Abstract

The aim of the article. Evaluation quality management processes of creating innovative values at domestic enterprises and their comparison with the worldwide trends to determine transdisciplinary conceptual directions of innovative activity development. The results of the analysis. The article carried an overview of the development of an innovative component of Ukraine at the international and macro level, the analysis of which is designated a number of trends in the national innovation system, contrary to the logic of global development of innovative infrastructure and human capital, as well as the recommendations of international experts in the field of innovation. The assessment of the quality management processes of creating innovative value at the enterprises of machine-building and metallurgical industries is carried out, resulting in identified key trends in the development aksiogenesis on the main functional areas, which made it possible to systematize and compare them with transdisciplinary trends in the transformation of innovative processes at the forefront of foreign enterprises, and to formulate the conceptual directions of their development and offer a number of social humanitarian technologies focused on the evolutionary transition of domestic of business entities on a non-linear paradigm of innovation development. Conclusions and directions of further researches. Further development of the theory and practice of management processes of value creation requires the development of relevant theoretical and practical imperatives of taking the complexity of postmodern society and the consumer in this society. Transformation of consumer interpretation leads to the devaluation of the traditional models aksiogenesis based on the rationality of the subject of consumption, linear and normative paradigms. Improving the quality management process of value creation and overcoming the contradictions between the theory and practice of innovation of domestic enterprises, possibly through the elimination of the traditional position of an external observer, through the inactivation of a business entity in the market flow of increasing complexity. Further research is necessary to form scientific and practical base of the inactivation of business entity in the market flow, which involves the development of a methodology aksiogenesis, which is based on transdisciplinary approach, nonlinear and behavioral paradigms of innovative development models postnonclassical rationality, positions of society sustainable development, epistemic conceptualisation object values.

Keywords: aksiogenesis, innovation, quality, collaboration, management, value

JEL Classification: D46, L20, М11, О32.

Cite as: Bezgin K. & Kulga, A. (2017). Diagnostics trends of management processes of the innovative value for enterprises. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 94-114. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2017.1-09

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Akatov, N.B. (2012). Upravlenie perehodom k samorazvivaychimsy innovatsionnim orhanizatsiiam: teoriia i praktika [Managing the transition to self-developing innovative organizations: theory and practice]. Perm: PNIPU [in Russian].
2. Bodriiar, J. (2006). Obschestvo potrebleniia. Eho mify i realnost [Consumer society. His myths and structures]. Moscow: Respublika [in Russian].
3. Bragin, I.V. & Korolkov, V.F. (2003). Put QFD: proektirovaniie i proizvodstvo produktsii ishodia iz ozhidanii potrebitelei [Way QFD: design and manufacture of products based on customer expectations]. Yaroslavl: ID «Tsentr kachestva» [in Russian].
4. Haiselhard, H. (2004). Obuchaischeesi predpriiatie v XXI veke [Learning Enterprise in the XXI century]. Kaluga: Duhovnoe nasledie [in Russian].
5. Hlichev, A.V. (2009). Kachestvo, effektivnost, nravstvenost [Quality, efficiency, morality]. Moscow: Premium inzhiniring [in Russian].
6. Deming, E. (2007). Vyhod iz krizisa: novai paradihma upravleniia lydmi, sistemami, protsessami [Overcoming the crisis: A new paradigm of managing people, systems and processes]. Moscow: Alpina Biznes Buks [in Russian].
7. Dzhordzh, S. (2002). Vseobscheie upravleniie kachestvom (TQM) [Total Quality Management (TQM)]. St. Petersburg: Viktoriia plius [in Russian].
8. Druker, P. (1998). Effektivnoie upravleniie. Ekonomicheskiie zadachi i optimalnyie resheniia [Effective management. Economic problems and optimal decisions]. Moscow: FAIR-PRESS [in Russian].
9. Druker, P. (2001). Zadachi menedzhmenta ХХI veka [Management Objectives of the XXI century]. Moscow: Viliiams [in Russian].
10. Kotler, Ph., & Trias de Bes, F. (2010). Lateralnyi marketinh: tehnolohiia poiska revoliutsionnykh idei veka [Lateral marketing: search technology revolutionary ideas]. Moscow: Alpina Pablisherz [in Russian].
11. Lepskii, V. (2010). Lateralnyi marketinh: tehnolohiia poiska revoliutsionnykh idei veka [Reflective-active environment of innovation development]. Moscow: Kohito-Tsentr [in Russian].
12. Lidbiter, Ch. (2009). My – dumaiem: Massovyie innovatsii, ne massovoie proizvodstvo [We think: Mass innovation, not mass production]. Moscow: Akvamarinovaia kniha [in Russian].
13. Meskon, M., Albert, M., & Xedouri, F. (1992). Osnovy menedzhmenta [Management]. Moscow: Delo [in Russian].
14. Nordstrem, K., & Ridderstrale, J. (2008). Biznes v stile fank: kapital pliashet pod dudku talanta [Funky Business: Capital dancing to the tune of talent]. St. Petersburg: Stokholmskaia shkola ekonomiki [in Russian]. 
15. Polani, M. (1985). Lichnostnoe znanie [Personal knowledge]. Moscow: Progress [in Russian].
16. Richnyi tehnichnyi zvit z informatsijnoi diialnosti u sferi promyslovyh zrazkiv [Annual technical report with information activities in the field of industrial designs]. sips.gov.ua. Retrieved from http ://sips.gov.ua/ua/plans_reports.html [in Ukrainian].
17. Statystychnyi biulleten. Vykorystannia informatsiino-komunikatsiinykh tehnolohii na pidpryiemstvakh Ukrainy [Statistical Bulletin. The use information and communication technologies at enterprises of Ukraine]. Kyiv: Derzhkomstat, 2013 [in Ukrainian].
18. Statystychnyi bjulleten. Nauka, tehnolohii ta innovatsii [Statistical Bulletin. Science, technology and innovation]. Kyiv: Derzhkomstat, 2016 [in Ukrainian].
19. Toffler, Je. (2004). Tretia volna [Third Wave]. Moscow: ACT [in Russian].
20. Tuominen, K. (2008). Kachestvo upravleniia izmeneniiami [The quality of the change management]. Moscow: RIA «Standarty i kachestvo» [in Russian].
21. Harrington, D. (2008). Sovershenstvo upravleniia izmeneniiami [Change Management Excellence]. Moscow: RIA «Standarty i kachestvo» [in Russian].
22. Hau, Dzh. (2012). Kraudsorsing: Kollektivnyi razum kak instrument razvitiia biznesa [Crowdsourcing: Collective Intelligence as a business development tool]. Moscow: Alpina Pablisherz [in Russian].
23. Hekl, V. (2015). Novaia zhizn starykh veshchei [New life of old things]. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber [in Russian].
24. Hill, N. (2004). Izmerenie udovletvorennosti potrebitelia po standartu ISO 9000:2000 [Measuring customer satisfaction by ISO 9000: 2000]. Moscow: Izdatelskii dom «Tehnolohii» [in Russian].
25. Chesbro, G. (2007). Otkrytyie innovatsii. Sozdanie pribylnykh tehnolohii [Open Innovation. Creating Profiting from Technology]. Moscow: Pokolenie [in Russian].
26. Jansen, F. (2002). Еpokha innovatsii [The era of innovation]. Moscow: INFRA-M [in Russian].
27. Bhalla, G. (2011). Collaboration and Co-creation: New Platforms for Marketing and Innovation. New York: Springer [in English].
28. Dervojeda, K., Verzijl, D., & Nagtegaal, F. (2015). Design for Innovation: Co-creation design as a new way of value creation. Business Innovation Observatory Contract, 190, 18 [in English].
29. Enkel, Е., Gassmann, O., & Chesbrough, H. (2009). Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management, 4, 311-316 [in English].
30. Lakhani, К.R. (2007). The Value of Openness in Scientific Problem Solving. Boston: Harvard Business School Press [in English].
31. McCann, D., & Wittmann, A. (2015). E-waste Prevention, Take-back System Design and Policy Approaches. Bonn: United Nations University [in English].
32. Page, S.E. (2007). The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press [in English].
33. Pater, М. (2011). Co-creation’s 5 guiding principles. http://www.thunderfactory.com. Retrieved from http://www.thunderfactory.com/pdfs/Cocreation 0princples 2011-09.pdf [in English].
34. Prahalad, С.К., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of interactive marketing, 3, 5-14 [in English].
35. Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2014). The Co-Creation Paradigm. Stanford: Stanford University Press [in English].
36. Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2014). The Global Innovation Index 2014: The Human Factor in Innovation. Geneva: WIPO [in English].
37. The top 20 reasons startups fail. (n.d.). www.cbinsights.com. Retrieved from https://www.cbinsights.com/research-reports/The-20-Reasons-Startups-Fail.pdf [in English].