Contents |
Authors:
Ririn Wulandari, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0596-8822 Assistant Profesor, Dr. SE, MM, Universitas Mercu Buana, Indonesia Wei-Loon Koe, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3977-1884 Associate Professor, Ph.D., Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia
Pages: 120-135
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2022.4-12
Received: 13.10.2022
Accepted: 17.12.2022
Published: 30.12.2022
Download: |
Views: |
Downloads: |
|
|
|
Abstract
Innovation drives change, and conversely, innovation occurs because of change. Initially, innovation was only oriented toward technology in discovering new products. Only large companies could do it since it requires a challenging process. All levels, including MSMEs, could carry out further developments and innovation because innovation is not only about technological innovations. Based on this, the research objectives are to analyze the influence of the MSME owner’s characteristics on the intention of marketing and technological innovation through attitude and motivation in Indonesia. SEM analysis with the Smart-PLS program was used to answer the research objectives. The population in this study is the Indonesian micro, small, and medium enterprises from various types of businesses. Samples are 128 respondents to meet Hair theory. The minimum threshold for processing by the Smart PLS program is 100. Judgment sampling is defined as the sampling technique. The results of this study are attitude and motivation affect innovation intentions, both directly and as intervening variables that encourage curiosity, optimism, and risk-taking. Opinion leadership, social status, attitudes, and motivation influence the intention of marketing innovation, whereas awareness, financial stability, optimism, risk-taking, attitudes, and motivation directly affect the intention of technological innovation. The findings of this study are useful for the government and social organizations as a companion for MSMEs to massively increase intention in innovation for MSMEs by creating activities that foster attitudes and motivation to innovate. With the massive formation of attitudes and motivation to innovate, several characteristics possessed by MSME owners are encouraged to strengthen, thus giving rise to the intention to innovate. The innovations carried out by MSMEs on a massive scale can improve their performance and become a solution to the downturn. These characteristics, attitudes, and motivations are the novelty of this research, which are the factors influencing the intention to innovate, both marketing and technological innovation.
Keywords: innovation theory, entrepreneurship, policy strategy, attitude, motivation, characteristics.
JEL Classification: M20, M21, M29.
Cite as: Wulandari, R. & Koe, W. L (2022). The Factors that Influence the Intention of Marketing and Technological Innovation in MSMEs Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 120-135. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2022.4-12
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
- Ahn, J. M., Minshall, T., & Mortara, L. (2017). Understanding the human side of openness: the fit between open innovation modes and CEO characteristics. R&D Management, 47(5), 727-740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. (2005). EBOOK: Attitudes, Personality and Behaviour. McGraw-hill education (UK). [Google Scholar]
- Altunbasak, Y. (2016). Excellence in innovation and knowledge economy. In Becoming a World-Class University (pp. 117-143). Springer, Cham. [Google Scholar]
- Amoroso, S. (2017). Multilevel heterogeneity of R&D cooperation and innovation determinants. Eurasian Business Review, 7(1), 93-120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asim, Z., & Sorooshian, S. (2019). Exploring the role of knowledge, innovation and technology management (KNIT) capabilities that influence research and development. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(2), 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernatchez, A. C., Gauvin, L., Fuller, D., Dubé, A. S., & Drouin, L. (2015). Knowing about a public bicycle share program in Montreal, Canada: are diffusion of innovation and proximity enough for equitable awareness?. Journal of Transport & Health, 2(3), 360-368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Celik, P., Storme, M., Davila, A., & Myszkowski, N. (2016). Work-related curiosity positively predicts worker innovation. Journal of Management Development. 35(9), 1184-1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, N., Kim, D., Goo, J., & Whitmore, A. (2008). Knowing is doing: An empirical validation of the relationship between managerial information security awareness and action. Information Management & Computer Security. 16(5), 484-501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciasullo, M. V., Tommasetti, R., Trosi, O., & Vesci, M. (2019). Curiosity as Brazilian tourist motivation in visiting Europe. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo, 13 (3), 140-160. [Google Scholar]
- Ciborowski, R. (2016). Innovation systems in the terms of schumpeterian crea-tive destruction. EUREKA: Social and Humanities, (4), 29-37. [Google Scholar]
- Dearing, J. W., & Cox, J. G. (2018). Diffusion of innovations theory, principles, and practice. Health affairs, 37(2), 183-190. [Google Scholar]
- Diaconu, M. (2011). Technological Innovation: Concept, Process, Typology and Implications in the Economy. Theoretical & Applied Economics, 18(10). [Google Scholar]
- Encabo, J. V. (2016). The Concept of Knowledge: What is It For? Disputatio, 8(43), 187-202. [Google Scholar]
- Fishman, J., Yang, C., & Mandell, D. (2021). Attitude theory and measurement in implementation science: a secondary review of empirical studies and opportunities for advancement. Implementation Science, 16(1), 1-10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geum, Y. P., Kim, P., & Jang, Y. H. (2020). The Effect of Entrepreneur’s Curiosity on Challenge, Innovation and Competition. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 15(2), 253-265. [Google Scholar]
- Goorha, P., & Potts, J. (2016). Awareness in innovators: from ‘outside the box’to ‘inside the bubble’. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 6(1), 1-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gribanova, S., Rizhamadze, K., & Ābeltiņa, A. (2020). The Role of Motivation Among IT professionals To Foster Innovation: SMEs Focus. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 5(5). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gross, M. E., Zedelius, C. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2020). Cultivating an understanding of curiosity as a seed for creativity. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 35, 77-82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, S., Malhotra, N. K., Czinkota, M., & Foroudi, P. (2016). Marketing innovation: A consequence of competitiveness. Journal of business research, 69(12), 5671-5681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halbesleben, J. R., Novicevic, M. M., Harvey, M. G., & Buckley, M. R. (2003). Awareness of temporal complexity in leadership of creativity and innovation: A competency-based model. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4-5), 433-454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haque, M. F., Haque, M. A., & Islam, M. S. (2014). Motivational Theories-A Critical Analysis. ASA University Review, 8 (1), 61–68. [Google Scholar]
- Harada, T. (2020). The effects of risk-taking, exploitation, and exploration on creativity. PloS one, 15(7), e0235698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hongbo, L., & Koffi, A. L. (2019). Effect of Innovation on Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Performance and Competitiveness: Evidence from Cote d’Ivoire. Available at SSRN 3493412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Q., Chen, X., Zhou, M., Zhang, X., & Duan, L. (2019). How does CEO’s environmental awareness affect technological innovation?. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(2), 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibarra, D., Bigdeli, A. Z., Igartua, J. I., & Ganzarain, J. (2020). Business model innovation in established SMEs: A configurational approach. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(3), 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, M. P. (2015). Sustainability management and small and medium‐sized enterprises: Managers’ awareness and implementation of innovative tools. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(5), 271-285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koudelková, P., & Milichovský, F. (2015). Successful innovation by motivation. Business: Theory and Practice, 16(3), 223-230. [Google Scholar]
- LaMorte, W. W. (2019). Diffusion of Innovation Theory. Behavioral Change Management. Retrieved from[Link]
- Larsen, G. D. (2011). Understanding the early stages of the innovation diffusion process: awareness, influence and communication networks. Construction Management and Economics, 29(10), 987-1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lemanowicz, M. (2015). Innovation in economic theory and the development of economic thought. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Oeconomia, 14(4). [Google Scholar]
- Machmud, S. (2017). The Effect of Motivational Entrepreneurship on Business Performance of SMEs Moderated by Process Innovation. Archives of Business Research, 5(8). [Google Scholar]
- Mai, Y., Zhang, W., & Wang, L. (2019). The effects of entrepreneurs’ moral awareness and ethical behavior on product innovation of new ventures: Evidence from China. Chinese Management Studies, 13(2), 421-446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malandrino, D., Scarano, V., & Spinelli, R. (2013, September). How increased awareness can impact attitudes and behaviors toward online privacy protection. In 2013 International Conference on Social Computing (pp. 57-62). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansfeld, M. N., Hölzle, K., & Gemunden, H. G. (2010). Personal characteristics of innovators—an empirical study of roles in innovation management. International Journal of Innovation Management, 14(06), 1129-1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Medrano, N., & Olarte-Pascual, C. (2016). The effects of the crisis on marketing innovation: an application for Spain. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 31(3), 404-417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohajan, H. K. (2016). Knowledge is an essential element at present world. International Journal of Publication and Social Studies, 1(1), 31-53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreira, J., Silva, M. J., Simões, J., & Sousa, G. (2012). Drivers of marketing innovation in Portuguese firms. Amfiteatru Economic Journal, 14(31), 195-206. [Google Scholar]
- Muller, J. M. (2019). Business model innovation in small-and medium-sized enterprises. Technology Management, 30(8), 1127-1142. [Google Scholar]
- Naidoo, V. (2010). Firm survival through a crisis: The influence of market orientation, marketing innovation and business strategy. Industrial marketing management, 39(8), 1311-1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nieves, J., & Diaz-Meneses, G. (2016). Antecedents and outcomes of marketing innovation: an empirical analysis in the hotel industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(8), 1554-1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozusaglam, S. (2012). Environmental innovation: a concise review of the literature. l’entreprise, 2-3, 15-38.
- Paulikas, J. (2018). The factors determining employees’ positive attitude to innovations: a case of Klaipėda public transport companies. Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai, (79), 85-102. [Google Scholar]
- Peljko, Ž., Jeraj, M., Săvoiu, G., & Marič, M. (2016). An empirical study of the relationship between entrepreneurial curiosity and innovativeness. Organizacija, 49(3). [Google Scholar]
- Phillips, R. (2014). Space for curiosity. Progress in Human Geography, 38(4), 493-512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raghupathi, V., & Raghupathi, W. (2017). Innovation at country-level: association between economic development and patents. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 6(1), 1-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sağ, S., Sezen, B., & Guzel, M. (2016). Factors that motivate or prevent adoption of open innovation by SMEs in developing countries and policy suggestions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 756-763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saha, A. K., Muhammad, N., & Jafrin, T. (2017). Risk Taking Behavior in Relation to Motivation and Job Satisfaction of Professionals. Business Review, 8, 53-76. [Google Scholar]
- Setiadi, N. J., Ali, A. J., & Aafaqi, R. (2007). The impact of personal characteristics and intrinsic motivation on creative behavior among Indonesian radio station managers. The South East Asian Journal of Management, 1(1), 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suharti, L., Soegiono, L., & Purwati, Y. (2013). Technology Innovation Adoption Model among SME Tempe Producer (A Study on Tempe Produces in Jawa Tengah, Indonesia). International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 3(2), 5-14. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, S. P. (2017). What is innovation? A study of the definitions, academic models and applicability of innovation to an example of social housing in England. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5(11), 128-146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ungerman, O., Dedkova, J., & Gurinova, K. (2018). The impact of marketing innovation on the competitiveness of enterprises in the context of industry 4.0. Journal of competitiveness, 10(2), 132. [Google Scholar]
- Usai, A., Scuotto, V., Murray, A., Fiano, F., & Dezi, L. (2018). Do entrepreneurial knowledge and innovative attitude overcome “imperfections” in the innovation process? Insights from SMEs in the UK and Italy. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(8), 1637-1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van de Vrande, V., De Jong, J. P., Vanhaverbeke, W., & De Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6-7), 423-437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiktorsson, M., & Groth, M. (2011). Conditions for Innovation: Insights from a multi-case study. Journal of technology management & innovation, 6(2), 203-217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ying, J. J., & Sovacool, B. K. (2021). A fair trade? Expert perceptions of equity, innovation, and public awareness in China’s future Emissions Trading Scheme. Climatic Change, 164(3), 1-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, X., & Xie, X. (2015). Effects of knowledge on attitude formation and change toward genetically modified foods. Risk Analysis, 35(5), 790-810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zilicus. (2021). Success of Innovation & Role of Early Adopters. Retrieved from [Link].
|