Contents |
Authors:
A. Kasych, Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design (Kyiv, Ukraine) | Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice (České Budějovice, Czech Republic) М. Vochozka, Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice (České Budějovice, Czech Republic)
Pages: 298-305
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2017.2-28
Download: |
Views: |
Downloads: |
|
|
|
Abstract
The article investigates theoretical position of the processes of enterprise sustainable development management, summarizes conclusions of the leading scientists in this field, and emphasizes importance of the stability development management on the systematic basis in modern corporations.
The purpose of the article is to systematize the core positions of the theory of sustainable development of the enterprise and to justify the components of the model of the process management.
Such scientific and methodological approaches as combinatorial, structural, resource, and of harmonious interaction ones have been used to determine the characteristics of the processes of sustainable development of enterprises. A generalization of these approaches allows formulating a content of the essence of the company’s sustainability concept and to determine its key features that should be considered during management.
Based on summarizing the experience of leading companies the author represents the key areas and indicators, which are used by enterprises in sustainability management.
For implementation of the theoretical positions of the enterprise sustainable development in management practices there has been proposed a conceptual model which represents stages and tools the implementation of which will provide a systematic solution to the problem of sustainability.
Keywords: sustainability, development, concept, management, enterprise
JEL Classification: M10, О40.
Cite as: Kasych A. & Vochozka, М. (2017). Theoretical and methodical principles of managing enterprise sustainable development. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 298-305. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2017.2-28
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
- Artyuhov, V.V. (2009). Obschaya teoriya sistem: Samoorganizatsiya, ustoychivost, raznoobrazie, krizisyi [General theory of systems: Self-organization, sustainability, diversity, crises]. Moscow: Knizhnyiy dom «LIBROKOM» [in Russian].
- Vasilenko, V.A. (2005). Menedzhment ustoychivogo razvitiya predpriyatiy [Management of sustainable development of enterprises]. Kyiv : TsUL [in Ukrainian].
- Lepa, R.N., Pushkar, A.I., Raevneva, E.V. et al (2005). Modelirovanie protsessov upravleniya razvitiem predpriyatiy [Modeling of enterprise development management processes]. Donetsk : IEP NAN Ukrainyi [in Ukrainian].
- Shandova, N.V. (2014). Metodolohiya ta praktyka upravlinnya stiykym rozvytkom promyslovykh pidpryyemstv [Methodology and practice of sustainable development industry]. Kherson : PP Vyshemyrs’kyy V.S. [in Ukrainian].
- Shvydanenko, H.O., & Oleksyuk, O.I. (2002). Suchasna tekhnolohiya diahnostyky finansovo-ekonomichnoyi diyal’nosti pidpryyemstva [Modern technology diagnostics of financial and economic activity of the enterprise]. Kyiv : KNEU [in Ukrainian].
- Atkinson, G., Hett, Т., & Newcombe, J. (2000). Measuring corporate sustainability. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43 (2), 235–252.
- International Institute for Sustainable Development (1992). Business strategies for sustainable development. iisd.org. Retrieved from https://www.iisd.org/business/tools/strategies.aspx.
- Gladwin, T.N., Kennelly, J.J. & Krause, T-S. (1995). Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research. The Academy of Management Review, 20 (4), 874-907.
- McKinsey&Company (2010). How companies manage sustainability: McKinsey Global Survey results. mckinsey.com. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability-and-resource-productivity/our-insights/how-companies-manage-sustainability-mckinsey-global-survey-results.
- Baumgartner, R.J., & Ebner, D. (2010). Corporate Sustainability Strategies: Sustainability Profiles and Maturity Levels. Sustainable Development, 18, 76–89.
- Dvořáková, L., & Jitka Zborková, J. (2014). Integration of Sustainable Development at Enterprise Level. Procedia Engineering, 69, 686–695.
- Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond The Business Case for Corporate Sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11, 130–141.
- Epstein, M.J. (2008). Making sustainability work: best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental and economic impacts. San Francisco : Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
- Pojasek, R.B. (2007). A Framework for Business Sustainability. Environmental Quality Management, 17 (2), 81-88.
- Sartakov, V. (2014). Sustainable Development and Organizational change. systemsand.me. Retrieved from http://systemsand.me/articles/2014/12/sustainability/pdf/main.pdf
- Strand, R. (2014). Strategic Leadership of Corporate Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics.Volume, 123 (4), 687–706.
- Theodore, J. (2014). The Necessity Of Strategic Leadership in Corporate Sustainability. Journal of Sustainability Management, 2 (1), 23-30.
- German Council for Sustainable Development (2016). The Sustainability Code Benchmarking sustainable economy. sustainabilitycode. Retrieved from www.sustainabilitycode.org.
- The Volkswagen Group (2016). The Volkswagen Group’s Sustainability Report. volkswagenag.com. Retrieved from http://www.volkswagenag.com/en/sustainability/reporting.html.
- Toyota Motor Corporation (2016). Sustainability Data Book 2016. toyota-global.com. Retrieved from http://www.toyota-global.com/sustainability/common/viewer/?file=/sustainability/report/sr/pdf/sustainability_data_book16_fie.pdf.
|