Contents |
Authors:
A. Kucher, NSC «Institute for Soil Science and Agrochemistry Research named after O N Sokolovsky» (Kharkiv, Ukraine) L. Kucher, Kharkiv National Agrarian University named after V V Dokuchaev (Kharkiv, Ukraine)
Pages: 43-52
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2017.3-04
Download: |
Views: |
Downloads: |
|
|
|
Abstract
The aim of this paper – based on marketing research to determine the status and most essential problems that hamper the transfer of innovation in the field of protection and rational use of soil in agricultural production.
The results of the analysis. According to the survey, 68% of surveyed enterprises engaged in crop innovation, 20% do not exercise, and 12% of respondents are undecided on the issue, which may indicate a lack of understanding of the essence of the innovation. The main reasons for refusal of innovative activity is the lack of financial resources – 40% of main agronomists and experts believe in this fact, a fifth of respondents does not see the need in implementing innovation, which is the result of manifestation of sociocultural psychological type. The same number of respondents does not conduct innovation due to low staff qualifications and significant risks associated with the implementation of innovative projects. One of the main obstacles to the development of innovative enterprises in crop is harmonization of their interaction with the scientific area as a major source of innovation (28% of farms do not cooperate with research institutions), of which the vast majority (71.4%) do not cooperate due to the lack of such requirements. Among those companies that collaborate with research institutions, priority areas of cooperation are: purchasing new, more productive varieties of plants (88.9%); acquisition of new agricultural machinery use (55.6%); new acquisition of chemicals (38.9%); improvement of fertilization (33.3%); analysis of soil agrochemical survey (27.8%); business plans, process maps, cost estimates and other documentation (27.8%); development and crop rotation study (22.2%).
Based on the results of the survey we may indicate a lack of scale transfer of innovation in the protection and rational use of soil in agricultural production, due to both objective and subjective factors. The need for periodic inspections of such importance predetermined enhance innovation in agricultural production, which requires appropriate management decisions to develop innovative policies based on factual information about the characteristics of innovation and its inhibition causes. Obviously, such investigations must periodically carry out by State Statistics Service of Ukraine in scales of entire country. For this it would be worth to carry out state statistical observation of innovative activity of agricultural enterprises by methodology similar to that which currently service uses during research of innovative activity of industrial enterprises.
Conclusions and directions of further researches. The study determined the status and most essential issues that hamper the transfer of innovation in the protection and rational use of soil in agricultural production. One of the strategic areas of research in the field of protection and rational use of the soil should be nano- and nanobiotechnology reproduction of soil fertility and increase their productivity, corresponding technological structure VI (2010-2050). Working in this direction, you can create breakthrough innovation, the use of which can provide innovative and proactive qualitatively new model of agricultural production. The obtained results develop scientific basis of transfer of agricultural innovations in the part of identification of problems and supplement by institutional factors that prevent implementation of soil protection innovations. Further research should aim at justification of institutional basis of activating transfer of agricultural innovations.
Keywords: marketing of innovations, transfer of innovations, innovative activity, soil protection, soil fertility, land use, agricultural enterprises
JEL Classification: M31, O32, Q13, Q15.
Cite as: Kucher, A., & Kucher, L. (2017). State and problems of transfer of innovations in land use of agricultural enterprises. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 43-52. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2017.3-04
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
- Shubravska, O.V. (2010). Innovacijni transformaciyi agroprodovol`chogo sektora ekonomiky : svitovi tendenciyi ta vitchy`znyani realiyi [Innovative transformation of agri-food sector of the economy: global trends and domestic realities]. Ekonomika i prognozuvannya – Economics and Forecasting, 3, 90-102 [in Ukrainian].
- Ilnytskyy, D.O. (2015). Global`ny`j naukovo-osvitnij prostir : konkurenciya nacional`ny`x agrarno-promy`slovy`x kompleksiv [Global scientific and educational space: competition national agro-industrial complexes]. Materialy mizhnarodnji naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii «Fundamental`ni ta prykladni problemy pidpry`yemnyczkoyi diyalnosti v agrarnomu sektori» – Materials of the International Scientific Conference «Fundamental and applied problems of entrepreneurship in the agricultural sector». (pp. 197-201). Kharkiv : KhNAU [in Ukrainian].
- Adenle, A.A., Sowe, S.K., Parayil, G. & Aginam, O.A. (2012). Analysis of open source biotechnology in developing countries : An emerging framework for sustainable agriculture. Technology in Society, 34, 256–269. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2012.07.004.
- World Bank (n.d.). World development report: agriculture for development. Washington, DC: Office of the Publisher, the World Bank. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDR2008/Resources/WDR_00_book.pdf.
- Ma, W. (2011). Research on portfolio optimization of agricultural intellectual property promotion engineering projects. Systems Engineering Procedia, 2, 324–330. DOI: 10.1016/j.sepro.2011.10.045.
- Cozzens, S.E., Kallerud, E., Ackers, L., Gill, B., Harper, J. & Pereira, T.S. et al.(2007). Problems of Inequality in Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy. James Martin Institute Working Paper 5. Project Deliverable № 2. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/uniid-sea/april-2007-problems-of-inequality-in-science-technology-and-innovation-policy.
- Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy pryiniala u pershomu chytanni zakonoproekt «Pro naukovu ta naukovo-tekhnichnu diialnist» (n.d.). mon.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://mon.gov.ua/usi-novivni/novini/2015/11/10/verxovna-rada-ukrayini-prijnyala-u-pershomu/ [in Ukrainian].
- Sait Ministerstva osvity i nauky Ukrainy [Site of Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine]. mon.gov.ua. http://mon.gov.ua/usi-novivni/novini/2015/12/04/brifing-maksim-strixa/ [in Ukrainian].
- Goncharenko, O. V. (2012). Innovatsiinyi rozvytok ahrarnykh pidpryiemstv u konteksti formuvannia informatsiinoi ekonomiky [Innovative development of agrarian enterprises in the context of information economy building-up]. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky – Actual problems of economy, 10, 103-109 [in Ukrainian].
- Kalachova, I.V., Shubravska, O.V. & Prokopenko, K.O (2013). Innovatsiina diialnist silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv: pereshkody ta napriamy rozvytku [Innovative activity agricultural enterprises, obstacles and areas of developmen]. Statystyka Ukrainy – Statistics of Ukraine, 1, 10-16 [in Ukrainian].
- Kuznetsova, Yu. (2015). Naukovo-metodychni zasady rozvytku marketynhu innovatsii ahrarnykh pidpryiemstv [Scientific and methodical bases of development of marketing of innovations at agrarian enterprises]. Agricultural and Resource Economics : International Scientific E-Journal, 2 (1). Retrieved from www.are-journal.com [in Ukrainian].
- Shyrma, V.V. (2015). Upravlinnia innovatsiinym rozvytkom pidpryiemstv u haluzi roslynnytstva [Management of the innovative development of enterprises in the crop production branch]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Bila Tserkva: BNAU [in Ukrainian].
- Shyrma, V.V. (2015). Upravlinnia innovatsiinym rozvytkom pidpryiemstv u haluzi roslynnytstva [Management of the innovative development of enterprises in the crop production branch]. Candidate’s thesis. Bila Tserkva: BNAU [in Ukrainian].
- Kalna-Dubiniuk, T.P., & Lytovchenko, A.M. (2014). Ocinka efekty`vnosti informacijno-konsul`tacijnogo zabezpechennya poshy`rennya innovacijny`x biotexnologij v umovax ry`zy`ku ta nevy`znachenosti [Evaluation of the effectiveness of informational and consulting support for distribultion of innovative biotechnologies under conditions of risk and uncertainty]. Ekonomika APK Economy AIC, 2, 70–75 [in Ukrainian].
- Lytovchenko, A.M. (2015). Organizaciya informacijno-konsul`tacijnogo zabezpechennya poshyrennya innovacij u roslynnycztvi [The organization of information and consultation provision dissemination of innovations in crop production]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv: NSC «IAE» [in Ukrainian].
|