Abstract

The article deals with investigating the existing methodical approaches to the processes of sustainable development on enterprises, summarising conclusions of the scientists in this field. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the directions of improving the existing methodical approaches to the analysis of the enterprise sustainability development processes and to conduct their testing on the real enterprises examples. The analysis method of the enterprise development sustainability is suggested to consider as an instrument for incorporating sustainable development issues into the managerial practice. To determine the characteristics of the sustainable development processes on enterprises, the author uses such scientific and methodological approaches as combinatorial, structural, resource, harmonious interaction. The conceptual model representing the stages and tools, implementation of which will provide a systematic solution of the problem of sustainability is suggested for implementing the theoretical positions of sustainable enterprise development in management practices. To ensure the implementation, the submitted scoreboard in the analytical practice the authors make calculations of the sustainability of the enterprises development, using information of the machine-building industry. The scoreboard of the balanced indicators of stability allows to assess stability according to the fragmentary, integrated and integral approaches and to combine their advantage.    

Keywords: sustainability, development, efficiency indexes, methods of analysis, estimation criteria

JEL Classification: C81, D22, M10.

Cite as: Kasych, A., & Vochozka, M. (2018). Methodical support of the enterprise sustainable development management. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 371-381. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2018.1-29

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Oficialnyj sait OAO “KAMAZ” [Official site of JSC KAMAZ.]. kamaz.ru. Retrieved from http://www.kamaz.ru/investors-and-shareholders/financial-statements/annual-report [in Russian].
2. Honcharenko, O.M. (2011). Diahnostyka ta instrumentariy otsinky stiykoho rozvytku pidpryyemstva [Diagnostics and tools for assessing the sustainable development of the enterprise]. Pratsi Odeskoho politekhnichnoho universytetu – Odeskyi Politechnichnyi Universytet. Pratsi, 2(36), 312-319 [in Ukrainian].
3. Kindratska, H.I. (2014). Stiykist pidpryyemstva: dialektyka statyky i dynamiky [Firm firmness: dialectics of statics and dynamics]. Visnyk Natsionalnyy universytet “Lvivs’ka politekhnika” – Bulletin of the National University “Lviv Polytechnic”, 797, 235-241 [in Ukrainian].
4. Manoylenko, O.V., & Syromyatnykova, O.V. (2015). Teoretychni aspekty vyznachennya stiykosti sotsialno-ekonomichnykh system [Theoretical aspects of determining the stability of socio-economic systems]. Biznes Inform – Business Inform, 12, 8-14 [in Ukrainian].
5. Ofitsiynyy sayt kompaniyi PAT “AvtoKrAZ” [The official site of PJSC “AvtoKrAZ’’]. autokraz.com.ua. Retrieved from http://www.autokraz.com.ua [in Ukrainian].
6. Savytska, O.M., & Zarechna, K.S. (2016). Rezultaty kompleksnoho analizu ta otsinyuvannya stiykosti promyslovoho pidpryyemstva v umovakh formuvannya kontseptsiyi stiykoho rozvytku ta upravlinnya vytratamy [Results of complex analysis and evaluation of the stability of an industrial enterprise in the context of the formation of the concept of sustainable development and cost management]. Efektyvna ekonomika – Effective economy, 1. Retrieved from http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=4740 [in Ukrainian].
7. Ofitsiynyy sayt Derzhavnoyi sluzhby statystyky Ukrayiny [Official site of the State Statistics Service of Ukraine]. ukrstat.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].
8. Shandova, N.V. (2010). Uzahalnyuyucha otsinka stabil’nosti rozvytku pidpryyemstv promyslovoho kompleksu [Summary evaluation of the stability of the industrial complex enterprises development]. Vestnyk KhNTU – Bulletin of KhNTU, 1(34), 83-86 [in Ukrainian].
9. Amrina, E., & Yosof, S. (2011). Key performance indicators for sustainable manufacturing evaluation in automotive companies. Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 2011 IEEE International Conference, 1093-1097.
10. Atkinson, G., Hett, Т. & Newcombe, J. (2000). Measuring corporate sustainability. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(2), 235-252.
11. Figge, F., Tobias Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002). The sustainability Balanced Scorecard–theory and application of a tool for value-based sustainability management. Greening of Industry Network Conference, Gothenburg Volume 2. Retrieved from http://www.ecnc.org/uploads/documents/the-sustainably-balanced-scorecard-theory-and-application-of-a-tool-for-value-based-sustainability-management.pdf.
12. Hart, S L. and Milstein, M.B. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 17, 2, 56-69.
13. Kasem, E., Trenz, О., Hřebiček, J., & Faldik, O. (2015). Key sustainability performance indicator analysis for Czech breweries. Acta Uiversitatis agriculturae mendelianae brunensis, Vol.63, 1937-1944.
14. Keeble, J., Topiol, S., & Berkeley, S. (2003). Using indicators to measure sustainability performance at a corporate and project level. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 149-158.
15. Nicolăescu, E., Alpopi, C., & Zaharia, C. (2015). Measuring Corporate Sustainability Performance. Sustainability, 7, 851-865.
16. Pojasek, R.B. (2007). A Framework for Business Sustainability. Environmental Quality Management, 17 (2), 81-88. 
17. Official site of Volkswagen Group. volkswagenag.com. Retrieved from http: www.volkswagenag.com/vwag/vwcorp/content/en/homepage.html.
18. Official site of The World Bank. data.worldbank.org. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator.
19. Wagenhals, S., Garner, W., Duckers, L., & Kuhn, K. (2014). Sustainability Index With Integrated Indicator Dependencies. Business, Management and Education, 12(1), 15-29.