Contents |
Authors:
Kristína Bečarova, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3072-7396 Mendel University in Brno (Czech Republic) Ľudmila Nagyova, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6068-6794 Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra (Slovak Republic) Naďa Hazuchova, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8368-8028 Mendel University in Brno (Czech Republic) Jana Stavkova, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5975-1958 Mendel University in Brno (Czech Republic)
Pages: 264-275
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2021.3-22
Received: 01.06.2021
Accepted: 29.08.2021
Published: 13.09.2021
Download: |
Views: |
Downloads: |
|
|
|
Abstract
This paper deals with the issue of food waste as a part of consumer behavior. Due to the absence of conceptual definitions and methodology for monitoring the quantity of food waste, the attention is focused on monitoring the factors that affect consumers purchasing the food and post-buying behavior with food. A survey focused on the subjective attitudes of consumers was carried out in two EU countries – the Netherlands and Slovakia. These countries are members of the EU and differ in their natural, cultural, and socio-economic influences. Based on the similarity of consumer behavior resulting from cluster analysis, the segments are defined to address them more effectively to reduce the amount of wasted food with negative consequences for the environment. Dutch consumers make small purchases as often as consumers from Slovakia. However, they differ in the frequency of purchases for more than 20 €. In the Netherlands, up to 46 % of respondents indicated that they do larger purchases one to two times. There is a neutral attitude to the importance of the price in both countries. Although the Slovaks buy less, they waste more food compared to the Dutch. Besides, they also mention inappropriate storage as a reason. The respondents’ attitudes to food waste were divided by similarities into 5 segments in Slovakia and 5 – in the Netherlands. In Slovakia, the above segments involved young women-wasters, consumers, partial self-suppliers, uninterested loner women, gentle and responsible people with an active approach in the area of waste. In the Netherlands, there are other segments of people such as food-friendly housewives, younger women-wasters, families with children with a neutral attitude to waste, students from big cities, young working uninterested loners. The findings showed factors affecting consumer wasting are country-specific. Thus, it is initial to understand the differences in consumer behavior to set appropriate policies to reduce food waste.
Keywords: consumption behavior, causes of waste, consumer behavior factors, segmentation
JEL Classification: G32, P34.
Cite as: Michalkova, L., Stehel, V., Nica, E., & Durana, P. (2021). Consumer Approach to the Food Waste in Selected EU Countries. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 264-275. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2021.3-22
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
- Akhtar, P. (2019). Drivers of Green Supply Chain Initiatives and their Impact on Economic Performance of Firms: Evidence from Pakistan’s Manufacturing Sector. Journal of Competitiveness, 11(2), 5–18. [CrossRef]
- Aramyan, L., & Valeva, N. (2016). The Netherlands – Country Report on NationalFoodWastePolicy. Retrieved from [Link]
- Bandara, W. W. M. C. (2014). Consumer decision-making styles and local brand biasness: Exploration in the Czech Republic. Journal of Competitiveness, 6(1), 3-17. [CrossRef]
- Blichfeldt, B. S., Mikkelsen, M. & Gram, M. (2015). When it Stops Being Food: The Edibility, Ideology, Procrastination, Objectification and Internalization of Household Food Waste. Food, Culture& Society: International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 18(1), 89-105. [CrossRef]
- Bonaccorsi, G. (2015). Food and human behaviour: consumption, waste and sustainability. Journal of public health research, 4(2). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borma, A. (2017). Food waste–a global problem. SEA–Practical Application of Science, (15), 353-362. [Google Scholar]
- Dou, Z., Ferguson, J. D., Galligan, D. T., Kelly, A. M., Finn, S. M., & Giegengack, R. (2016). Assessing US food wastage and opportunities for reduction. Global Food Security, 8, 19-26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission. (2010). EuropeanWasteClassificationforStatistics (EWC-Stat) Version 4(2010).Retrieved from [Link]
- European Court of Auditors. (2016). CombatingFoodWaste: anopportunityforthe EU to improvetheresource-efficiencyofthefoodsupplychain. Special Report. Retrieved from [Link]
- EUROSTAT. (2015). Food waste data set for EU-28 New Estimates and EnvironmentalImpact. Retrieved from [Link]
- EUROSTAT. (2019a). Glossary: Classificationofindividualconsumption by purpose (COICOP). Retrieved from [Link]
- EUROSTAT. (2019b). Generation of waste by wastecategory, hazard ousness and NACERev. 2 activity. Retrieved from [Link]
- FAO. (2014). Technical Platform on the Measurement and Reduction of Food Loss and Waste. Retrieved from [Link]
- FAO. (2017). Technical Platform on the Measurement and Reduction of Food Loss and Waste: Food Waste. Retrieved from [Link]
- Fogarassy, C., Nguyen, H. H., Olah, J., & Popp, J. (2018). Transition management applications to accelerate sustainable food consumption – comparative analysis between Switzerland and Hungary. Journal of International Studies, 11(3), 31-43. [Google Scholar]
- Government Office of the Slovak Republic. (2016). Partnership Agreement of the SR for the years 2014-2020. Retrieved from [Link]
- Kardes, F. R., Cronley, M. L. ,&Cline, T. W. (2015). Consumer behavior. 2nd edition. Stamford, CT, USA: CengageLearning. [Link]
- Khan Ajaz, K., Çera, G., & Nétek, V. (2019). Perception of the Selected Business Environment Aspects by Service Firms. Journal of Tourism and Services, 10(19), 111-127. [CrossRef]
- Kinderis, R. (2019). Identification of Business Model Complementarity and the Factors that Determine it in the Klaipeda City Incoming Tourism. Journal of Tourism and Services, 10(19): 93-110. [CrossRef]
- OECD. (2017). Makingthe Slovak Republic a more resourceefficienteconomy country study OECD environment policy paper no. 7. Retrieved from [Link]
- Office of the government of the SR. (2016). Operačný program potravinovej a zakladnejmaterialnejpomoci: Retrieved from [Link]
- Parfitt, J., Barthel, M. & Macnaughton, S. (2010). Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050. [CrossRef]
- Parizeau, K., von Massow, M. & Martin, R. (2015). Household-level dynamics of food waste production and related beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours in Guelph, Ontario. Wastemanagement, 35, 207-217. [CrossRef]
- Parry, A. P. (2015). Preventing Food Waste: Case Studies of Japan and the United Kingdom. Paris: OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parry, A., James, K., & LeRoux, S. (2015). Strategies to achieve economic and environmental gains by reducing food waste. Retrieved from [Link]
- Persson, K. (2019). Confident millennials: Differences in consumer confidence across five generations. Economics & Sociology, 12(4), 257-333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pieters, J. (2019). Netherlands throws away 5 million kilos of food every day: Report 2019. Retrieved from [Link]
- Polovka, M,. & Nouzovska, Z. (2017). Trendy v potravinarstve. [Link]
- Popp, J., Balogh, P., Olah, J., Kot, S., Harangi Rakos, M., & Lengyel, P. (2018). Social network analysis of scientific articles published by food policy. Sustainability, 10(3), 577. [Google Scholar] [Google Scholar]
- Priefer, C., Jörissen, J., & Bräutigam K. R. (2013). Technology options for feeding 10 billion people options for cutting food waste. Report prepared for STOA, the European Parliament Science and Technology Options Assessment Panel. InstituteforTechnologyAssessment and SystemsAnalysis (ITAS), KarlsruheInstituteofTechnology (KIT). Retrieved from [Link]
- Priefer, C., Jörissen, J., & Bräutigam, K. R. (2016). Food waste prevention in Europe–A cause-driven approach to identify the most relevant leverage points for action. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 109, 155-165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, D., & Roe, B. E. (2016). Household food waste: Multivariate regression and principal components analyses of awareness and attitudes among US consumers. PloS one, 11(7), e0159250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quested, T., & Johnson, H. (2009). Household food and drink waste in the UK: A report containing quantification of the amount and types of household food and drink waste in the UK. Report Prepared by WRAP (Waste and Resources Action Programme), Banbury. [Google Scholar]
- Selzer, M., Glanz, R., & Schneider, F. (2009). Causes of food waste generation in households. na. [Google Scholar]
- Statistical office of the Slovak Republic. (2019). STATdat. Retrieved from [Link].
- Tucker, C. A., & Farrelly, T. (2016). Household food waste: the implications of consumer choice in food from purchase to disposal. Local Environment, 21(6), 682-706. [CrossRef]
- Usunier, J. C. (1998). International and cross-cultural management research. Sage. [Google Scholar]
- Van Dooren, C., Östergren, A., & Mensink, F. (2018). Consumer foodwaste: Factsheet.
- Visschers, V., Wickli, N,. & Siegrist, M. (2016). Sorting out food waste behaviour: A survey on the motivators and barriers of self-reportedamounts of food waste in households. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 66-78. [CrossRef]
- Waarts, Y., Eppink, M., Oosterkamp, E., Hiller, S., van der Sluis, A., & Timmermans, T. (2011). Reducing food waste: Obstacles experienced in legislation and regulations, Wageningen: WUR, LEI Report 2011-059. [Google Scholar]
- Waste360 Staff. (2018). The Netherlands Announces National Program to Reduce Food Waste. Retrieved from [Link]
- Wrap, W. (2009). Household food and drink waste in the UK. Report Prepared by WRAP [Link]
|