Contents |
Authors:
Tsotne Zhghenti, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6779-172X Ph.D., Associate Professor, Business and Technology University, Georgia Giorgi Gedenidze, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1076-2266 Business and Technology University, Georgia
Pages: 209-219
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2022.2-19
Received: 25.04.2022
Accepted: 22.06.2022
Published: 30.06.2022
Download: |
Views: |
Downloads: |
|
|
|
Abstract
The presented paper discusses the complex processes and challenges of the modern world, which are directly related to the development of sharing economy business models in digital platforms. It also explains the main features of the concept and describes the peer-to-peer effects globally and in the context of local cases in Georgia. Georgia is a developing country where the digital trust-forming process has started within the last few years. The COVID-19 pandemic has influenced digital business by increasing transactions over the Internet, which creates enormous opportunities for platforms from the sharing economy. The paper focuses on two areas: the problems of involvement in the sharing economy and the obstacles that directly or indirectly hinder the entities participating in the sharing economy. The research concentrates on consumer experiences and the prospects for developing the current model of the economy even more in future. The combination of consumer values is a dilemma that needs exploration to ensure the successful functioning of sharing economy services. Therefore, research outcomes fill the literature gap related to consumer behaviour on the local sharing economy digital platforms. In order to better understand consumer behavioural characteristics, this study examines motivational factors (technical, customer, trust-based) that individually influence satisfaction and the intention to use a platform in a peer-to-peer (P2P) accommodation again. Based on relevant literature and an online survey of 259 questionnaire respondents, who actively use sharing services locally in Georgia, this study confirms that technical prepositions, consumer values attributes and platform trust-based characteristics are positively associated with customer satisfaction and loyalty. Furthermore, the analysis revealed that satisfaction positively correlates with future intentions mediated simultaneously by the above-mentioned factors. The research findings can be developed in future academic research to study the digital trust-building process and analyse the complex nature of the sharing economy markets.
Keywords: digital economy; digital trust; digital platforms; sharing economy; trust distribution
JEL Classification: D80, O30, O17.
Cite as: Zhghenti, T., & Gedenidze, G. (2022). Sharing Economy Platforms in Georgia: Digital Trust, Loyalty and Satisfaction. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 209-219. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2022.2-19
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
- Akhmedova, A., Marimon, F., & Mas-Machuca, M. (2020). Winning strategies for customer loyalty in the sharing economy: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Business Research, 112, 33-44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andreotti, A., Anselmi, G., Eichhorn, T., Hoffmann, C. P., & Micheli, M. (2017). Participation in the Sharing Economy: Report from the EU H2020 Research Project Ps2Share: Participation, Privacy, and Power in the Sharing Economy. [Google Scholar]
- Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of consumer research, 39(4), 881-898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of business research, 67(8), 1595-1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). What’s mine is yours. The rise of collaborative consumption. [Google Scholar]
- Dugan, P. (2016). The Sharing (aka Gig) Economy. Economic Issues, Problems and Perspectives. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Retrieved from [Link]
- Ert, E., Fleischer, A., & Magen, N. (2016). Trust and reputation in the sharing economy: The role of personal photos in Airbnb. Tourism management, 55, 62-73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ganapati, S., & Reddick, C. G. (2018). Prospects and challenges of sharing economy for the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 35(1), 77-87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2016). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the association for information science and technology, 67(9), 2047-2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y., & Lau, A. K. (2021). Roles of consumer trust and risks on continuance intention in the sharing economy: An empirical investigation. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 47, 101050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kikilashvili, M. (2021). Georgia: Reality and Future Perspectives of the Sharing Economy Development. Gabriela Avram, eds, 2021, 128-138. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, M. K., & Turban, E. (2001). A trust model for consumer internet shopping. International Journal of electronic commerce, 6(1), 75-91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marimon, F., Llach, J., Alonso-Almeida, M., & Mas-Machuca, M. (2019). CC-Qual: A holistic scale to assess customer perceptions of service quality of collaborative consumption services. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 130-141. [Google Scholar]
- Mazzella, F., Sundararajan, A., d’Espous, V. B., & Möhlmann, M. (2016). How digital trust powers the sharing economy. IESE Business Review, 26(5), 24-31. [Google Scholar]
- Nadeem, W., & Al-Imamy, S. (2020). Do ethics drive value co-creation on digital sharing economy platforms?. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavlou, P. A., Tan, Y. H., & Gefen, D. (2003). Institutional trust and familiarity in online interorganizational relationships. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) Naples, Italy. [Google Scholar]
- Richter, C., Kraus, S., Brem, A., Durst, S., & Giselbrecht, C. (2017). Digital entrepreneurship: Innovative business models for the sharing economy. Creativity and innovation management, 26(3), 300-310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schröder, M. K., & Theilen, A. T. (2019). Sharing Economy Services–Analysis of Customers’ Motives and Concerns. [Google Scholar]
- Sundararajan, A. (2013). From Zipcar to the sharing economy. Harvard business review, 1(1), 1-2. [Google Scholar]
- Sutherland, W., & Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 328-341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ter Huurne, M. (2019). A Leap into Faith: Determinants of Trust in the Sharing Economy (Doctoral dissertation, University Utrecht). [Google Scholar]
- Tussyadiah, I. P. (2016). Factors of satisfaction and intention to use peer-to-peer accommodation. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 55, 70-80. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, S. B., Lee, K., Lee, H., & Koo, C. (2019). In Airbnb we trust: Understanding consumers’ trust-attachment building mechanisms in the sharing economy. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 83, 198-209. [Google Scholar]
- Zervas, G., Proserpio, D., & Byers, J. W. (2017). The rise of the sharing economy: Estimating the impact of Airbnb on the hotel industry. Journal of marketing research, 54(5), 687-705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, T. C., Gu, H., & Jahromi, M. F. (2019). What makes the sharing economy successful? An empirical examination of competitive customer value propositions. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 275-283. [Google Scholar]
- Zhghenti, T., & Chkareuli, V. (2021). Enhancing Online Business Sector: Digital Trust Formation Process. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 87-93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, X., & Liu, K. (2021). A systematic review and future directions of the sharing economy: business models, operational insights and environment-based utilities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290, 125209. [Google Scholar]
|