Abstract

The article considers main tendencies of development of health of the Republic, the analysis of innovative activity of Kazakhstan medicine. The article reveals the essence and necessity of introduction of innovative technologies, which in modern conditions is one of the priority factors of organizational culture change. The ever-changing conditions in the world lead to the emergence of new health professions and, according, is not only innovative approaches to education and competencies of professionals, but also to diversify the existing medical staff, who will be able to solve the burning problems faced by medical institutions.

Keywords: innovation, medicine, healthcare, medical technology, innovative activity

JEL Classification: I15.

Cite as: Shevyakova, A. & Sharip, B. (2017). Assessment of innovative activity of Kazakhstan healthcare organizations. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 288-297. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2017.2-27

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Abrhám, J., Bilan, Y., Krauchenia, A., & Strielkowski, W. (2015). Planning horizon in labour supply of Belarusian small entrepreneurs. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 28(1), 773-787.
2. Ahmed, A., McGough, D., & Mateo-Garcia, M. (2017). Testing innovative technologies for retrofitting: Coventry University as a living lab. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4(3), 257-270, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.4.3S(2).
3. Allabouche, K., Diouri, O., Gaga, A., & El Amrani El Idrissi, N. (2016). Mobile phones’ social impacts on sustainable human development: case studies, Morocco and Italy. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4(1), 64-73, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2016.4.1(6).
4. Aubakirova, A., Bekembaeva, G., & Mergentay, A. (2014). Assessment of the level of innovative activity of health organizations of different levels, analysis of the factors and reasons for limiting the introduction of new medical technologies into the health system of the Republic of Kazakhstan. group-global.org. Retrieved from http://group-global.org/sites/default/files/publications/Оценка%20инновационного%20потенциала.docx.
5. Baiterek National Managing Holding JSC // “National Agency for Technological Development” // Ministry of Industry and New Technologies of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2013). Report on trends of innovation development in the Republic of Kazakhstan and in the World.
6. Bekembayeva. G., Koykov. V., Mergentay. A., Mussina G., & Solodovnikov M. (2015). Current state of investment activity in the field of health care in Kazakhstan. Success of modern natural study, 9(1), 20-33. Retrieved from http://www.natural-sciences.ru/ru/article/view?id=35520.
7. Boonyachut, S. (2016). Sustainability of community’s entrepreneurship: case of floating market at Ladmayom. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 4(2), 211-219, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2016.4.2(8).
8. Čábelková, I., Strielkowski, W., & Mirvald, M. (2015). Business influence on the mass media: a case study of 21 countries. Transformation in Business & Economics, 14(1), 65-75. 
9. Chiabai, A., Platt, S., & Strielkowski, W. (2014). Eliciting users’ preferences for cultural heritage and tourism-related e-services: a tale of three European cities. Tourism Economics, 20(2), 263-277. 
10. Dalati, S., & Al Hamwi, S.E. (2016). Sustainable development in higher education through service quality and price fairness: empirical evidence from private universities in Syria. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4(1), 25-38, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2016.4.1(3).
11. Fennell, M. (2008). The New Medical Technologies and the Organization of Medical Science and Treatment. Journal Health Serv Res. 43 (1 Pt 1), DOI: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2323138/.
12. García-Fuentes, M.A., & de Torre, C. (2017). Towards smarter and more sustainable regenerative cities: the REMOURBAN model. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4(3), 328-338, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.4.3S(8).
13. Glazar, O., & Strielkowski, W. (2010). Turkey and the European Union: possible incidence of the EU accession on migration flows. Prague Economic Papers, 19(3), 218-235.
14. Ignatavičius, R., Tvaronavičienė, M., & Piccinetti, L. (2015). Sustainable development through technology transfer networks: case of Lithuania. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4(3), 261-267, DOI: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2015.4.3(6).
15. Kazakhstan investment attractiveness survey. (2014). invest.gov.kz. Retrieved from http://invest.gov.kz/uploads/files/2015/08/19/privlekatelnost-kazahstana.pdf.
16. Кevin. J., Scanlon. M., & Lieberman. A. (2014). Commercialization of Medical Technologies. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2267620/.
17. Kiškis, M., Limba, T., & Gulevičiūtė, G. (2016). Business value of Intellectual Property in Biotech SMEs: case studies of Lithuanian and Arizona’s (US) firms. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4(2), 221-234, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2016.4.2(11).
18. Laužikas, M., Miliūtė, A, Tranavičius, L., & Kičiatovas, E. (2016). Service Innovation Commercialization Factors in the Fast Food Industry. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4(2), 108-128, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2016.4.2(1).
19. Ministry of industry and new technologies of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2013). Strategic plan of the Ministry of industry and new technologies of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2014-2018. Retrieved from http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P1300001574.
20. Mouraud, A. (2017). Innovative time series forecasting: auto regressive moving average vs deep networks. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4(3), 282-293, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.4.3S(4.
21. National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2015). Report of the on 2015. www.nationalbank.kz. Retrieved from http://www.nationalbank.kz/cont/ГО_2015_%20русск_.pdf.
22. Oates, M., Melia, A., & Ferrando, V. (2017). Energy balancing accross cities: Virtual Power Plant prototype and iURBAN case studies. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4(3), 351-363, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.4.3S(10).
23. Oganisjana, K., Surikova, S., & Laizāns, T. (2015). Factors influencing social innovation processes in Latvia: qualitative research perspective. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 3(2), 186-197, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2015.3.2(6).
24. Olefirenko, O., Petrenko, E., Shevyakova, A., & Zhartay, Z. (2016). Towards economic security through diversification: case of Kazakhstan. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(4), 509-518, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2016.5.4(6).
25. Passerini, F., Sterling, R., Keane, M., Klobut, K., & Costa, A. (2017). Energy efficiency facets: innovative district cooling systems. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4(3), 310-318, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.4.3S(6).
26. Pauceanu, A.M. (2016). Innovation and entrepreneurship in Sultanate of 0man – an empirical study. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4(1), 83-99, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2016.4.1(8).
27. Perfido, D., Raciti, M., Zanotti, C., Chambers, N., Hannon, L., Keane, M., Clifford, E., & Costa, A. (2017). Towards sustainable water networks: automated fault detection and diagnosis. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4(3), 339-350, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.4.3S(9).
28. Raudeliūnienė, J., Stadnik, B., & Kindarytė, R. (2016). Knowledge appliance process: theoretical and practical evaluation aspects. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 3(4), 368-379, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2016.3.4(5).
29. Rezk, M.A., Ibrahim, H.H., Radwan, A., Sakr, M.M., Tvaronavičienė, M., & Piccinetti, L. (2016). Innovation magnitude of manufacturing industry in Egypt with particular focus on SMEs. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 3(4), 307-318, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2016.3.4(1).
30. Shevyakova, A. (2014). Features of the socio-economic stratification in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Social sciences for regional development in 2014: Proceedings of the IX International Scientific Conference (17-18 October 2014). Daugavpils University Latvia.
31. Shevyakova, A., & Sharip, B. (2014).  Introduction of innovative technologies as a factor of change in the organizational culture of new medical profession. Entrepreneurship, social organization in network structures. Experience and development prospects in Central and Eastern European Conference (23-25 May 2016). Lublin Catholic University of John Paul II.
32. Štitilis, D., Pakutinskas, P., & Malinauskaitė, I. (2016). Preconditions of sustainable ecosystem: cyber security policy and strategies. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4(2), 174-182, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2016.4.2(5).
33. Strielkowski, W. (2016). Entrepreneurship, sustainability, and solar distributed generation. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4(1), 9-16, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2016.4.1(1).
34. Strielkowski, W., & Čábelková, I. (2015). Religion, Culture, and Tax Evasion: Evidence from the Czech Republic. Religions, 6(2), 657-669. 
35. Strielkowski, W., & Weyskrabova, B. (2014). Ukrainian labour migration and remittances in the Czech Republic. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 105(1), 30-45.
36. Tvaronavičienė, M. (2016). Entrepreneurship and energy consumption patterns: case of households in selected countries. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4(1), 74-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2016.4.1(7).
37. Tvaronavičienė, M., & Černevičiūtė, J. (2015). Technology transfer phenomenon and its impact on sustainable development. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 5(1), 87-97, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2015.5.1(7).
38. Tvaronavičienė, M., Razminienė, K., & Piccinetti, L. (2015). Cluster efficiency study through benchmarking. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 3(2), 120-128, DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2015.3.2(0).
39. World Bank. (2015). Kazakhstan: Adjusting to Low Oil Prices, Challenging Times Ahead. www.worldbank.org. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/kazakhstan/publication/economic-update-fall-2015.
40. Zemlickiene, V., Mačiulis, A., & Tvaronavičienė, M. (2017). Factors impacting the commercial potential of technologies: expert approach. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 23(2), 410-427, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2016.1271061.