Abstract

The aim of this article. The article is devoted to the main aspects of technological security providing through increasing the efficiency of innovation development priorities selection. The features of impact of technological security for national security and international experience of its software were analyzed. The scheme of determination of innovation priorities, based on the assessment of critical technologies and strategy of socio-economic development, were proposed. The scheme of innovation priorities based on “deployment policy” concept was developed. The results of the analysis. Based on analysis of possibilities of using the capacity of international environment, eliminating the technological gap between Ukraine and leading countries in framework of technological security provision should be implemented not by increasing the one-side transfer of foreign technologies, but with the improvement and development of national critical technologies based on foreign experience. Also positive balance of international technology transfer in future can’t be achieved the growth of dumping policy with the expansion of volumes of these technologies only when the country has to spend a resources, which is beneficial only for foreign partners. This balance should be focused on system-level processes, it is necessary to speed up the development of its own technology base, that can eliminate existing or possible “technological blockade”. Conclusions and perspectives for further research. The state’s ability to engage in complicated tech activities is a characteristic of scientific, technical and technological level of its development as well as has great impact on economic situation and national security and assists enhance its international prestige. However, the development of such industries and requires the creation of efficient innovation system and international cooperation mechanisms to compensate for negative effects of unilateral scientific and technological development based on priorities, that reflect the existing potential and strategy goals. In further researches it is necessary to develop methodological approaches to address specific issues, related to objectives of uncertainty and appropriate criteria of innovation priorities selection, in particular to solve such problems of optimization: 1.The problem of normalization of criteria of priorities selection, that is to bring selection criteria to common (dimensionless) measurement scale. 2.The problem of choice of optimality principle, that is to establish in what way an optimal set of priorities is better than other solutions. 3.The problem of accounting criteria priorities. 4.The problem of calculating the optimum of tasks, based on combination of linear, nonlinear, discrete optimization methods etc. for optimum calculation.

Keywords: technological security, national security, innovation priority, technology, strategy

JEL Classification: C51, O14, O32.

Cite as: Omelyanenko, V. (2016). Innovation priorities optimization in the context of national technological security ensuring. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 226-234. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2016.4-19

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Brown, H. (1983). Thinking about national security: defense and foreign policy in a dangerous world. As quoted in Watson, Cynthia Ann (2008). U.S. National Security: A Reference Handbook. Contemporary world issues. ABC-CLIO [in English].
2. Carayannis, E., & Grigoroudis, E. (2016). Quadruple Innovation Helix and Smart Specialization: Knowledge Production and National Competitiveness. Foresight and STI Governance, Vol. 10, 1, 31-42 [in English].
3. Glennie, A., & Bound, K. (2016). How innovation agencies work: International lessons to inspire and inform national strategies. London: NESTA. www.nesta.org.uk. Retrieved from https://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/how_innovation_agencies_work.pdf [in English].
4. Innovation and Growth. Rationale for an Innovation Strategy. OECD. (2007). oecd.org. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/science/inno/39374789.pdf [in English].
5. Krapyvny, I.V., Omelyanenko, V.A., Vernydub, N.O. (2015). International innovation networks as new stage of innovation development. Economic Processes Management, 1. Retrieved from http://epm.fem.sumdu.edu.ua/download/2015_1/2015_1_17.pdf [in English].
6. National Research Prioritisation Exercise: First Progress Report. (2014). NRPE [in English].
7. Omelyanenko, V.A. (2014). Analysis of Potential of International Inter-Cluster Cooperation in High-Tech Industries. International Journal of Econometrics and Financial Management, Vol. 2, 4, 141-147 [in English].
8. The Global Innovation Index 2015: Effective Innovation Policies for Development. (2015). Cornell University, INSEAD and WIPO Fontainebleau, Ithaca, and Geneva [in English].
9. Omelyanenko, V.A., & Prokopenko, O.V. (2013). Mizhnarodniy faktor zabezpechennia tehnologichnoi bezpeki derzhavi [International factor of state technological security]. Ekonomichna bezpeka derzhavy: mizhdyscyplinarny pidhid – Economic security of the state: an interdisciplinary approach. (pp. 89–98). Cherkasy [in Ukrainian].
10. Omelyanenko, V.A. (2015). Mizhnarodnyi aspekt zabezpechennia ekonomichnoi bezpeky kosmichnoi galuzi [The international aspect of economic security of space industry]. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical E-Conference. Investytsiino-innovatsiina skladova finansovo-ekonomichnoi bezpeky na nacionalnomu, regionalnomu ta mikrorivni v konteksti stalogo rozvytku – Investment and innovation component of economic and financial security at national, regional and micro level in the context of sustainable development. Kyiv: KNUTD. Retrieved from http://knutd.com.ua/ourpublikation/533/683/6927/ [in Ukrainian].