Abstract

The aim of the article.  Investment in stock market requires taking risk. Investors typically buy several stocks to create a portfolio which targets to maximize the return while keeping a certain level of risk. In today’s information-rich financial markets, one of the main challenges for individual investors in particular is to allocate the scarce sources appropriately within the wide range of investment alternatives that grouping the multiple assets based on their similar characteristics would be useful to take it out. In this paper, stock markets of the Group of 7 (G-7) countries consisting of France, United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, United States, Canada and Japan are examined over the period of 2011 and 2016 and some hierarchical clustering methods are applied on key indices namely, CAC 40 (France), FTSE 100 (UK), DAX (Germany), FTSE MIB (Italy), S&P TSX Composite (Canada), S&P 500 (USA), NIKKEI 225 (Japan) to identify the groups based on risk and return characteristics. The results of the analysis. Cluster analysis is an innovative and a very useful method to help make sense of data. In this paper, we investigated the Group of 7’s stock markets over the period of 2011 and 2016. The single linkage, complete linkage, average linkage, centroid and Ward’s hierarchical clustering methods are performed on widely followed stock market indices namely, CAC 40 (France), FTSE 100 (UK), DAX (Germany), FTSE MIB (Italy), S&P TSX Composite (Canada), S&P 500 (USA), NIKKEI 225 (Japan) to identify the groups based on risk and return characteristics. Conclusions and directions of further researches. Although, the differences exist at some stages, the all performed dendrograms, in this study, demonstrated that CAC 40 is merged with DAX whereas S&P 500 is merged with S&P/TSK Composite at the first stages. At the last stage, NIKKEI 225 is merged with the group of CAC 40, DAX, FTSE 100, S&P 500, S&P/TSK Composite and FTSE MIB for the studied period. Additionally, the k-means clustering is performed on means and standard deviations of daily returns. The analysis showed that CAC 40, DAX and NIKKEI 225 form a group; FTSE 100, S&P 500 and S&P TSK Composite form another group, and finally FTSE MIB itself form a group during the examined period. When twostep clustering is performed for k=3, CAC 40 and FTSE MIB form one group; DAX, NIKKEI 225 and S&P 500 form another group, and FTSE 100 and S&P TSK Composite form the third group for the related period. Results partly showed similarity by the study of [8] since the dendrograms which was obtained through the average linkage method. 

Keywords: G-7 countries, hierarchical clustering, k-means, twostep clustering, stock market, innovative approach

JEL Classification: C10, F33, O31.

Cite as: Peker, S., Aktan B. & Tvaronavičienė, M. (2017). Clustering in key G-7 stock market indices: an innovative approach. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 300-310. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2017.1-27

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Aktan, B. (2013). An Empirical Examination of Clustering at Bahrain Bourse. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 110, 149-154 [in English].
2. Azzalini, A., & Scarpa, B. (2012). Data Analysis and Data Mining: An Introduction, Oxford University Press, USA [in English].
3. Basalto, N., Bellotti, R., De Carlo, F., Facchi, P., & Pascazio, S. (2005). Clustering stock market companies via chaotic map synchronization, Physica A, 345, 196-206 [in English].
4. Bikas, E., & Bikas, E. (2016). Towards sustainable financial markets: impact of structured securities on portfolio management, Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 6(2), 275-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2016.6.2(7) [in English].
5. Čábelková, I., Strielkowski, W., & Mirvald, M. (2015). Business influence on the mass media: a case study of 21 countries. Transformations in Business & Economics, 14(1), 65-75 [in English].
6. Chiabai, A., Platt, S., & Strielkowski, W. (2014). Eliciting users’ preferences for cultural heritage and tourism-related e-services: a tale of three European cities. Tourism Economics, 20(2), 263-277.  http://dx.doi.org/10.5367/te.2013.0290 [in English].  
7. Demainea, E.D., Emanuel, D., Fiat, A., & Immorlica, A. (2006). Correlation clustering in general weighted graphs, Theoretical Computer Science, 361, 172-87 [in English].
8. Esmalifalak, H., Ajirloub, A.I., Behrouz, S.P., & Esmalifalak, M. (2015). (Dis)integration levels across global stock markets: A multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 8393-8402 [in English].  
9. Fuschi, D.L., & Tvaronavičienė, M. (2016). A network based business partnership model for SMEs management, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 3(3), 282-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2016.3.3(5) [in English].
10. Gan, G., Ma, C., & Wu, J. (2007). Data Clustering: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications, SIAM, Philadelphia [in English].
11. Google Finance. (2016). www.google.com. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/finance [in English].
12. Han, J., & Kamber, M. (2001). Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, Morgan Kaufmann [in English].
13. Ignatavičius, R., Tvaronavičienė, M., & Piccinetti, L. (2015). Sustainable development through technology transfer networks: case of Lithuania. Journal of Security and Sustainability, 4(3), 261-267. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2015.4.3(6) [in English].
14. Ingram, M., & Margetis, S. (2010). A practical method to cost of equity capital for a firm using cluster analysis. Managerial Finance, 36 (2), 160-67 [in English].
15. Janda, K., Rausser, G., & Strielkowski, W. (2014). Determinants of Profitability of Polish Rural Micro-Enterprises at the Time of EU Accession. Eastern European Countryside, 19, 177-217. https://doi.org/10.2478/eec-2013-0009 [in English].
16. Jurevičienė, D., & Skvarciany, V. (2016). Camels+t approach for banks’ assessment: evidence from the Baltics. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4(2), 159-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2016.4.2(4) [in English].
17. Kaźmierczyk, J., & Aptacy, M. (2016). The management by objectives in banks: the Polish case. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4(2), 146-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2016.4.2(3) [in English].
18. Kulišauskas, D., & Galinienė, B. (2015). Stock evaluation methods and their applicability in Lithuania ensuring sustainable capital market development. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 5(1), 73-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2015.5.1(6) [in English].
19. Lahmiri, S. (2016). Clustering of Casablanca stock market based on hurst exponent estimates. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 456, 310-318 [in English].
20. Larose, D.T. (2005). Discovering Knowledge in Data: An introduction to Data Mining, Wiley [in English].
21. Lawal, T. (2016). Clustering of annual general meetings and stock returns: UK evidence, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 11, 9-12 [in English].
22. Li, H., Mao, L.L., Zhang, J.J., & Xu, J. (2015). Classifying and profiling sports lottery gamblers: A cluster analysis approach. Social Behavior and Personality, 43 (8), 1299-1318 [in English].
23. Lim, K.P., & Hooy, C.W. (2003). Non- Linear Predictability in G7 Stock Index Returns. The Manchester School, 81 (4), 620-637 [in English].
24. Lisin, E., & Strielkowski, W. (2014). Modelling new economic approaches for the wholesale energy markets in Russia and the EU. Transformations in Business & Economics, 13(2B), 566-580 [in English].
25. Musmeci, N., Aste, T., & Di Matteo T. (2015). Relation between Financial Market Structure and the Real Economy: Comparison between Clustering Methods. PLoS ONE 10 (3), 1-24 [in English].
26. Nanda, S.R., Mahanty, B., & Tiwari M.K. (2010). Clustering Indian stock market data for portfolio management. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 8793-8798 [in English].
27. Nandi, A.K., Abu-Jamous B., & Fa R. (2015). Integrative Cluster Analysis in Bioinformatics. John and Wiley Sons, India [in English].
28. Pattarin, F., Paterlini, S., & Tommaso, M. (2004). Clustering financial time series: An application to mutual funds style analysis. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 47, 353-72 [in English].
29. Reddy, C.K., & Vinzamuri B. (2014). Data Clustering: Algorithms and Applications, Chapter 4, edited by Charu C. Aggarwal, Chandan K. Reddy, CRC Press, Boca Raton [in English].
30. Saunders, J. (1994). Cluster Analysis. Journal of Marketing Management, 10, 13-28 [in English].
31. Sharma, S. (1996). Applied Multivariate Techniques, Wiley [in English].
32. Strielkowski, W., & Weyskrabova, B. (2014). Ukrainian labour migration and remittances in the Czech Republic. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 105(1), 30-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12052 [in English].
33. Tvaronaviciene, M., Razminiene, K., & Piccinetti, L. (2015). Approaches towards cluster analysis, Economics and Sociology, 8 (1), 19-27 [in English].
34. Tvaronavičienė, M., & Černevičiūtė, J. (2015). Technology transfer phenomenon and its impact on sustainable development, Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 5(1), 87–97. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2015.5.1(7) [in English].
35. Tvaronavičienė, M., Razminienė, K., & Piccinetti, L. (2015). Cluster efficiency study through benchmarking. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 3(2), 120-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2015.3.2(0) [in English].
36. Tyron, R. (1939). Cluster Analysis, McGraw Hill, New York [in English].
37. Yahoo finance. (2016). finance.yahoo.com. Retrieved from https://finance.yahoo.com [in English].
38. Zhou, Z.H. (2012). Ensemble Methods: Foundations and Algorithms, CRC Press, Boca Raton [in English].