Marketing and Management of Innovations

ISSN (print) – 2218-4511 

ISSN (online) – 2227-6718

Registered in the Media Registrants-Register

Identifier in the register: P30-0117 Decision dated August 31, 2023, No. 759

The language of publication is English. 

Issued 4 times a year (March, June, September, December) since 2010

Business Model: Golden Open Access | APC Policy

Editor-in-Chieff             View Editorial Board

Oleksii Lyulyov

Sumy State University | Ukraine

Innovative Approaches to Improving the Process of Risk Management in the Context of Developing a Strategy for the Foreign Economic Activity of Enterprises

Anzhela Kuznyetsova 1,2,*,   , Damir Kulish 3 , , Borys Prykhodko 4 , Oleksandr Kuznyetsov 2

  1. Cracow University of Economics, Poland
  2. Sumy State University, Ukraine
  3. Zaporizhzhya National University, Ukraine
  4. Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Ukraine

     * Corresponding author

Received: 20 September 2023

Revised: 16 January 2024

Accepted: 10 March 2024

Abstract

The article presents innovative approaches to improving the risk management process in the context of developing a strategy for foreign economic activity of enterprise. To identify risks and choose the optimal strategy for foreign economic activity of enterprises (FEA), economic and mathematical modelling was used using the risk matrix and the criteria of Bayes, Laplace, Wald, Savage, Hurwitz, Hodge-Lehman. To approbate the results of the study, enterprises of the pharmaceutical industry were selected. According to the theory of games, in order to improve the risk management process, elements of the payment matrix have been applied, which characterize the profit of pharmaceutical enterprises in foreign economic activity. The use of the Hurwitz criterion, which is a criterion of pessimism-optimism, made it possible to choose the optimal strategy for the selected enterprises. The developed matrix of risks of foreign economic activity (strategic, operational, financial and external) for the selection of the optimal strategy of foreign economic activity through the use of economic and mathematical modelling should be used to determine the risks of the greatest impact at different stages of foreign economic activity using the theory of games. The presented matrix of risks of foreign economic activity is built for domestic enterprises of the pharmaceutical industry and is aimed at improving the process of risk management of foreign economic activity, which will enable enterprises of the pharmaceutical industry to predict risks at the early stages of activity and take into account in the general concept of the strategy of foreign economic activity of enterprises. The pharmaceutical industry of Ukraine was chosen for research because it is the most popular in modern conditions, and, according to the results of the analytical review, very high-risk. That is why the use of economic and mathematical modelling for risk calculation allows to optimize the economic behaviour of domestic pharmaceutical enterprises, while providing a reliable basis for making sound strategic decisions in the process of risk management in the context of developing a strategy for foreign economic activity. The risk management process, consisting of 7 stages and 18 steps, has been improved, and innovative tools have been proposed that facilitate the implementation of risk management in the enterprise in the process of developing a foreign trade strategy. The use of economic and mathematical modelling in risk forecasting and the formation of a foreign economic activity strategy will help enterprise managers to significantly increase management efficiency, reduce risks at the stage of planning foreign economic activity. The article improves the risk management process, which consists of 7 stages and 18 steps, and offers innovative tools that facilitate the implementation of risk management in the enterprise in the process of developing a foreign trade strategy. The use of economic and mathematical modelling in risk forecasting and the formation of a foreign economic activity strategy will help enterprise managers to significantly increase management efficiency, reduce risks at the stage of planning foreign economic activity.

Keywords: strategic management; transfer pricing; innovation; risks; strategy; risk matrix; foreign economic activity; game theory.

How to Cite: Kuznyetsova, A., Kulish, D., Prykhodko, B., & Kuznyetsov, O. (2024). Innovative Approaches to Improving the Process of Risk Management in the Context of Developing a Strategy for the Foreign Economic Activity of Enterprises. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 15(1), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2024.1-16

Abstract Views

PDF Downloads

References

  1. Andreeva, T., & Ritala, P. (2016). What are the sources of capability dynamism? Reconceptualizing dynamic capabilities from the perspective of organizational change. Baltic Journal of Management11(3), 238–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Anisimova, O., & Vitka, N. (2011). Risk management of foreign economic activity of a high-tech enterprise, Donetsk: Noulidzh, 176. [Google Scholar]
  3. Babailov, V., & Kurdenko, O. (2022). From risk management to risk economics. Economy and society, 46, 1–5 [Link]
  4. Beasley, M., Branson, B., & Pagach, D. (2015). An analysis of the maturity and strategic impact of investments in ERM. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy34(3), 219-243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Beregova, G. M., Schupletsov, A. F., & Klipin, A. O. (2019, July). Using Game Theory in Investing. In ” Humanities and Social Sciences: Novations, Problems, Prospects”(HSSNPP 2019)(pp. 807-811). Atlantis Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hernandez, R. M., & Dopico, M. I. B. (2017). Gestión de riesgos: reflexiones desde un enfoque de gestión empresarial emergente. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia22(80), 693–711. [Google Scholar]
  7. Calderon Hernandez, G., Alvarez Giraldo, C. M., & Naranjo Valencia, J. C. (2006). Gestión humana en las organizaciones un fenómeno complejo: evolución, retos, tendencias y perspectivas de investigación. Cuadernos de administración19(32), 225–254. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chenhall, R. H. (2008). Accounting for the horizontal organization: A review essay. Accounting, Organizations and Society33(4-5), 517–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (2004). Trad. Instituto de Auditores Internos de España/PricewaterhouseCoopers. New Jersey: COSO. [Link]
  10. Deloitte (2017), Risk Advisory. Obtenido el 27 de Octubre desde. [Link]
  11. Derhachova, V. V., & Rudnitska, Yu. V. (2020). Risk management of foreign economic activity in the convention of the covid-19 pandemic. Ekonomika ta derzhava, 12, 15–20. [CrossRef]
  12. Fernandez, A. F., & Rodríguez, M. D. C. M. (1997). Contabilidad de gestión y excelencia empresarial. Grupo Planeta (GBS). [Google Scholar]
  13. Garafonova, O., Gruzina, I., Kozyrieva, O., Pishchenko, O., & Tarasiuk, H. (2023a). Strategic perspectives of functioning of ukrainian organizations in the conditions of eurointegration and globalization of the digital economy. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 1(48), 298–311. [CrossRef]
  14. Garafonova, O., Marhasova, V., Tkalenko, N., Shut, O., & Kozyrieva, O. (2023b). Substantiation of the methodology for assessing the level of customer service of pharmaceutical companies. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 5(46), 398–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gerasimenko, O. M (2013). Formation of the complex system of risk management with consideration of sensitivity to market risks. Efficient economy, 5. [Link]
  16. Hryhorieva, M. & Kobrzhytsky, V. (2015). Improvement of risk management foreign economic activity in Ukraine. Investments: practice and experience, 1, 25–29. [Google Scholar]
  17. International Federation of Accountants, IFAC. (2012). Professional Accountants in Business Committee International Good Practice Guidance Eleven Principles for Effective Business Reporting Processes. [Link]
  18. Institute of Management Accountants, IMA. (2011). Statements on Management Accounting (SMA). Finance Governance, Risk, And Compliance Enterprise Risk Management: Frameworks, Elements, and Integration. [Link]
  19. International Standard Organization, ISO. (2009). 31000: 2009, Risk Management—Principles and Guidelines. First edition, Geneva. [Link]
  20. Institute of Internal Auditors, IIA. (2009). IIA Position Paper: The role of internal auditing in enterprise-wide risk management. [Link]
  21. Ilyashenko, S. (2004). Еconomic risk. Tutorial. – 2-he vyd., dopovn.ta pererob. – K.: Tsentr navchalnoi literatury– 220 s. – (Problemy analizu).
  22. Karlin, M. I., Stashchuk, O. V., & Borysyuk, O. V. (2021). Financial aspects of taking into account new economic risks in the activity of enterprises. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice4(39), 376–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Onopriienko, K., Lovciova, K., Mateašova, M., Kuznyetsova, A., & Vasylieva, T. (2023). Economic policy to support lifelong learning system development & SDG4 achievement: Bibliometric analysis. Knowledge and Performance Management7(1), 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Klymenko, S. M. (2013). Risk management in the enterprise development management system. Ekonomika, sotsiolohiia, pravo. 1. 99-103. [Link]
  25. KPMG Riskconsulting (2017). Obtenido el 5 de Enero desde. [Link]
  26. Kulish, D., Khudolei, V., Churkina, I., Kirtoka, R., Prykhodko, B., & Kuznyetsov, O. (2024). Development and implementation of the financial model of export in the context of strategic planning of foreign economic activity of enterprises. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 1(54), 216–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kuznyetsova, A., Sydorchenko, T., Zadvorna, O., Nikonenko, U., & Khalina, O. (2021). Assessment of aspects of the COVID-19 crisis in the context of ensuring economic security. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering11(6), 615–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mashina, N. (2003). Economic risk and methods of its measurement. K. : Tsentr navchalnoi literatury,– 188 s.
  29. McShane, M. K., Nair, A., & Rustambekov, E. (2011). Does enterprise risk management increase firm value? Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance26(4), 641–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Miller, P., Kurunmäki, L., & O’Leary, T. (2008). Accounting, hybrids and the management of risk. Accounting, organizations and society33(7-8), 942–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mischuk, Ye., & Holiver, V. (2015). Management of the processes of enterprise adaptation to external environment: innovative tendencies. Agrosvit, 6. 44-48. URL: [Link]
  32. Karyy, O., Kulyniak, I., Halkiv, L., Ohinok, S., & Struchok, N. (2021). Evaluation of the Tourist Attractiveness of Ukraine’s Regions in the Conditions of Uncertainty Using Game Theory. In 2021 11th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies, ACIT 2021-Proceedings(pp. 351-355). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ozel, D. (2005). Risks in foreign trade and their impact on the organization and implementation of international settlements. Culture of the peoples of the Black Sea region, 59. 146-148. URL: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/34876
  34. Popescul, D., & Georgescu, M. (2013). Social Media–a new challenge for the personal information and knowledge management. In Proceedings of SMART(pp. 6-9). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Power, M. (2009). The risk management of nothing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6–7), 849–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Podrieza, S. (2010). The mechanism of risk management at the enterprise-subjects of foreign economic activity.
  37. PricewaterhouseCoopers, PWC. (2017). Risk management. Obtenido el 8 de Octubre desde The Resilience Journal and Risk Insights Blog.
  38. Prymostka, L., Krasnova І., Okhrymenko, I., Shchehliuk, M., & Prymostka, A. (2024). Development of financial risk hedging strategies. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 1(54), 68–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Riazanova, N. O. (2022). Formation of a risk management system at industrial enterprises. Akademichnyi ohliad. 1(56), 63–71. [CrossRef]
  40. Securities Exchange Commission SEC (2010). [Link]
  41. Dreyer, S. J., & Ingram, D. (2008). Standard & Poor’s to Apply Enterprise Risk Analysis to Corporate Ratings. [Link]
  42. Tkachuk, H., Vyhovskyj, V., & Renchkovskaya, V. (2022). Risk management in the enterprise management system. Infrastruktura Rynku, 63, 88–92. [CrossRef]
  43. Tyulienieva, Yu.V. (2011). integrated approach to determining enterprise risks [Link]]
  44. Vasylieva, T. A., Lieonov, S. V., & Kryvych, Ya. (2015). Economic risk: assessment and management methods. Tutorial. Under the general editorship of T. A. Vasylieva, Y. M. Kryvych – Sumy: DVNZ “UABS NBU”, 2015. – 208 p. [Link]
  45. Vitlinskyi, V. V., Piskunova, O. V., Tkach, O. V., Skitsko V. I., & Novoseletskyi O. M. (2014). Mathematical models and methods of market economy : practicum [Google Scholar]
  46. Vitlinsky, V. V., & Velikoivanenko, G. I. (2004). Riskology in Economics and Entrepreneurship: Monograph, 365.[Google Scholar]
  47. Zelinska, H., Andrusiv, U., Galtsova, O., & Dmytrechenko, M. (2021). Management of social risks and their impact on the spheres of human life in the conditions of sustainable development of Ukraine. Problemy ekorozwoju16(2), 116–124. [Google Scholar]
  48. Wu, D. D., & Olson, D. L. (2009). Enterprise risk management: small business scorecard analysis. Production Planning and Control20(4), 362–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

View articles in other formats

License

Coyright

Copyright (c) 2024 The Author(s).

Published by Sumy State University

Issue