Abstract

In the current turbulent and constantly changing conditions, there is a growing tendency to develop human resource activities through implementing managerial innovations. The present paper addresses social workers’ work motivation. The paper’s main goal is to determine the impact of work motivation on social service employees, representatives of generation X and generation Y. The present paper analyses generation X’s and generation Y’s work preferences accounting for the distinctiveness of social service work performance. An original questionnaire was distributed to the social workers. For the selection of respondents in social services facilities, the method of a random selection of respondents was used. In this method, each respondent has the same probability of being chosen. The research sample consisted of 201 employees of social services. The questionnaire tackled two areas: demographics (gender, age, and educational background) and work motivation (work environment, working atmosphere, career opportunities, upskilling, income, and demotivating agents at the workplace). The obtained data were statistically processed and evaluated. The data were analysed regarding correlations, differences, and similarities in the social workers’ perception of work motivation. The research shows no statistically significant relationship between generation X and generation Y regarding the main motivational stimulus in social workers. Both generations perceive motivation in the same way. Another outcome of the research is that Generation X respondents consider «financial remuneration» and «upskilling» more important than Generation Y respondents. Generation Y respondents consider «career growth», «work being interesting», «friendly work environment», «feedback», and «work-life balance» more important than Generation X respondents. Research respondents appreciate the scope for internal reflection and strengthening of internal motivation. External and internal motivational stimuli, as well as other motivational benefits, support improving the quality of social services and overall improving the quality of life of social services employees. The presented research brings findings applicable to the social service sector in the framework of managerial innovation and the scope of employees’ work motivation.

Keywords: human resources management, social services, work motivation, generation X, generation Y.

JEL Classification: M12, I30, J50.

Cite as: Gallo, P., Mihalcova, B., & Balogova, B (2023). Work Motivation of Social Workers in the Context of Management Innovations Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 55-63. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2023.1-05

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Baum, T. (2020). A changing world of work. What can we learn from the service sector about employing Millennials (and Gen Z)? Organizational Dynamics, 49(3), 100715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
2. Bila, M., Kacmarova, A., & Vaňkova, I. (2015). Adopting cross-disciplinary perspectives in constructing a multilingual’s identity. Human Affairs, 25(4), 430-442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
3. Borgkvist, A., Moore, V., Crabb, S. & Eliott, J. (2021). Critical considerations of workplace flexibility “for all” and gendered outcomes: Men being flexible about their flexibility. Gender, Work and Organization, 28(6), 2076-2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
4. Brink, K. E. & Zondag, M. M. (2021). Examining Job Attribute Preferences Across Three Generational Cohorts. Journal of Career Development, 48(1), 60-72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
5. Cai, J., & Szeidl, A. (2018). Interfirm relationships and business performance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(3), 1229-1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
6. Cox, K.C., Stewart, S.A., Lortie, J. & Barreto, T.S. (2019). Different strokes for different folks: Generational differences, social salience, and social performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 20(3), 170-181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
7. Dancakova, D., Sopko, J., Glova, J., & Andrejovska, A. (2022). The Impact of Intangible Assets on the Market Value of Companies: Cross-Sector Evidence. Mathematics, 10(20), 3819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
8. Durocher, S., Bujaki, M. & Brouard, F. (2016). Attracting Millennials: Legitimacy management and bottom-up socialization processes within accounting firms. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 39, 1-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
9. Eriksson, A., Orvik, A., Strandmark, M., Nordsteien, A. & Torp, S. (2017). Management and leadership approaches to health promotion and sustainable workplaces: A scoping review. Societies, 7(2), 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
10. Erro-Garcés, A. & Ferreira, S. (2019). Do better workplace environmental conditions improve job satisfaction? Journal of Cleaner Production, 219, 936-948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
11. Friberg, C. (2022). Feeling at Home Reflections on a Theme in Human Existence. ESPES. 11(2), pp. 20-27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
12. Glova, J., Bernatik, W. & Tulai, O. (2020). Determinant Effects of Political and Economic Factors on Country Risk: An Evidence from the EU Countries. Montenegrin Journal of Economics. 16. 37-53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
13. Heyns, M. M. & Kerr, M. D. (2018). Generational differences in workplace motivation. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, a967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
14. Chen, Y., Lyulyov, O., Pimonenko, T., Kwilinski, A. (2023). Green development of the country: Role of macroeconomic stability. Energy and Environment. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
15. Jirasevijinda, T. (2018). Bridging the generation gap in the workplace: how I learned to stop worrying and love working with the millennial generation. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 11(2), 83-86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
16. Kaiser, T. & Menkhoff, L. (2017). Does financial education impact financial literacy and financial behavior, and if so, when? World Bank Economic Review, 31(3), 611-630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
17. Kinnunen, U., Feldt, T., de Bloom, J., Sianoja, M., Korpela, K. & Geurts, S. (2017). Linking boundary crossing from work to nonwork to work-related rumination across time: A variable-and person-oriented approach. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22 (4), 467-480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
18. Kuvaas, B., Buch, R., Weibel, A., Dysvik, A. & Nerstad, C. G. L. (2017). Do intrinsic and extrinsic motivation relate differently to employee outcomes? Journal of Economic Psychology, 61, 244-258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
19. Mahmoud, A. B., Fuxman, L., Mohr, I., Reisel, W. D., & Grigoriou, N. (2021). “We aren’t your reincarnation!” workplace motivation across X, Y and Z generations. International Journal of Manpower. 42 (1), 193 – 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
20. Massingham, P. & Chandrakumara, A. (2019). Generational differences in work values and attitudes: Reintroducing retirees to the workforce. Journal of Population Ageing, 12, 491-513. [CrossRef]
21. Kultalahti, S. & Viitala, R. (2015). Generation Y – Challenging clients for HRM? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(1), 101-114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
22. Rani, N. & Samuel, A.A. (2019). Generational differences in relationship between prosocial identity fit and affective commitment. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 22(3), 259-277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
23. Rony, Z. T. (2019). Generation y challenges in becoming innovative leaders at organization in the 21st century. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2), 789-794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
24. Sarisska, M. & Balogova, B. (2021). Forensic social workers’ self-care. Ad Alta-journal of interdisciplinary research, 11(2), 240-243. [Google Scholar]
25. Safrankova, J. M., Sikyr, M., & Skypalova, R. (2020). Innovations in workforce management: challenges in the fourth industrial revolution. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 85-94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
26. Severo, E. A., de Sousa, J. C., & Montenegro, C. B. (2021). Corporate entrepreneurship: Internal factors of influence in educational institutions under the perception of Generations X and Y. International Journal of Innovation and Learning. 29 (4). 449 – 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
27. Spagnoli, P., Molino, M., Molinaro, D., Giancaspro, M. L., Manuti, A., & Ghislieri, C. (2020). Workaholism and Technostress During the COVID-19 Emergency: The Crucial Role of the Leaders on Remote Working. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 620310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
28. Szostek, D. (2021). Innovations in human resource management: impact of demographic characteristics, quality of interpersonal relationships on counterproductive work behaviours. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 11-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
29. Unguren, E., & Kacmaz, Y. Y. (2022). Innovations in Management of Hotel Employees: the Relationship Between Organizational Resilience and Work Engagement. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 141-150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
30. Wei, X., Wang, T., Chen, Y., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2023). The Effects of Population Aging on Sports Industry Development: The Mediating Effect of Technological Innovation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), 2085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
31. Wilkinson, K., Tomlinson, J., & Gardiner, J. (2018). The perceived fairness of work–life balance policies: A UK case study of solo-living managers and professionals without children. Human Resource Management Journal, 28(2), 325-339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
32. Weeks, K. P., & Schaffert, C. (2019). Generational Differences in Definitions of Meaningful Work: A Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(4), 1045-1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]