Marketing and Management of Innovations

ISSN (print) – 2218-4511 

ISSN (online) – 2227-6718

Registered in the Media Registrants-Register

Identifier in the register: R30-01179 Decision dated August 31, 2023, No. 759

The language of publication is English. 

Issued 4 times a year (March, June, September, December) since 2010

Business Model: Golden Open Access | APC Policy

Publisher & Founder:

logo_longENG

Editor-in-Chieff             View Editorial Board

Oleksii Lyulyov

Sumy State University | Ukraine

Innovation Activity of Slovak SMEs Operating in the ICT Sector

Eniko Korcsmaros 1 , , Renata Machova 1,*,   , Angelika Csereova 1,  , Zdenko Metzker 2, 
  1. J. Selye University, Slovakia

  2. Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Czechia

     * Corresponding author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2024.4-06

Pages: 72–84

Received: 12 April 2024

Revised: 25 October 2024

Accepted: 20 December 2024

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyse contemporary trends in innovation among small and medium–sizedenterprises in Slovakia’s ICT sector. The study explored different types of innovations, the factors that either promote or hinder innovation, and the innovative practices of small and medium–sized enterprises within this sector. To achieve thisgoal, a questionnaire survey was conducted between September 2021 and February 2022. The research sample consisted of 1,000 randomly selected small and medium–sized enterprises operating in the ICT sector, drawn from a total of 8,416 eligible companies. Ultimately, 124 respondents completed the questionnaire, including 73 microenterprises and 51 small and medium–sized enterprises. The research hypotheses were evaluated via descriptive statistical analysis and the Z score methodology. The findings revealed that the most prominent form of innovation in Slovakia’s ICT sector was service innovation, followed by product innovation and the adoption of new production processes. The primary motivational factor driving innovation is the desire to achieve high customer satisfaction by meeting customer needs and enhancing service quality. Conversely, the most significant barrier to innovation was identified as a lack of time. The study indicated that approximately 75% of small and medium–sized enterprises intend to pursue innovation within the next few years. Moreover, innovation plans were more pronounced among small and medium–sized enterprises than among microenterprises. The primary areas of interest for future innovations included enhancing existing products and services, developing new products or services, and implementing new technologies or production processes. With respect to the research hypotheses, no statistically significant differences were observed between the innovation activities of microenterprises and those of small and medium–sized enterprises.

Keywords: SME; innovation; ICT sector; factors supporting innovation; factors hindering innovation. 

How to Cite: Korcsmaros, E., Machova, R., Csereova, A., & Metzker, Z. (2024). Innovation Activity of Slovak SMEs Operating in ICT Sector. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 15(4), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2024.4-06

Abstract Views

PDF Downloads

ccbyThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

  1. Acenoglu, D., Akcigit, U., & Alp Celik, M. (2022) Radical and incremental innovation: The Role of Firms, Managers and Innovators. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 14(3) 199–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ali, K., Jianguo, D., Kirikkaleli, D., Olah, J., & Altuntaş, M. (2023). Do green technological innovation, financial development, economic policy uncertainty, and institutional quality matter for environmental sustainability? All Earth, 35(1), 82–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. AlQershi, N. A., Diah, M. L. B. M., Latiffi, A. B. A., & Ahmad, W. N. K. W. (2020). Strategic innovation and competitive advantage of manufacturing SMEs: the mediating role of human capital. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 24(3), 70–89. [Google Schoolar] [CrossRef]
  4. Androniceanu, A. (2023). The new trends of digital transformation and artificial intelligence in public administration. Revista» Administratie si Management Public «(RAMP), 40, 147–155. [Google Scholar] . [CrossRef]
  5. Androniceanu, A., Nica, E., Georgescu, I., & Sabie, O. M. (2021). The influence of the ICT on the control of corruption in public administrations of the EU member states: a comparative analysis based on panel data. Administratie si Management Public, 37, 41–59. [Google Scholar]
  6. Arias-Pérez, J., Velez-Ocampo, J., & Cepeda-Cardona, J. (2021). Strategic orientation toward digitalization to improve innovation capability: why knowledge acquisition and exploitation through external embeddedness matter. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(5), 1319–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bathallath, S., Smedberg, Å., & Kjellin, H. (2016). Managing project interdependencies in IT/IS project portfolios: a review of managerial issues. International journal of information systems and project management, 4(1), 67–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Belanova, K. (2021). Innovation performance of the Slovak Republic. Balkan and Near Eastern Journal of Social Sciences, 7, 24-28. [Google Scholar]
  9. Belas, J., & Rahman, A. (2023). Financial management of the company. Are there differences of opinion between owners and managers in the SME segment. Journal of Business Sectors, 1(1), 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  10. Belas, J., Rahman, A., Rahman, M. T., & Schonfeld, J. (2017). Financial constraints on innovative SMEs: empirical evidence from the Visegrad countries. Engineering Economics, 28(5), 552–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Belas, J., Strnad, Z., Gavurova, B., & Cepel, M. (2019). Business environment quality factors research-sme management´ s platform. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 20(1), 64– [Google Scholar]
  12. Bratianu, C., Neştian, A. Ş., & Guţă, A. L. (2022). Knowledge risks taxonomy based on the organizational knowledge dynamics. Ekonomicko-manazerske spektrum, 16(2), 61–71. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ceptureanu, S. I. (2015). Competitiveness of SMES. Business Excellence and Management, 5(2), 55–67. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chelliah, M. K., Aravindan, K. L., & Muthaiyah, S. (2023). Entrepreneurial orientation and open innovation promote the performance of services smes: The mediating role of cost leadership. Administrative Sciences, 13(1), 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cimo, J., & Mariaši, M. (2006). Inovačný manažment. Bratislava: GeoPARNAS
  16. Civelek, M., Ključnikov, A., Fialova, V., Folvarčna, A., & Stoch, M. (2021). Major obstacles in innovative activities of family-owned SMEs: evidence from Czechia. Economics & Sociology, 14(2), 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dinu, E. (2022). A systematic review of the literature on intellectual capital management, technology and innovation. Ekonomicko-manazerske spektrum, 16(1), 58–75. [Google Scholar]
  18. Dobrovic, J., Gallo, P., Mihalcova, B., Stofova, L., & Szaryszova, P. (2018). Competitiveness measurement in terms of the Europe 2020 strategy. Journal of competitiveness, 10(4), 21–37. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dubyna, M., Kholiavko, N., Zhavoronok, A., Safonov, Y., Krylov, D., & Tochylina, Y. (2022). The ICT Sector in Economic Development of the Countries of Eastern Europe: a Comparative Analysis. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 19, 169–185. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
  20. Dura, C. C., Iordache, A. M. M., Ionescu, A., Isac, C., & Breaz, T. O. (2022). Analysing performance in wholesale trade Romanian SMEs: Framing circular economy business scenarios. Sustainability, 14(9), 5567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dzikowski, P. (2022). Product and process innovation patterns in Polish low and high technology systems.  Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 17(3), 747–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fila, M., Levicky, M., Mura, L., Maros, M., & Korenkova, M. (2020). Innovations for business management: Motivation and barriers. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 266–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gallo, P., Kusnirova, R., Vachal, J., Strakova, J., & Rauser, D. (2023). Application of BSC and EFQM models in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Business Sectors, 1(1), 20–31. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gomezelj Omerzel, D., & Smolčić Jurdana, D. (2016). The influence of intellectual capital on innovativeness and growth in tourism SMEs: empirical evidence from Slovenia and Croatia. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 29(1), 1075–1090. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
  25. Grimsdottir, E., & Edvardsson, I. R. (2018). Knowledge Management, Knowledge Creation, and Open Innovation in Icelandic SMEs. SAGE Open, 8(4). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Grishunin, S., Suloeva, S., & Burova, E. (2022). Development of Risk Management Mechanism and the System of Risk Metrics to Evaluate and Enhance the Long-Term Orientation of the Strategies of Non-Financial Companies. Risks, 10(9), 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ha, V. D., Nguyen, V.T., & Dang, T.T.N. (2022). The Impact of Capital on Growth of Small and Medium Enterprises: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 9(1), 0353–0362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hao, J., Li, C., Yuan, R., Ahmed, M., Khan, M. A., & Olah, J. (2020). The influence of the knowledge-based network structure hole on enterprise innovation performance: The threshold effect of R&D investment intensity. Sustainability, 12(15), 6155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ivanova, E. (2017). Barriers to the development of SMEs in the Slovak Republic. Oeconomia Copernicana, 8(2), 255–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ivanova, E., & Cepel, M. (2018). The Impact of Innovation Performance on the Competitiveness of the Visegrad 4 Conutries. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(1), 54–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Khan, K. A., Akhtar, M. A., Vishwakarma, R. K., & Hoang, H. C. (2023). A sectoral perspective on the sustainable growth of SMEs. Empirical research in the V4 countries. Journal of Business Sectors, 1(1), 10–19. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kim, S. S. (2021). Sustainable growth variables by industry sectors and their influence on changes in business models of SMEs in the era of digital transformation. Sustainability, 13(13), 7114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Konstantopoulou, A., Rizomyliotis, I., Konstantoulaki, K., & Badahdah, R. (2019). Improving SMEs’ competitiveness with the use of Instagram influencer advertising and eWOM. International journal of organizational analysis, 27(2), 308–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kostiukevych, R., Bilan, Y., Mishchuk, H., Sułkowska, J., & Kostiukevych, A. (2020). Possibilities of Integration of Strategic and Project Management in The Supporting System of Small and Medium-Sized Businesses at Local and Regional Levels. Proceedings of the 35th International Business Information Management Association (IBIMA), 1–12.
  35. Kot, S. (2023). Development insights on supply chain management in small and medium-sized enterprises. Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kuczewska, J., & Tomaszewski, T. (2022). Exploring potential drivers of innovation-related activities in Poland: evidence from Polish business clusters. Equilibrium, 17(3), 775-801 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kuivalainen, O., Sundqvist, S., & Servais, P. (2007). Firms’ degree of born-globalness, international entrepreneurial orientation and export performance. Journal of world business, 42(3), 253–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lewandowska, A. (2021). Interactions between investments in innovation and SME competitiveness in the peripheral regions. Journal of International Studies, 14(1), 285–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liñan, F., Paul, J., & Fayolle, A. (2020). SMEs and entrepreneurship in the era of globalization: advances and theoretical approaches. Small Business Economics, 55, 695–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Loučanova, E., & Nosaľova, M. (2020). Eco-innovation performance in Slovakia: Assessment based on ABC analysis of eco-innovation indicators. BioResources, 15(3), 5355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Loučanova, E., Olšiakova, M., & Štofkova, J. (2022). Open business model of eco-innovation for sustainability development: Implications for the open-innovation dynamics of Slovakia. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(2), 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ma, J., Li, Z., Liu, Z., Zhang, S., & Lai, W. (2022). Influence of Management Education on Enterprise Scientific and Technological Innovation Based on K‐Means Clustering Algorithm. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022(1), 9030862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Machova, R., Korcsmaros, E., Csereova, A., & Varga, J. (2023). Innovation activity of Slovak ICT SMEs. Journal of Business Sectors, 1(1), 32–41. [Google Scholar]
  44. Malega, P., Rudy, V., Kovac, J., & Kovac, J. (2019). The Competitive Market Map as the Basis for an Evaluation of the Competitiveness of the Slovak Republic on an International Scale. Journal of Competitiveness, 11(4), 103–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Małkowska, A., & Uhruska, M. (2022). Factors affecting SMEs growth: the case of the real estate valuation service industry. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(1), 79–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Meyer, D. F., & Meyer, N. (2017). Management of small and medium enterprise (SME) development: An analysis of stumbling blocks in a developing region. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 16(1), 127–141. [Gogle Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Potkany, M., Gejdos, P., Lesnikova, P., & Schmidtova, J. (2020). Influence of quality management practices on the business performance of Slovak manufacturing enterprises. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 17(9), 161–180. [Google Scholar]
  48. Potkany, M., Haškova, S., Lesníkova, P., & Schmidtova, J. (2022). Perception of essence of controlling and its use in manufacturing enterprises in time of crisis: does controlling fulfil its essence?. Journal of business economics and management, 23(4), 957–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Prause, M. (2019). Challenges of industry 4.0 technology adoption for SMEs: the case of Japan. Sustainability, 11(20), 5807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rašner, J. (2009). Organizačné inovacie. Zvolen: Vydavateľstvo Technickej univerzity vo Zvolene.
  51. Remišova, A., & Lašakova, A. (2020). Unethical practices in the Slovak business environment: Entrepreneurs vs. the State?. Ethics & Bioethics, 10(1-2), 78–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rigtering, J. C., Eggers, F., Kraus, S., & Chang, M. L. (2017). Entrepreneurial orientation, strategic planning and firm performance: The impact of national cultures. European Journal of International Management, 11(3), 301–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rozsa, Z., Belas, J., Khan, K. A., & Zvarikova, K. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and essential factors of personnel risk management in SMEs. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 23(2), 449-463 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ruiz-Palomo, D., Fernandez-Gamez, M.A., & León-Gómez, A. (2022). Analysing the Effect of Financial Constraints on Technological and Management Innovation in SMEs: A Gender Perspective. SAGE Open, 12(1), 1– [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Savur, S. (2017). Role of exemplars in ethical decision-making in small and medium enterprises (SMEs). In Responsible Leadership and Ethical Decision-Making, 17, 21–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Slovak Business Agency. (2020). Inovačný potencial MSP na Slovensku. Bratislava: SBA.
  57. Štatistický úrad SR (2022). [Link]
  58. Štofkova, J., Štofko, S., & Loučanova, E. (2017). Possibilities of using e-learning system of education at universities. INTED Proceedings, 6965–6972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Świadek, A., Dzikowski, P., Gorączkowska, J., & Tomaszewski, M. (2022). The national innovation system in a catching-up country: Empirical evidence based on micro data of a Triple Helix in Poland. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(2), 511–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tacoglu, C., Ceylan, C., & Kazancoglu, Y. (2019). Analysis of variables affecting competitiveness of SMEs in the textile industry. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 20(4), 648–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Taques, F. H., López, M. G., Basso, L. F., & Areal, N. (2021). Indicators used to measure service innovation and manufacturing innovation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(1), 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tomaškova, E., & Kanovska, L. (2022). Impact of cooperation flexibility on innovation flexibility in SMEs.  Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 17(2), 533–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Toomsalu, L., Tolmacheva, S., Vlasov, A., & Chernova, V. (2019). Determinants of innovations in small and medium enterprises: A European and international experience. Terra Economicus, 17(2), 112–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ungerman, O., Dedkova, J., & Gurinova, K. (2018). The impact of marketing innovation on the competitiveness of enterprises in the context of industry 4.0. Journal of competitiveness, 10(2), 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Vivier, E. (2013). ‘A tough line to work through’: ethical ambiguities in a South African SME. African Journal of Business Ethics, 7(2), 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Vuorio, A., Torkkeli, L., & Sainio, L. M. (2020). Service innovation and internationalization in SMEs: antecedents and profitability outcomes. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 18(1), 92–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wall, P. W. (2021). Determinants of SMEs performance – from business strategy to innovation. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 23(2), 537–554. [Google Scholar]
  68. Woźniak, M. (2021). Sustainable approach in IT project management—methodology choice vs. Client satisfaction. Sustainability, 13(3), 1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yi, M., Wang, Y., Yan, M., Fu, L., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Government R&D subsidies, environmental regulations, and their effect on green innovation efficiency of manufacturing industry: Evidence from the Yangtze River economic belt of China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4), 1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Z Score Calculator. (2023). [Link]
  71. Zvaríkova, K., Bařinova, D., Belas, J., & Palčak, Ľ. (2023). Empirical research on business ethics of SMEs in the V4 countries. Ethics & Bioethics, 13(1-2), 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

View articles in other formats

License

ccby This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Coyright

Copyright (c) 2024 The Author(s).

Published by Sumy State University

Issue

Contacts

Sumy State University
116, Kharkivska st., 40007 Sumy, Ukraine

e-mail: mmi@fem.sumdu.edu.ua

About us

About publisher Sumy State University

Journal’s history

Advertising 

Follow us

LinkedIn

Twitter

 

Company 2023 © Sumy State University