-623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donlagic, A., & Moskalenko, B. A. (2020). The Impact Of FDI Inflow On The Environment: A Case Of The Baltic-Black Sea Region Countries. SocioEconomic Challenges, 4(4), 151-159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Amri, A., Boutti, R., Oulfarsi, S., Rodhain, F., & Bouzahir, B. (2020). Carbon financial markets underlying climate risk management, pricing and forecasting: Fundamental analysis. FinancialMarkets, Institutions and Risks, 4(4), 31-44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geffen, C. A., & Rothenberg, S. (2000). Suppliers and environmental innovation: the automotive paint process. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(2), 166-186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, J. (2000). Environmental supply chain dynamics. Journal of cleaner production, 8(6), 455-471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, S. (2019). The Impact of Trade on Environmental Quality: A Business Ethics Perspective and Evidence from China. Business Ethics and Leadership, 3(4), 43-48. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
- Horbach, J. (2008). Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources. Research policy, 37(1), 163-173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IEA. (2020). Global Energy Review 2020: The impacts of the COVID-19 crisis on global energy demand and CO2 emissions. Retrieved from [Link]
- IEA. (2021). World Energy Outlook special report «The Oil and Gas Industry in Energy Transitions». Retrieved from [Link]
- Karintseva, O., & Benetytė, R. (2018). Estimation of efficiency of state regulation in economic restructuring based on the environmental factor. SocioEconomic challenges (SEC), 2(1), 91-102. [Google Scholar]
- Kemp, R., & Pearson, P. (2007). Final report MEI project about measuring eco-innovation. UM Merit, Maastricht, 10(2). [Google Scholar]
- Lanjouw, J. O., & Mody, A. (1996). Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology. Research Policy, 25(4), 549-571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishenin, Y. V., Yarova, I. Y., Klisinski, J., & Rak, A. (2020). Ensuring healthy environment: mechanisms of cluster structures development in the field of waste management. Health Economics and Management Review, 1(2), 78-90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Owen, N., Humpel, N., Leslie, E., Bauman, A., & Sallis, J. F. (2004). Understanding environmental influences on walking: review and research agenda. American journal of preventive medicine, 27(1), 67-76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padel, S. (2001). Conversion to organic farming: a typical example of the diffusion of an innovation?. Sociologia ruralis, 41(1), 40-61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rennings, K., Ziegler, A., Ankele, K., & Hoffmann, E. (2006). The influence of different EU environmental management and auditing schemes on technical environmental innovations and economic performance. Ecological Economics, 57(1), 45-59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scopus (2021). Retrieved from [Link]
- Taliento, M., & Netti, A. (2020). Corporate Social/Environmental Responsibility and Value Creation: Reflections on a Modern Business Management Paradigm. Business Ethics and Leadership, 4(4), 123-131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vasylieva, T., Lyeonov, S., Lyulyov, O., & Kyrychenko, K. (2018). Macroeconomic stability and its impact on the economic growth of the country. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 14(1), 159-170. [Google Scholar] [Google Scholar]
- VOSviewer. (2021). Retrived from [Link]
- World Bank. (2021) Retrieved from [Link]
|