Contents |
Authors:
Svitlana Kolosok, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5133-9878 Ph.D., Sumy State University, Ukraine Liudmyla Saher, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5628-5477 Ph.D., Sumy State University, Ukraine Yevhen Kovalenko, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2111-9372 Ph.D., Sumy State University, Ukraine Milica Delibasic, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1036-3836 Ph.D., Mediterranean University, University of Montenegro, Montenegro
Pages: 151-160
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2022.2-14
Received: 15.01.2022
Accepted: 22.06.2022
Published: 30.06.2022
Download: |
Views: |
Downloads: |
|
|
|
Abstract
Accelerating the development of new energy infrastructure in the EU based on renewable energy sources is necessary for the targeted reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and increase in energy production from renewable sources. This article reviews current renewable energy development issues and research on energy innovations within the European energy policy. The effectiveness of energy generation from renewable resources and adaptation of energy innovations may be limited to the challenges of ensuring the flexibility of the pan-European energy system, as the development of energy storage systems and technologies to respond to demand is much slower than the development of renewable energy. Therefore, the study’s primary purpose was to explain by mathematical modelling the determinism of variation in electricity production in the EU27 due to predictors of net electricity generation from certain types of renewable resources for 2017-2020. To identify the effects of the deployment of renewable energy in the EU27, a regression model of Markov switching for three regimes was chosen, consisting of selected predictors of clean energy generation from renewable sources (hydro, geothermal, wind, and solar). The statsmodels v0.13.2 toolkit in Python 3.10.5 was used to conduct this study. The variation between total electricity production and net electricity generation in the EU27 is not constant and depends on the mode of electricity production. That is, there is an asymmetry in the relationship between these parameters. The results also show that when the electricity generation rate in the EU27 is moderate, the net wind energy generation rate is not significant. Furthermore, the negative link between clean solar energy generation and electricity production in the EU is significant for all three regimes.
Keywords: european energy policy, sustainable development goals, green innovations, the efficiency of energy policy
JEL Classification: O30, Q41, Q42.
Cite as: Kolosok, S., Saher, L., Kovalenko, Y., & Delibasic, M. (2022). Renewable Energy and Energy Innovations: Examining Relationships Using Markov Switching Regression Model. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 151-160. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2022.2-14
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
- Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2010). Renewable energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of OECD countries. Energy Policy, 38(1), 656-660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2012). Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption-growth nexus: Evidence from a panel error correction model. Energy Economics, 34(3), 733-738. [google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayodele, O. J., Innocent, I. O., & Garba, S. J. (2019). Innovation as a Mediating of Relationship Between Internal and External Environment in Agribusiness Performance. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 196-207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Shahbaz, M., Roubaud, D., & Farhani, S. (2018). How do economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions?. Energy policy, 113, 356-367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhowmik, D. (2019). Decoupling CO2 Emissions in Nordic countries: Panel Data Analysis. SocioEconomic Challenges, 3(2), 15-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Innovative Strategies For Social-Economic Development Financial Strategies In The Development Country. SocioEconomic Challenges, 5(1), 44-65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delucchi, M. A., & Jacobson, M. Z. (2011). Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, part II: Reliability, system and transmission costs, and policies. Energy Policy, 39(3), 1170-1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demirbas, A. (2007). Importance of biodiesel as transportation fuel. Energy Policy, 35(9), 4661-4670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demirbas, A. (2009). Political, economic and environmental impacts of biofuels: A review. Applied Energy, 86(SUPPL. 1), S108-S117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Didenko, I., & Sidelnyk, N. (2021). Insurance Innovations as a Part of the Financial Inclusion. Business Ethics and Leadership, 5(1), 127-135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dogan, E., & Seker, F. (2016). Determinants of CO2 emissions in the European Union: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renewable Energy, 94, 429-439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernando Alonso Ojeda, C. (2021). Cybersecurity, An Axis On Which Management Innovation Must Turn In The 21st Century. [Google Scholar]
- El Amri, A., Boutti, R., Oulfarsi, S., Rodhain, F., & Bouzahir, B. (2020). Carbon financial markets underlying climate risk management, pricing and forecasting: Fundamental analysis. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 4(4), 31-44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eurostat (2021). Electrical capacity for wind and solar photovoltaic power – statistics. Retrieved from [Link]
- Eurostat (2022a). Energy – monthly data [ei_isen_m]. Retrieved from [Link]
- Eurostat (2022b). Net electricity generation by type of fuel – monthly data [nrg_cb_pem]. Retrieved from [Link]
- Gielen, D., Boshell, F., Saygin, D., Bazilian, M. D., Wagner, N., & Gorini, R. (2019). The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strategy Reviews, 24, 38-50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldfeld, S.M. & R.E. Quandt (1973). A Markov model for switching regressions, Journal of Econometrics, 1, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haas, W., Krausmann, F., Wiedenhofer, D., & Heinz, M. (2015). How circular is the global economy?: An assessment of material flows, waste production, and recycling in the European Union and the world in 2005. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19(5), 765-777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamilton, J. D. (1989). A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary timeseries and the business cycle, Econometrica, 57, 357–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horbach, J., Rammer, C., & Rennings, K. (2012). Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact – the role of regulatory push/pull, technology push, and market pull. Ecological Economics, 78, 112-122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IEA (2020). European Union 2020. IEA, Paris. Retrieved from [Link]
- Jacobsson, S., & Bergek, A. (2004). Transforming the energy sector: The evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(5), 815-849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacobsson, S., & Lauber, V. (2006). The politics and policy of energy system transformation – explaining the german diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy, 34(3), 256-276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnstone, N., HaSčič, I., & Popp, D. (2010). Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: Evidence based on patent counts. Environmental and Resource Economics, 45(1), 133-155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolosok, S., Bilan, Y., Vasylieva, T., Wojciechowski, A., & Morawski, M. (2021). A scoping review of renewable energy, sustainability and the environment. Energies, 14(15). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwilinski, A., Lyulyov, O., Dzwigol, H., Vakulenko, I., & Pimonenko, T. (2022). Integrative smart grids’ assessment system. Energies, 15(2). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ley, M., Stucki, T., & Woerter, M. (2016). The Impact of Energy Prices on Green Innovation. The Energy Journal, 37(1), 41–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyeonov, S; Bilan, Y., Rubanov, P., Dovaliene, A., & Marjanski, A. (2020). Correlation Links of Innovations in Financial Services and Business Environment Development. 35th International-Business-Information-Management-Association Conference (IBIMA). 8498–8513.
- Lyulyov, O., Vakulenko, I., Pimonenko, T., Kwilinski, A., Dzwigol, H., & Dzwigol-Barosz, M. (2021). Comprehensive assessment of smart grids: Is there a universal approach? Energies, 14(12). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maneejuk, P., Thongkairat, S., & Srichaikul, W. (2021). Time-varying co-movement analysis between COVID-19 shocks and the energy markets using the Markov Switching Dynamic Copula approach. Energy Reports, 7, 81-88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Markewitz, P., Kuckshinrichs, W., Leitner, W., Linssen, J., Zapp, P., Bongartz, R., … & Muller, T. E. (2012). Worldwide innovations in the development of carbon capture technologies and the utilization of CO 2. Energy & environmental science, 5(6), 7281-7305. [Google Scholar]
- Menegaki, A. N. (2011). Growth and renewable energy in Europe: A random effect model with evidence for neutrality hypothesis. Energy Economics, 33(2), 257-263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moutinho, V., Oliveira, H., & Mota, J. (2022). Examining the long term relationships between energy commodities prices and carbon prices on electricity prices using Markov Switching Regression. Energy Reports, 8, 589-594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Newell, R. G., Jaffe, A. B., & Stavins, R. N. (1999). The induced innovation hypothesis and energy-saving technological change. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 941-975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ojeda, F.A. (2021). Origin, Use and Meaning of the Innovation Diamond. Business Ethics and Leadership, 5(4), 48-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavlyk, V. (2020a). Assessment of green investment impact on the energy efficiency gap of the national economy. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 4(1), 117-123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavlyk, V. (2020b). Institutional Determinants Of Assessing Energy Efficiency Gaps In The National Economy. SocioEconomic Challenges, 4(1), 122-128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samoilikova, A. (2020). Financial Policy of Innovation Development Providing: The Impact Formalization. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 4(2), 5-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schiebahn, S., Grube, T., Robinius, M., Tietze, V., Kumar, B., & Stolten, D. (2015). Power to gas: Technological overview, systems analysis and economic assessment for a case study in germany. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 40(12), 4285-4294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suri, M., Huld, T. A., Dunlop, E. D., & Ossenbrink, H. A. (2007). Potential of solar electricity generation in the european union member states and candidate countries. Solar Energy, 81(10), 1295-1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Syhyda, L., and Bondarenko, A. (2020). Innovations and Industry 4.0: A Bibliometric Analysis. Business Inform 6:40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teletov, A., Letunovska, N., & Lazorenko, V. (2020). Innovations in Online Advertising Management of Ukrainian Business Entities. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering. 9. 272-279. [Google Scholar]
- Temkeng, S. D., & Fofack, A. D. (2021). A Markov-switching dynamic regression analysis of the asymmetries related to the determinants of US crude oil production between 1982 and 2019. Petroleum Science, 18(2), 679-686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tutar, H., Karademir, O., Guler, S. & Tutar, S. (2019). Management of Innovations in Education: Students Satisfaction and Career Adoptability. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 321-335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vakulenko, I., & Myroshnychenko, I. (2015). Approaches to the organization of the energy efficient activity at the regional level in the context of limited budget resources during the transformation of energy market paradigm. Environmental and Climate Technologies, 15(1), 59-76. [Google Scholar]
- Virchenko, V., Petrunia, Yu., Osetskyi, V., Makarenko, M., & Sheludko, V. (2021). Commercialization of Intellectual Property: Innovative Impact on Global Competitiveness of National Economies. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 25-39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vorontsova, A. S., Lieonov, S. V., Vasylieva, T. A., & Artiukhov, A. Y. (2018). Innovations in the financing of lifelong learning system: expenditure optimization model. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 218-231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wustenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., & Burer, M. J. (2007). Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2683-2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zakharkin, O. O., Basantsov, I. V., Myroshnychenko, I. O., & Shcherbachenko, V. O. (2019). Analysis of the innovative development directions for industrial enterprises. Espacios, 40(27). [Google Scholar]
- Zakharkin, O., & Zakharkina, L. (2014). Enterprise’s innovation development strategy substantiation and its AIMS. Economic Annals-XXI, 7-8, 76-79. [Google Scholar]
|