Abstract

Digital technologies, which have made significant progress in the last two decades, have paved the way for the emergence of many new-generation devices, platforms and applications. The increase in the use of these technologies has transformed many activities in daily life and significantly changed the business world. The concept of digital transformation, which has become a popular motto for many companies today, has improved the interaction between companies and consumers and changed how companies do business, making the transformation necessary. Digital transformation in businesses can be partial (such as establishing new departments or marketing channels) or major (such as changing the entire business model). In any case, digital transformation is a necessity of the current age. Human capital is vital in increasing the firm performance of companies and gaining a competitive advantage against their competitors. Today, one factor that can improve employees’ task performance in digital economies is digital competencies. Therefore, having a certain level of digital literacy among employees is crucial for companies to achieve adequate performance in digitalization and beyond. From this perspective, this research aims to determine the effect of employees’ digital literacy on their task performance and firm performance. Investigation of this topic in the paper is carried out in the following logical sequence: First of all, the research presents the conceptual framework for digital literacy, task performance, and firm performance. The results of studies in the literature are presented, and the hypothesis development process is based on the research results. The subsequent section provides information about the study’s methodology and findings. Finally, the research concludes with the results and discussion section. Within the scope of the study, data were collected from 222 white-collar employees in Istanbul through online questionnaires. A convenience sampling technique was used to determine the sample. SPSS 25 and SPSS Process 2.13 package programs were used to analyse the data. The research results show a medium-level relationship between digital literacy and task performance, a medium-level relationship between digital literacy and firm performance, and a high and positive relationship between firm performance and task performance. According to the mediation analysis results, employees’ digital literacy positively affects task performance and firm performance. In addition, it has been determined that task performance plays a mediating role in the effect of employees’ digital literacy on firm performance. It appears that company managers should prioritize the focus of the «Reskilling Revolution Initiative», which emphasizes the transformation of employees’ skills to attain sustainable competitive advantage and enable digital transformation.

Keywords: digital literacy, firm performance, human capital, task performance, white collar.

JEL Classification: M50, M54, O30, O32.

Cite as: Tatli, H. S., Yavuz, M. S., & Ongel, G. (2023). The Mediator Role of Task Performance in the Effect of Digital Literacy on Firm Performance. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 14(2), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2023.2-08

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Anderson, C., & Robey, D. (2017). Affordance potency: Explaining the actualization of technology affordances. Information and Organization, 27(2), 100-115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
2. Bagci, Z. (2014). Calisanlarin is doyumunun gorev ve baglamsal performanslari uzerindeki etkisi. Journal of Management and Economics Research, 12(24), 58-72.[Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
3. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
5. Bayar, M. (2020). Yalın yönetim anlayışının, çalışanların görev performansına etkilerine yönelik bir araştırma. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(2), 1984-2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
6. Bejakovic, P., & Mrnjavac, Z. (2020). The importance of digital literacy on the labour market. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 42(4), 921-932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
7. Bican, P. M., & Brem, A. (2020). Digital business model, digital transformation, digital entrepreneurship: Is there a sustainable «digital»? Sustainability, 12(13), 5239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
8. Boomsma, A. (1985). Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in LISREL maximum likelihood estimation. Psychometrika, 50, 229-242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
9. Camisón, C. (2004). Shared, competitive, and comparative advantages: A competence-based view of industrial-district competitiveness. Environment and Planning A, 36(12), 2227-2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
10. Cetindamar Kozanoglu, D., & Abedin, B. (2021). Understanding the role of employees in digital transformation: conceptualization of digital literacy of employees as a multi-dimensional organizational affordance. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(6), 1649-1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
11. Cetindamar, D., Abedin, B., & Shirahada, K. (2021). The role of employees in digital transformation: a preliminary study on how employees’ digital literacy impacts the use of digital technologies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
12. Chen, S. T., Haga, K. Y. A., & Fong, C. M. (2016). The effects of institutional legitimacy, social capital, and government relationship on clustered firms’ performance in emerging economies. Journal of Organizational Change Management. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
13. Chien, S. Y., & Tsai, C. H. (2012). Dynamic capability, knowledge, learning, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25(3), 434-444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
14. Downes, L., & Nunes, P. (2013). Big bang disruption. Harvard Business Review, 44-56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
15. Drydakis, N. (2022). Improving entrepreneurs’ digital skills and firms’ digital competencies through business apps training: A study of small firms. Sustainability, 14(8), 4417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
16. Ellinger, A. D., Ellinger, A. E., Yang, B., & Howton, S. W. (2002). The relationship between the learning organization concept and firms’ financial performance: An empirical assessment. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(1), 5-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
17. Eshet, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of educational multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106. [Google Scholar]
18. Freiling, J., Gersch, M., & Goeke, C. (2008). On the path towards a competence-based theory of the firm. Organization Studies, 29(8-9), 1143-1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
19. George, D. (2011). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple study guide and reference, 17.0 update, 10/e. Pearson Education India. [Google Scholar]
20. Goh, S. C., Elliott, C., & Quon, T. K. (2012). The relationship between learning capability and organizational performance: A meta‐analytic examination. The Learning Organization. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
21. Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A. & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
22. Goodman, S. A., & Svyantek, D. J. (1999). Person–organization fit and contextual performance: Do shared values matter? Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 55(2), 254-275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
23. Gravetter, J. F. & Forzano, L. B. (2012). Research methods for the behavioural sciences (4th ed). USA: Linda Schreiber-Ganster. Retrieved from [Link]
24. Gray, J., & Rumpe, B. (2017). Models for the digital transformation. Software & Systems Modeling, 16, 307-308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
25. Gurbuz, S. (2021). Mediator regulatory and situational impact analysis in social sciences (2nd ed.). Ankara: Seckin. [CrossRef]
26. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2014). Pearson’s new international edition. Multivariate Data Analysis, Seventh Edition. Pearson Education Limited Harlow, Essex. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
27. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4-40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
28. Huber, S. G. (2004). School leadership and leadership development: Adjusting leadership theories and development programs to values and the core purpose of school. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(6), 669-684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
29. Imran, M., Aziz, A., Hamid, S. N. B. A., Shabbir, M., Salman, R., & Jian, Z. (2018). Retracted: The mediating role of total quality management between entrepreneurial orientation and SMEs export performance. Management Science Letters, 8(6), 519-532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
30. Jackson, D. L. (2001). Sample size and number of parameter estimates in maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis: A Monte Carlo investigation. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(2), 205-223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
31. Jawahar, I. M., & Carr, D. (2007). Conscientiousness and contextual performance: The compensatory effects of perceived organizational support and leader‐member exchange. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(4), 330-349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
32. Kane, G. C., Phillips, A. N., Copulsky, J., & Andrus, G. (2019). How digital leadership is (n’t) different. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(3), 34-39. [Google Scholar]
33. Koc Basaran, Y. (2017). Sampling theory in social sciences. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 5(47), 480-495. [CrossRef]
34. Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C., Hildebrandt, V., Van Buuren, S., Van der Beek, A. J., & De Vet, H. C. (2013). Development of an individual work performance questionnaire. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(1), 6-28. [Google Scholar]
35. Kotarba, M. (2018). Digital transformation of business models. Foundations of Management, 10(1), 123-142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
36. Kumar, P., Pillai, R., Kumar, N., & Tabash, M. I. (2023). The interplay of skills, digital financial literacy, capability, and autonomy in financial decision making and well-being. Borsa Istanbul Review, 23(1), 169-183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
37. Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 179-228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
38. Lee, L. T., & Sukoco, B. M. (2007). The effects of entrepreneurial orientation and knowledge management capability on organizational effectiveness in Taiwan: The moderating role of social capital. International Journal of Management, 24(3), 549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
39. Leonardi, P. M. (2014). Social media, knowledge sharing, and innovation: Toward a theory of communication visibility. Information Systems Research, 25(4), 796-816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
40. Littlejohn, A., Beetham, H., & McGill, L. (2012). Learning at the digital frontier: A review of digital literacies in theory and practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6), 547-556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
41. Livingstone, S., Van Couvering, E., & Thumim, N. (2005). Adult media literacy. A review of the research literature: Department of Media and Communications. London School of Economics and Political Science. [Google Scholar]
42. Maimone, F., & Sinclair, M. (2014). Dancing in the dark: Creativity, knowledge creation and (emergent) organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 27(2), 344-361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
43. Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015). Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy. Computers & Education, 82, 11-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
44. Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065-1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
45. Nikou, S., De Reuver, M., & Mahboob Kanafi, M. (2022). Workplace literacy skills—how information and digital literacy affect adoption of digital technology. Journal of Documentation, 78(7), 371-391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
46. Obuobisa‐Darko, T. (2020). Ensuring employee task performance: Role of employee engagement. Performance Improvement, 59(8), 12-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
47. Öngel, V., Yavuz, М.S. & Tatli, H.S. (2022). Factors affecting digital literacy of human resources. The Manager, 13(1), 68–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
48. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
49. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185-227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
50. RVSPK, R., Priyanath, H. M. S., & Megama, R. G. N. (2020). Digital literacy, business uncertainty & economic performance: An empirical study of small businesses in Sri Lanka. Journal of Academic Research In Business And Social Sciences, 10(5), 50-76. [Google Scholar]
51. Sujarwo, S., Tristanti, T., & Kusumawardani, E. (2022). Digital literacy model to empower women using community-based education approach. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 14(1), 175-188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
52. Supriadi, Y. N., Desmintari, D., Resti, A. A., & Siregar, Z. M. E. (2021). The impact of digital economy literacy strategy model on firm performance of small medium enterprises. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 4(4), 10698-10710. [Google Scholar]
53. Swarupa, G. (2022). Gauging the impact of digital financial literacy on msme firms’ performance in India. (April 15, 2022). Proceedings of the Global Conference on Innovations in Management and Business (GCIMB 2021). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
54. Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (Vol. 6, pp. 497-516). Boston, MA: pearson. [Google Scholar]
55. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
56. Tekic, Z., & Koroteev, D. (2019). From disruptively digital to proudly analog: A holistic typology of digital transformation strategies. Business Horizons, 62(6), 683-693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
57. Tummers, L., Kruyen, P. M., Vijverberg, D. M., & Voesenek, T. J. (2015). Connecting HRM and change management: The importance of proactivity and vitality. Journal of Organizational Change Management. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
58. van Meeteren, M., Trincado-Munoz, F., Rubin, T. H., & Vorley, T. (2022). Rethinking the digital transformation in knowledge-intensive services: A technology space analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
59. Vargas, M. I. R. (2015). Determinant factors for small business to achieve innovation, high performance and competitiveness: organizational learning and leadership style. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 169, 43-52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
60. Vial, G. (2021). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Managing Digital Transformation, 13-66. [CrossRef]
61. Viswesvaran, C. (2002). Assessment of individual job performance: A review of the past century and a look ahead. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology, Vol. 1. Personnel psychology (pp. 110–126). Sage Publications Ltd [Google Scholar]
62. Wagner, H., Finkenzeller, T., Wurth, S., & Von Duvillard, S. P. (2014). Individual and team performance in team-handball: A review. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 13(4), 808. [Google Scholar]
63. Warner, K. S., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326-349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
64. Yanto, H., Baroroh, N., Hajawiyah, A., & Rahim, N. M. (2022). The Roles of entrepreneurial skills, financial literacy, and digital literacy in maintaining MSMEs during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 12(7), 504-517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
65. Zaied, A. N. H., Hussein, G. S., & Hassan, M. M. (2012). The role of knowledge management in enhancing organizational performance. International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business, 4(5), 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]