Abstract

The aim of the article. The study aims to add the scientific and managerial knowledge about the fit between buyer and salesperson, by analyzing judgments of buyers about salespeople, based just on visual information. The results of the analysis. Buyers evaluate credibility of salespeople based on a relatively large number of their characteristics, forming factors of salesperson credibility. The result of this evaluation predetermines whether an advice of this person is to be considered, and, subsequently, whether the purchase will be made. The decision whether to ask for an assistance of a salesperson is often made spontaneously, based just on a visual presence of a salesperson. The stereotyping of visual impressions can be limited to the age and genders of a salesperson, and out of these characteristics potential buyers derive believes about personal and professional characteristics of a salesperson, and develop overall judgments regarding the trustfulness of the recommendations. In the study, three research questions have been analyzed: RQ1: How evaluations of salesperson credibility differ, depending on his/her age and gender?; RQ2: What dimensions of salesperson credibility have influenced higher or lower judgments about the overall credibility of salespeople who have different demographic characteristics?; RQ3: How evaluations of credibility of salespeople, who differ in age and gender, vary depending on the age and gender of buyers? Respondents have been shown four pre-tested pictures of salespeople, who differ among themselves in terms of their age and gender. The age categories matched to those of the respondents; two salespeople (male and female) represented younger adults, two others – elder adults. The research instrument measured eight dimensions of salesperson credibility: Attractiveness, Experience, Dynamism, Comprehensiveness, Objectiveness, Sincerity, Expertise, and Accommodation on a seven point Likert scale. RQ1. Repeated measures ANOVA with a Greenhouse-Geisser correction determined that perception of credibility was different. Post hoc tests using the Bonferroni correction revealed that the younger male salesperson was evaluated better than other salespeople. RQ2. Repeated measures ANOVA with a Greenhouse-Geisser correction used to find differences of characteristics among the four salespeople. Surprisingly, the younger male has been perceived as the best expert among the four; post hoc tests using the Bonferroni correction showed his evaluation being significantly higher than of the others. The younger male together with the elder female were superior on evaluation of the experience and sincerity; the evaluation of younger male salesperson has been evaluated the best on the dimension of dynamism. RQ3. Analysis performed with factorial ANOVA for each type (age/gender combination) of a salesperson. Elder female salesperson. The difference was found on Gender, Age and Age*Gender interaction. Female respondents evaluated this salesperson as more credible than male; younger respondents were more positive than elder respondents. The interaction showed that 38-57 male respondents evaluated credibility of this salesperson less positively, than all others. Younger female salesperson. Statistically significant difference occurred as the effect of Age and Age*Gender interaction. The elder group of respondents evaluated this salesperson as more credible than younger respondents. Male respondents evaluated credibility lower than female respondents. Younger male salesperson. The statistical difference was found for the main effect of the Age and Age*Gender interaction. The elder respondents evaluated this salesperson as more credible than younger ones. Interaction analysis disclosed that younger male respondents were skeptical about credibility of this salesperson than females. Elder male salesperson. The difference has occurred just for the main effect of the Age; we only observed that the elder respondents (38-57) evaluated this salesperson as more credible than the younger respondents. Conclusions and directions of further researches. The study helped researching the dyadic fit between buyers and salespeople, based on their age and gender, in regard of evaluation of salesperson credibility. Some findings go into the contradiction with the knowledge about the buyer-seller similarity, and even with the similarity-attraction paradigm.  

Keywords: salesperson, credibility, retailing, age, gender, Lithuania

JEL Classification: M31, M39, L81.

Cite as: Urbonavicius, S., Dikcius V. & Reardon, J. (2016). Credibility of a salesperson in retailing: judgments on the basis of their demographic parameters. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2016.2-05

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Busch, P., & Wilson, D.T. (1976). An Experimental Analysis of a Salesman’s Expert and Referent Bases of Social Power in the Buyer-Seller Dyad. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 8, 3-11 [in English].
2. Eisend, M. (2006). Source Credibility Dimensions in Marketing Communication – A Generalized Solution, Journal of Empirical Generalisations in Marketing Science, Vol 10, No.2, 1-33 [in English].
3. Babin, B.J., Boles, J.S., & Darden, W.R. (1995). Salesperson stereotypes, consumer emotions, and their impact on information processing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(2), 94-105 [in English].
4. Kidwell, B., & Hasford, J. (2014). Emotional Ability and Nonverbal Communication. Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 31 Issue 7, 526-538 [in English].
5. Wood, J. A., Boles, J.s., Johnston, W., & Bellenger, D. (2008). Buyers’ Trust of the Salesperson: An Item-Level Meta-Analysis. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Vol. 28, Issue 3, 263-283 [in English]. 
6. Ma, Y.J., & Niehm, L.S. (2006). Service expectations of older generation Y customers: An examination of apparel retail settings. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 16 Issue 6, 620-640 [in English].
7. Johnson‐Hillery, J., Kang, J., & Tuan, W‐J. (1997). The difference between elderly consumers’ satisfaction levels and retail sales personnel’s perceptions, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 25 Iss: 4, 126 -137 [in English].
8. Dwyer, S., Richard, O., & Shepherd, C.D. (1998). An Exploratory Study of Gender and Age Matching in the Salesperson-Prospective Customer Dyad: Testing Similarity-Performance Predictions. The Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, Vol. 18, No. 4, Special Issue on Diversity in the Sales Force, 55-69 [in English].
9. Guenzi, P., & Georges, L. (2010). Interpersonal trust in commercial relationships: Antecedents and consequences of customer trust in the salesperson. European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 44 Issue 1/2, 114-138 [in English].
10. Sharma, A. (1991). The Persuasive Effect of Salesperson Credibility: Conceptual and Empirical Examination. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Vol. 10 Issue 4, 71 [in English].
11. Hovland, C.I., & Weiss, W, (1951). The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(1), 635-650 [in English].
12. Hawes, J.M., & Rao, C.P. (1993). Retail Salesperson Attributes and the Role of Dependability in the Selection of Durable Goods. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Vol. 13 Issue 4, 61-71 [in English].
13. Arndt, A., Evans, K., Landry, T.D., Mady, S., & Pongpatipat, C. (2014). The impact of salesperson credibility-building statements on later stages of the sales encounter. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Vol. 34, No. 1, 19-32 [in English].
14. Main, K.J., Dahl, D.W., & Darke, P.R. (2007). Deliberative and automatic bases of suspicion: empirical evidence of the sinister attribution error. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(1), 59-69 [in English]. 
15. Guo, W., Main, K. (2011). The Fundamental Attribution Error in Salespeople and Its Correction By Stealing Thunder: Evidence From Agents and Consumers. Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 38. (Eds. Darren W. Dahl, Gita V. Johar, and Stijn M.J. van Osselaer). Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research, 792-793 [in English]. 
16. Cronin, J.J. (1994). Analysis of the buyer-seller dyad: The social relations model. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 14, 69-77 [in English].
17. Smith, J.B. (1998). Buyer-Seller Relationships: Similarity, Relationship Managements, and Quality. Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 15 Issue 1, 3-21 [in English].
18. Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94(3), 369-389 [in English].
19. McColl, R., & Truong, Y. (2013). The effects of facial attractiveness and gender on customer evaluations during a web-video sales encounter. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 31, 117-128 [in English].
20. Rink, D.R. (2015). A theoretical extension of Toman’s sibling position and gender model to industrial selling. Innovative Marketing, Vol. 11, Issue 1, 42-54 [in English].
21. Palan, K.M., & Mallalieu, L. (2012) A troubled relationship: an exploration of mall retailers and teen shoppers’ thoughts, behaviors, and coping strategies as they interact with each other. Young Consumers, Vol. 13 Issue 3, 242-254 [in English].