Abstract

The aim of the article. The aim of the article is to justify the methodical recommendations on formation and implementation of a mechanism for assessing the current state of technological market of Ukraine, to identify the problems of its development and to form the ways to eliminate them. The results of the analysis. The analysis of current state and prospects of the Ukrainian market of intellectual and innovative technologies development is made. It is proposed a set of indicators that can characterize the current state of modern technological market. The author offered to include indicators of intellectual and innovative activity of Ukraine, which will characterize he level of patent activity, the level of inventive activity, the level of implementation of inventive capacity, the level of technological dependence of the country, the level of intellectual independence of the country, the level of technological distribution, the quality level of domestic scientific and technological developments. It is proposed to assess the state of technological market of the country using citation indexes of scientific research (Hirsch index). The author conducted a questionnaire survey of machine-building industrial enterprises of Kharkiv region to clarify the most significant constraint on industrial enterprises innovative development, adversely affect patent activity, not conducive to the development of inventions and the development of intellectual and innovative technologies. It is identified the most significant factors hindering innovation development, adversely affect patent activity, not conducive to the development of inventions and the development of intellectual and innovative technologies. The ways of solving problems of technological development of machine-building enterprises are suggested. Conclusions and directions of further researches. The following provisions of innovation policy subject are proposed on the basis of the research: (a) innovation policy of the industrial enterprise should organically combine the possibilities of international and national technology transfer and create the own process of innovation or the improvement of existing innovations; (b) to enhance the processes of creative and innovative ideas generation the main provisions of the innovation policy should be brought not only to representatives of senior management, but also to every researcher; (с) the formation of innovation policy should be implemented with the available feedback, including specific proposals of innovative processes leaders and their direct perpetrators; (d) important component of the innovation policy of the country and individual companies should be creative and stimulating creative activity; (e) inventive activity of industrial enterprises researchers must make a tangible contribution to current and future development of an enterprise. The proposals in the article can be real only if creating and maintaining of favorable conditions of scientific research and inventive activity is the important basis of innovative development of industrial enterprises and inventive activities. It is an important basis of industrial enterprise’s innovative development. Further research in this direction should be associated with the identification of functioning features of technological sphere in several sectors of Ukrainian economy. It is extremely important to conduct this kind of research at engineering enterprises, which are the basis and bearer of scientific and technical progress.

Keywords: technology market, smart technologies, citation metrics, innovation development, engineering enterprises

JEL Classification: D40, M21, O14, O32.

Cite as: Kosenko, A. (2015). Research of the problems of Ukrainian intellectual and innovative technologies market and development of the ways of their solving . Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 144-158. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2015.2-12

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Analiz situatsii v sfere intellektualnoi sobstvennosti v Rossii po itoham deiatelnosti Rospatenta v 2014 hodu [Analysis of the situation in the field of intellectual property in Russia following the results of the activities of Rospatent in 2014]. (n.d.) http://tpprf.ru. Retrieved from http://tpprf.ru/common/upload/documents/ [in Russian].
2. Androshhuk, G.O. (2003). Orhanіzatsіino-ekonomіchnі aspekty stymuliuvannia іnnovatsіinoi dіialnostі [Organizational and economic aspects of innovation]. Extendet abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kiev [in Ukrainian].
3. Boiarinova, K.O. (2010). Rozvytok vynakhіdnytstva na pіdpryiemstvakh na osnovі realіzaysіi іnnovacіinoї polіtyky [The development of innovation in enterprises through the implementation of innovation policy]. (n.d.). www.rusnauka.com. Retrieved from http://www.rusnauka.com/ 2_ANR_2010/Economics/10_57165.doc.htm [in Ukrainian].
4. Grabchenko, A.I. (1999). Osnovy marketinha vysokykh tekhnolohii [Principles of marketing high technology]. Kharkov: ChGPU [in Russian].
5. Gritsulenko, S.І. (2013). Ukraina v mіzhnarodnomu obmіnі іntelektualnoiu vlasnіstiu [Ukraine in the international exchange of intellectual property]. (2014). www.rusnauka.com. Retrieved from http://www.rusnauka.com/5_SWMN_2014/Economics/2_157661.doc.htm [in Ukrainian].
6. Dudko, D. (2012). Patentnaia statistika kak instrument analiza nauchno-tekhnolohicheskoi sfery Rossii [Patent statistics as a tool for analysis of scientific and technological sphere of Russia]. Intellektualnaia sobstvennost. Promyshlennaia sobstvennost – Intellectual property. Industrial property, 10, 17-24 [in Russian].
7. Zakharkіn, O.O. (2014). Rol іnnovatsіi u naroshchennі vartostі ukrainskykh pіdpriemstv [The role of innovation in increasing of Ukrainian enterprises cost]. Marketynh і menedzhment іnnovatsіi – Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 90-101 [in Ukrainian].
8. Karpov, E.S. (2014). Statisticheskoie issledovaniie patentnoi aktivnosti v Rossii i stranakh mira [Statistical study of patent activity in Russia and countries of the world]. Extendet abstract of candidate’s thesis. Moscow [in Russian].
9. Kuznetsova, L.A. (2013). Rynok intellektualnoi sobstvennosti i eho razvitie v Rossii [The intellectual property of market and its development in Russia]. Extendet abstract of candidate’s thesis. Voronezh [in Russian].
10. Naukova ta іnnovatsіina dіialnіst v Ukrainі. Statystychnyi zbіrnyk Ukrainy za 2013 rіk [Scientific and innovative activity in Ukraine. Statistical Yearbook of Ukraine for 2013]. Іnformatsіino-analіtychne ahentstvo – Information and Analytical Agency. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
11. Naukovo-tekhnolohіchna sfera Ukrainy 2010-2014 rіk [Scientific-technological sphere of Ukraine 2010-2014]. (n.d.) www.nas.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://www.nas.gov.ua/siaz/ Ways_of_development_of_Ukrainian_science/article/13112.055.pdf [in Ukrainian].
12. Pererva, P.G., & Tkacheva N.P. (2011). Synerhetychnyi efekt benchmarkіnhu konkurentnykh perevah [Synergistic effect of benchmarking of competitive advantages]. Marketynh і menedzhment іnnovatsіi – Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 55-66 [in Ukrainian].
13. Pererva, P.G. (2008). Ekonomіka ta orhanіzatsіia іnnovatsіinoi dіialnostі [Economics and organization of innovative activity]. Kharkiv: NTU «KhPI» [in Ukrainian]. 
14. Pererva, P.G., & Gladenko, I.V. (2010). Monitorynh innovatsiinoi diialnosti: interpretatsiia rezultativ [Monitoring of innovative activity: interpretation of results]. Marketynh і menedzhment іnnovatsіi – Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 108-116 [in Ukrainian].
15. Pererva, P.G. (2010) Antykryzovyi monіtorynh fіnansovo-ekonomіchnykh pokaznykіv roboty mashynobudіvnoho pіdpriemstva [Anti-crisis monitoring of financial and economic indicators of engineering enterprise activity]. Ekonomіka rozvytku – Economics of development, 2, 46-50 [in Ukrainian].
16. Pererva, P.G., Kosenko, O.P., & Kosenko, A.V. (2012). Antykryzovі іnstrumenty staloho rozvytku pіdpriemstva: іnnovatsіina, іnvestytsіina ta marketynhova polіtyka [Crisis management tools for the sustainable enterprise development: innovation, investment and marketing policy]. www.nbuv.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/natural/vcpi/TPtEV/2012_25/ statti/16Pererv.pdf [in Ukrainian].
17. Pererva, P.G., & Zhegus, O.V. (2011). Naukovo-іnnovatsіinyi potentsіal Ukrainy ta suchasnі problemy yoho vykorystannia [Research and innovation potential of Ukraine and its use]. www.arhive.nbuv.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://archive.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/Natural/vcpi/TPtEV/ 2011_26/statiya/Pererva.pdf [in Ukrainian].
18. Pererva, P.H., & Kocziszky, G. (2012). Transfer tekhnolohіi [Technology transfer]. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
19. Pererva, P.G., & Tkachova, N.P. (2011). Rozvytok metodіv analіzu faktychnoho stanu konkurentnykh perevah pіdpryiemstva [Development of methods for the analysis of the actual state of the enterprises competitive advantages]. Ekonomіka rozvytku – Economics of development, 4, 116-120 [in Ukrainian].  
20. Poliakova, Yu.V. (2013). Patentna aktyvnіst: zahalnosvіtovі tendentsіi ta pozytsіi Ukrainy [Patent activity: global trends and the position of Ukraine]. Vіsnyk Odeskoho Natsіonalnoho unіversitetu – Bulletin of the Odessa National University, 19(2), 152-155 [in Ukrainian].
21. Smirnova, E.S. (2013). Izobretatelskaia aktivnost: sushchnost, pokazateli [Inventive activity: essence, indicators]. Vіsnik Natsіonalnoho unіversytetu «Yurydychna akademіia Ukrainy іmenі Yaroslava Mudroho». Serіia: Ekonomіchna teorіia ta pravo – Bulletin of National University 2Law Academy of Ukraine named after Yaroslav the Wise». Series: Economic theory and law 2, 328-330. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/j-pdf/Vnyua_etp_2013_2_56.pdf [in Russian].
22. Strelkov, O.I. (2010). Rossiiskii indeks izobretatelskoi aktivnosti [The Russian index of inventive activity]. Akkreditatsiia v obrazovanii – Accreditation in education, 9 (44), 16-19. Retrieved from http://www.akvobr.ru [in Russian].
23. SJR: SCImago Journal Rankings. (n.d.) www.scimagojr.com. Retrieved from http://www.scimagojr.com/index.php [in English].