Contents |
Authors:
Stanislav Kotenko, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8684-0163 Sumy State University (Ukraine) Iryna Heiets, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1267-3790 RMIT University (Australia) Dina Yacout, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1691-0370 The Chartered Institute of Marketing (Egypt)
Pages: 175-187
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2021.3-15
Received: 10.03.2021
Accepted: 03.08.2021
Published: 13.09.2021
Download: |
Views: |
Downloads: |
|
|
|
Abstract
One of the basic economic laws that reflect the patterns of economic phenomena is the law of competition. According to it, in a market economy, those business entities with certain competitive advantages operate and develop successfully. Within the competitive market, organizations are forced to increase their competitiveness, forming certain competitive advantages in the appropriate space-time conditions. Globalization and integration trends make more stringent and complex requirements for various enterprises, leading to increased competition in national and international markets. The multifactorial dependence of organizational competitiveness makes it possible to form new ways to increase the level of this indicator. Endogenous and exogenous factors, in turn, create functional links between different sectors of the economy. This paper presents a bibliometric analysis of the concept of “Organizational competitiveness” using numerous software tools to identify links between factors of organizational competitiveness, its source, and antecedents. The methods used in the study include initial keyword search, data analysis and refinement, and clustering. Harzing’s Publish or Perish tool is used for initial investigation, BibExcel, VOSviewer, and MS Excel – for data analysis and refinement. The article uses data from the three most significant databases of scientific publications: Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus. Searching and comparing information taken from several sources allows for a comprehensive analysis of the literature and understanding of the principles of bibliometric maps of publications. In the framework of this study, the authors formed and analyzed cluster groups of concepts, the principles of their grouping, developed scientific approaches to clustering key terms in several databases. The relevance of this study lies in its impact on the process of forming conceptual clusters. With the help of the proposed scientific approaches, it is possible to explain the dependencies in the cluster distribution of individual definitions, their relationship with each other, the degree of belonging to a particular factor of organizational competitiveness.
Keywords: analysis, bibliometric, organizational competitiveness, factors, clustering, publications, visualization.
JEL Classification: C38, F12, F63, L51, R11.
Cite as: Kotenko, S., Heiets, I., & Yacout, D. (2021). Organizational competitiveness: a systematic literature review. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 175-187. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2021.3-15
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
- Ageron, B., Gunasekaran, A., Spalanzani, A., (2012). Sustainable supply management: An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 168-182, [CrossRef].
- Bai, C., Sarkis, J. (2013). A grey-based DEMATEL model for evaluating business process management critical success factors. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(1), 281-292. [CrossRef]
- Delios, A. (2010). How Can Organizations Be Competitive but Dare to Care?. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24, 25–36, [CrossRef]
- Fraj, E., Matute, J. and Melero, I. (2015). Environmental strategies and organizational competitiveness in the hotel industry: The role of learning and innovation as determinants of environmental success. Tourism Management, 46(C), 30-42. [CrossRef]
- Garrigós-Simón, F.J., Alcamí, R.L., & Ribera, T. (2012). Social networks and Web 3.0: their impact on the management and marketing of organizations. Management Decision, 50, 1880-1890. [CrossRef]
- Gunasekaran, A., Ngai E. (2012). The future of operations management: An outlook and analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 687-701, [CrossRef]
- Kabir, N., Carayannis, E. (2013). Big data, tacit knowledge and organizational competitiveness. Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning: ICICKM. [CrossRef]
- Kotenko, S., Kobushko, Ia., Heiets, I., & Rusanov, O. (2021a). КPI Model Impact on Employee Motivation and Competitiveness of Private Healthcare Facilities. Health Economics and Management Review, 2, 31-42. [CrossRef]
- Kotenko, S., Shvindina, H. (2018). Problems of assessing the competitiveness of enterprises as an indicator of strategic development. Problems of Economics, 3(37), 104-112. [Link]
- Kotenko, S., Shvindina, H. (2020). Reengineering of business processes as a direction of increasing the competitiveness of industrial enterprises. Visnyk of Sumy State University. Economics series. 2, 174−180. [CrossRef]
- Kotenko, S., Shvindina, H., & Heiets I. (2021b). The impact of migration on the competitiveness of the region and industry development. E3S Web of Conferences, 307, 02003 [CrossRef]
- Noruzi, M., & Vargas-Hérnandez, J. (2010). How Intellectual Capital and Learning Organization Can Foster Organizational Competitiveness. International Journal of Biometrics, 5, 183. DOI:[CrossRef]
- Shvindina, H. (2020) Economic Competitiveness: An Overview of Multilevel Concept. In: Leal Filho W., Azul A.M., Brandli L., özuyar PG, Wall T. (eds) Responsible Consumption and Production. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. [CrossRef]
- Subramanian, N., Gunasekaran, A. (2015). Cleaner supply-chain management practices for twenty-first-century organizational competitiveness: Practice-performance framework and research propositions. International Journal of Production Economics, 164(C), 216-233. [CrossRef]
- Van Eck, N. J. et al. (2010b). A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2405-2416 (2).
- Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L. (2010a). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538 (1).
- Wong, C., Kee-hung Lai & Cheng, T. (2011). Value of Information Integration to Supply Chain Management: Roles of Internal and External Contingencies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(3), 161-200 [CrossRef]
- Wu, C.-Y., Heiets, I., & Shvindina, H. (2020). Business Model Management of Low-Cost Carriers: in a Search for Impact-Factors of Performance (Case of AirAsia Group Airlines). Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 354-367. [CrossRef]
- Yazdani, M., Chatterjee, P., Zavadskas, E. K., & Zolfani, S. H. (2017). Integrated QFD-MCDM framework for green supplier selection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 3728–3740. [CrossRef]
|