Abstract

The aim of the article. The aim of the article is to study the scientific development of foreign scientific schools of risk management and analysis of their main publications; the allocation of foreign scientific schools of risk management. The results of the analysis. Research of modern risk management is carried out leading foreign schools. The most famous school in the theory of financial risk and risk management is American school. Among its current members are D. Galai, H. Greuning, A. Damodaran, P. Jorion, J. Kallman, M. Crouhy, M. Mccarthy, R. Mark, T. Flynn and other scientists. Important contribution to the development of the theory and practice of risk management made British scientists and economists – the representatives of English Schools of Risk Management: T. Andersen, T. Bedford, A. Griffin, A. Zaman, R. Cooke, P. Sweeting, P. Hopkin, a German P. Schroder and others. A significant advance to the theory of risk management of German scientific school, based on the classic work of Zadeh has received significant results of the risk assessment using fuzzy logic and fuzzy sets. Graduate School of Risk Management of the University of Cologne is training and research group funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) under the project «Theoretical and Empirical Basis of Risk Management». The aim of Graduate School of Risk Management is to promote young scientists. The school risk management of the University of Cologne outstanding research conducted by German and foreign professors, such as: K. Mosler, A. Kempf, C. Kuhner, T. Hartmann-Wendels, C. Homburg, D. Hess, D. Sliwka, F. Schmid, H. Schradin. The author noted the existence and fruitful work in the capital of Switzerland Laboratory of risk management (Risk Lab Switzerland) and its leading scientists: P. Embrechts, A. Gisler, M. Wüthrich, H. Bühlmann, V. Bignozzi, M. Hofert, P. Deprez, and the Basel Committee on banking supervision – Developer international standards of Basel II and Basel III. Significant achievements of the international higher education risk management (IGSRM), which headquarters are located in Sydney (Australia), and representative offices located in Washington, Mumbai, Shanghai and Wellington. Graduates of the program are in high demand because of their unique skills and risk management practices. Conclusions and directions of further researches. Thus, the author studied foreign schools of risk management, made the analysis of main representatives of these research schools, studied such schools of Risk Management as American, English, German, Australian, Japanese scientific schools (Mamdani, Sugeno, Tsukamoto).  

Keywords: foreign schools of risk management, research, risk, risk management, publication

JEL Classification: B20, N00, N01.

Cite as: Posokhov, I. (2013). Analysis of foreign schools of risk management . Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 164-172. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2013.4-15

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Andersen T., & Schrøder P. (2010). Strategic Risk Management Practice: How to Deal Effectively with Major Corporate Exposures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [in English].
2. Bedford, T., & Cooke, R. (2001). Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [in English].
3. Borodina, S., Shvyrkov, O., & Bouis, Jean-Claude. (2010). Investing in BRIC countries: evaluating risk and governance in Brazil, Russia, India, & China. New York: McGraw-Hill [in English].
4. Cox, E. (2005). Fuzzy Modeling and Genetic Algorithms for Data Mining and Exploration (The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Data Management Systems). Morgan Kaufmann [in English].
5. Crouhy, M., Galai, D., & Mark, R. (2012). Risk Management. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill [in English].
6. Damodaran, A. (2008). Strategic Risk Taking: A Framework for Risk Management. Pennsylvania: Pearson Prentice Hall [in English].
7. Gregory, M. (2008). Enterprise Risk Management: A Methodology for Achieving Strategic Objectives (Wiley and SAS Business Series). Wiley [in English].
8. Greuning H. van, & Brajovic Bratanovic S. (2009). Analyzing Banking Risk. A Framework for Assessing Corporate Governance and Financial Risk Management. 3rd ed. Washington: The World Bank [in English].
9. Griffin, A. (2007). New Strategies for Reputation Management: Gaining Control of Issues, Crises & Corporate Social Responsibility. London: Kogan Page Publishers [in English].
10. Hopkin, P. (2010). Fundamentals of Risk Management: Understanding, Evaluating and Implementing Effective Risk Management. Kogan Page [in English].
11. Jorion, P. (2006). Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk. 3rd еd. New York: McGraw-Hill [in English].
12. Kallman, J. (2007). Instructors’ manual, the Tools & Techniques of Risk Management & Insurance. National Underwriter, Cincinnati, OH [in English].
13. Kallman, J. (2005). Risk Control, First Edition, ARM 55, Insurance Institute of America. Malvern, PA [in English].
14. Mamdani, E., & Assilian, S. (1975). An Experiment in Linguistic Synthesis with Fuzzy Logic Controller. Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 7, 1, 1-13 [in English].
15. Mccarthy, M., & Flynn, T. (2003). Risk From the CEO and Board Perspective: What All Managers Need to Know About Growth in a Turbulent World. New York: McGraw Hill [in English].
16. Sweeting, P. (2011). Financial Enterprise Risk Management (International Series on Actuarial Science). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [in English].
17. Zaman, A. (2004). Reputational Risk: How To Manage For Value. London: Creation FT Prentice Hall [in English].