Abstract

The aim of the article. The aim of the article is to define and propose the directions to solve the recent problems of financing public ecological services in the conditions of fiscal decentralization. The results of the analysis. This paper analyzes the decentralization reform impact on the possibilities of local authorities to finance the public ecological services in Ukraine. Advantages and threats of decentralizing reform are defined on the basis of theoretical vision of fiscal federalism in different state structures. The authors assessed basic central government documents in which the strategy and tactic of development. The lack of particular measures that are directed to the sustainable nature use on state level is defined. In practice, this means transference of financing powers from central to local government. Such process needs to be conducted with respective changes of financial flows directions and establishing effective forming and distributive tools. Traditionally, one of such tools, which are most appropriate to accumulate public environmental funds, is ecological tax. The study revealed that the enhancement of general fund of local budget revenues by local tax make the Local Environmental foundations’ work impossible. Another initiative of central government is to transfer more than half revenues from the tax to the regional level. Such decision will be practicable only if impartial, formula based mechanism of subsequent allocation of funds between basic local authorities is developed. Scale projects now are funded by regional authorities. Authors proved that the better way to finance public ecological services on complementary basis is the local authorities’ cooperation. One of the advantages of such cooperation is the considering of the opportunities of self-taxation. This voluntary fiscal tool in Ukrainian European future must be stable source for financing of public ecological services. Decentralization reform also provides for the official consolidation of local authorities which meets lots of resistance from communities. To overcome obstacles and make it really voluntary there are propositions to account natural marks and distributive criteria basing on ecosystem approach. The analysis of financial autonomy of local budgets shows that the prior part of local public revenues continues to form by intergovernmental fiscal transfers. For the purpose to provide sustainable development of communities authors propose to include ecological components into the system of budget equalization and compensation. This paper proves the inadequacy of horizontal equalization procedures for management of the system of general territorial nature use. The main reason for it is the inferior fiscal potential of the state environment tax and payments fixed attached to the local budgets. On the contrary, establishment of the ecological subsidies to the budget management allows to finance the local projects of expanded reproduction of territory and its ecological infrastructure. To resolve this problem authors propose to assess the quantity of ecological subsidy basing on the next parameters: the amount of population of rated community (political unit); the financial standard of budgetary provision of ecological services, compensate coefficients. The compensate coefficients must be individual to particular territory and take into account the ecological degradation pace, the efficiency and experience of ecological public program implementation, the tendency of degradation of independent nature components that is in keeping with existent levels of man’s impact, the particularity of ecological service provisioning in exclusion zone. Conclusions and directions of further researches. To summarize, reform of fiscal decentralization in Ukraine is really needed and has opportunities. But it needs prudence and accurate economic ground. Cooperation and consolidation of communities on the basis of common interests and needs of sustainable development lead to improve the Ukrainians’ life quality and to increase the efficiency of public services provision. The applications of vertical fiscal compensation procedure allows to equivalence allocate budget revenues and ecological expenditures. But the methodology of ecological self-taxation, assessment and distribution of subsidies need further researches.

Keywords: public ecological service, fiscal decentralization, reform, tax, ecological fiscal transfer, ecosystem, complementarity

JEL Classification: H23, H77, Q58.

Cite as: Kotenko N. & Illyashenko, T. (2015). Fiscal decentralization and the challenges of public ecological services delivery. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 267-278. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2015.2-23

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Byudzhetnyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 08.07.2010 №2456-VI. [The Budget Code of Ukraine]. (2010). http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2456-17 [in Ukrainian].
2. Podatkovyi kodeks Ukrayiny vid 02.12.2010 №2755-VI [The Tax Code of Ukraine]. (2010). http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/податковий%20кодек [in Ukrainian].
3. Zakon Ukrayiny «Pro spivrobitnytstvo terytorialnykh hromad» [The Law of Ukraine «On the Cooperation of Local Authorities]. (n.d.). http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1508-18#n23 [in Ukrainian].
4. Postanova Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny «Pro Prohramu diialnosti Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrayiny» [Resolution of the Supreme Council of Ukraine «On the the Action Program of the Cabinet of Ministers]. (n.d.). http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/26-19#n7 [in Ukrainian].
5. Metodyka formuvannia spromozhnykh terytorialnykh hromad. zatverdzhena postanovoiu Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrayiny vid 8 kvitnya 2015 r. №214 [The Method of Formation for Competent Local Authorities. Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine of April 8, 2014 №214]. (2014). http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/214-2015-%D0%BF/paran10#n10 [in Ukrainian].
6. Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrayiny «Pro Stratehiiu staloho rozvytku «Ukrayina-2020»» [Resolution of the President of Ukraine «On the Strategy of Sustainable Development «Ukraine-2020»]. (n.d.). http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/5/2015 [in Ukrainian]
7. Berezhna, A.Yu., & Miroshnychenko, O.V. (2012). Stabilizatsiia mistsevykh byudzhetiv yak vazhil zabezpechennia finansovoi bezpeky derzhavy [Local budget stabilization as lever to ensure the financial security of the state]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Natsionalnoho universytetu derzhavnoi podatkovoi sluzhby Ukrayiny – Collection of scientific papers of the National State Tax Service University of Ukraine, 2, 6-24 [in Ukrainian].
8. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrayiny. Ofitsiynyi sayt [State statistics service of Ukraine]. (n.d.). http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ [in Ukrainian]
9. Zaproponovani oblastiamy proekty perspektyvnykh planiv formuvannia spromozhnykh hromad v tsilomu vidpovidaiut stratehii. Detsentralizatsiia vlady [The projects of perspective plans of forming capable authorities which was proposed by regions in general correspond to strategy. Decentralization of power]. (n.d.). decentralization.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://decentralization.gov.ua/news/item?id=346 [in Ukrainian].
10. Instytut biudzhetu ta sotsialno-ekonomichnykh doslidzhen. Ofitsiinyi sayt [The institution of budget, social and economic researches]. (n.d.). www.ibser.org.ua. Retrieved from http://www.ibser.org.ua [in Ukrainian].
11. Informatsiia shchodo stanu vykonannia dokhodiv mistsevykh biudzhetiv za sichen-kviten 2015 roku. Ofitsiinyi sait ministerstva finansiv Ukrainy [Information on the the status of implementation of local budget revenues in January-April 2015. Official site of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine]. (2015). http://www.minfin.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://www.minfin.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/ archive/main?cat_id=292741 [in Ukrainian].
12. Kontseptsiia reformuvannia mistsevoho samovriaduvannia ta terytorialnoi orhanizatsii vlady v Ukraini. Skhvalena rozporiadzhenniam Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrayiny vid 1 kvitnia 2014 r. №333-r [Concept of reformation of local authority and territorial organization of power in Ukraine. Approved by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine of April 1, 2014 №333-r]. (2014). http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/333-2014-%D1%80 [in Ukrainian].
13. Kravchenko, V.I. (1999). Mistsevi finansy Ukrayiny [Local finance of Ukraine]. Kyiv: Znannia [in Ukrainian].
14. Ministerstvo ekolohii ta pryrodnykh resursiv Ukrainy. Ofitsiinyi sait [Ministry of Ecology and Natural resources]. (n.d.). http://www.menr.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://www.menr.gov.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
15. Kyrylenko, O.P. (Eds.). (2006). Mistsevi finansy [Local finance]. Kyiv: Znannia [in Ukrainian]. 
16. Nikitin, V.V. (2009) Biudzhetnyi federalizm yak chynnyk formuvannia hromadianskoho suspilstva [Budget federalism as a cause to formation of civil society]. Derzhavne budivnytstvo – State building. Retrieved from http://www.kbuapa.kharkov.ua/e-book/db/2009-1/doc/4/04.pdf [in Ukrainian].
17. Plan vidnovlennia Ukrainy. Stratehichnyi dokument. 2015-2017. Robocha versiia [The plan of renovation of Ukraine. 2015-2017. Working version]. http://reforms.in.ua. Retrieved from http://reforms.in.ua/Content/download/Strategic_doc_final%202015-2017.pdf [in Ukrainian].
18. Slukhai, S.V. (2013). Instytutsiini peredumovy rozvytku ukrainskoi ekonomiky pid kutom zoru teorii fiskalnoho federalizmu druhoi heneratsii [Institutional preconditions for the development of the Ukrainian economy from the perspective of the theory of fiscal federalism second generation]. Finansy Ukrainy – The Finance of Ukraine, 5, 50-57 [in Ukrainian].
19. Sumy. Munitsypalnyi informatsinyi portal. Ofitsiinyi sait Vykonavchoho komitetu Sumskoi miskoi rady [Sumy. Municipal Informative Portal. Official site of executive committee of Sumy’s Local Council]. http://meria.sumy.ua. Retrieved from http://meria.sumy.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
20. Kostel, M.V., Abramchuk, M.Yu., & Kotenko, N.V. (etc.) (2012). Finansovi mekhanizmy upravlinnia pryrodokorystuvanniam [Financial mechanism of environmental management]. Sumy: SumSU [in Ukrainian].
21. European Charter of Local Self-Government. (n.d.). http://conventions.coe.int. Retrieved from http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/122.htm [in .English]
22. Human Development Report 2014. Sustaining Human Progress: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Building Resilience. (2014). http://hdr.undp.org. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr14-report-en-1.pdf [in English].