Abstract

Main aim of the article is to analyse the existing international legal framework of performing mining activities in the outer space. Exploitation and sharing of natural resources of the outer space is an important challenge for international governance systems. The existing acts of law concerning the utilization of space are outdated and some of them have marginal importance due to the law ratification number. The rules for the use and equitable sharing of benefits coming from exploitation of natural resources in space can be reconstructed from general principles of law referring to the outer space management as well as in some extent from the international agreements. Principle of non-appropriation, as well as principle of freedom of conducting scientific research of outer space formulates borders which embrace the commercial activities in space. The imprecise character of legal principles together with sometimes ambiguous wording of international legal rules leaves space for discussion as to the character of limits and conditions of space mining activities. Two concepts – the common province of mankind and common heritage of mankind are engaged to describe the current status of celestial bodies and outer space. Under certain conditions they can also be treated as describing the status of natural resources of the outer space. The normative consequences of using those two concepts are however unclear. First of those concepts – common province of mankind – is seldomly used and barely cleared in international legal order. Common heritage of mankind is well known concept and could substitute for more detailed regulation but also requires certain procedural and institutional framework. Article tries to answer questions concerning the limits of non-appropriation principle, and potential conditions under which space mining activities could be performed “for the benefit of mankind”. It also tries to decide if current system of governance of space, including celestial bodies and natural resources situated on them is sufficient to ensure the promotion of values which stem from principles of international space law. Finally article tries to predict the prospects of future development of international space law in the field of regulation of natural resources exploitation. By using the analogy from the deepsea mining regime, and basing on the wording of existing sources of international space law, article indicates areas and directions of probable changes in the international space law.

Keywords: moon, management, norms, law, resourses.

JEL Classification: Q54, K2.

Cite as: Nyka, M. (2018). Legal prerequisites of the management of natural resources of the Moon and other celestial bodies. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 199-207. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2018.3-17

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. J. Gilas, Sprawiedliwość międzynarodowa gospodarcza, Toruń 1991,
2. M. Nyka Instrumenty ograniczania wpływu handlu na środowisko. Studium z prawa międzynarodowego. Warszawa 2018
3. R. Lee Law and Regulation of Commercial Mining of Minerals in Outer Space. Dordrecht New York, 2012
4. D. Pyć Prawo oceanu światowego. Gdańsk 2011,
5. B. Boutros-Ghali International Cooperation in Space Activities for Enhancing Security in Post-Cold War Era UN Doc. A/48/221,
6. F. Tronchetti The Exploitation of Natural Resources of the Moon and other Celestial Bodies. A Proposal for a Legal Regime. Leiden/Boston 2009;
7. L. Viikari The Envronmental Element in Space Law: Assessing the Present and Charting the Future. Leiden/Boston 2008
8. N. Harn Commercial Mining of Cellestial Bodies: A legal Roadmap. The Georgetown International Environmental Law Review. Vol. 27 (2015),
9. B. Cooper, D. Schrunk, G. Sharpe, M. Thungavelu (ed.) The Moon: Resources, Future Development, and Settlement, Berlin, Springer and Praxis, 2008,
10. C. Neal The Moon 35 years after Apollo: What’s Left to Learn. Chemie der Erde vol. 69 (2009)
11. https://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Operations/Space_Debris/About_space_debris
12. J. Pearson, E. Levin, J. Carroll Enhancing Space Elevator Safety by Active Debris Removal. CLIMB vol. 1, no. 1 (2011),
13. A. Górbiel Międzynarodowe prawo kosmiczne. Warszawa 1985
14. Z. Galicki Status prawny kosmosu. [in:] A. Wasilkowski (ed.) Działalność kosmiczna w świetle prawa międzynarodowego. Wrocław, Warszawa, Kraków 1991,
15. F. Tronchetti The Non-appropriation Principle Under Attack: Using Article II of the Outer Space Traty in it’s Defence. International Astronautical Federation Paper IAC-07-E6.5.13 (2007),
16. R. Lee Article II of the Outer Space Treaty: Prohibition of State Sovereignty, Private Property Rights or Both?. Australian Journal of International Law vol. 11(2004),
17. Z. Galicki Status prawny kosmosu. [in:] A. Wasilkowski (ed.) Działalność kosmiczna w świetle prawa międzynarodowego. Wrocław, Warszawa, Kraków 1991,
18. F. van der Dunk International space law. [in:] F. van der Dunk, F. Tronchetti. (ed.) Handbook of space law Edward Elgar 2015,
19. M. Smirnoff Legal Studies on Celestial Bodies. Journal of Air Law & Commerce vol. 28 (1961-1962)
20. R. Lee Article II of the Outer Space Treaty: Prohibition of State Souvereignity, Private Property Rights, or Both?. Australian Journal of International Law vol. 11 (2004),
21. P. Sters, L. Tennen Privateering and Profitering on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies: Debunking the Myth of Property Rights in Space. Proceedings of the Forty-fifth Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space (2003),
22. V. Pop Appropriation in Outer Space: The Relationship Between Land and Ownership and Souvereginity on the Clelestial Bodies. Space Policy vol. 16 (2000),
23. L. Tennen Second Commentary on Emerging System of Property Rights in Outer Space Proceedings of the United Nations/Republic of Korea Workshops on Space Law (2003),
24. F. Tronchetti Legal aspects of space resource utilization [in:] F. van der Dunk, F. Tronchetti. (red.) Handbook of space law Edward Elgar 2015,
25. Gregor Nimitz vs. The United States of America et. al. 2003 WL 24268455 (D.Nev.) 6 Nov. 2003.
26. M. Listner The Ownership and Exploitation of Outer Space: A Look at Foundational Law and Future Challenges to Current Claims. Regent Journal of International Law vol. 1 (2003),
27. B. Cheng Le Traité de 1967 sur l’espace. Journal du droit international no 3 (1968),
28. S. Gorove Limitations on the Principles of Freedom of Exploration and Use in Outer Space: Benefits and Intersts. [in:] Proceedings of the Thirteenth Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space (1971),
29. F. Lyall, P. Larsen Space Law. A Treatise. Ashgate/Burlington 2009,
30. W. Erlank Rethinking Terra Nullius and Property Law in Space. [w:] Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, Vol. 18, No. 7, (2015)
31. E. Fasan The Meaning of the Term Mankind in Space Legal Language Journal of Space Law vol. 2 (1974),
32. S. Williams The Law of Outer Space and Natural Resources. International Law & Comparative Law Quertarly vol. 36 (1987),
33. S. Grove The Concept of “Common Heritage of Mankind”: A Political, Moral or Legal Innovation? San Diego Law Review vol. 9 (1972),
34. M. Nyka Future Generations Rights to Natural Resources: The Post Rio 20+ Perspective [w:] Enacting Environmental Justice through Global Citizenship M. Nyka, E. Schneider (ed.) Oxford 2014
35. D. Tan Towards a New Regime for the Protection of Outer Space the “Province of All Mankind”. Yale Journal of International Law vol. 25(2000),
36. J. Gabrynowicz The „Province” and „Heritage” of Mankind Reconsidered: A New Beginning. he Second Conference on Lunar Bases and Space Activities of the 21st Century, Proceedings from a conference held in Houston, TX, April 5-7, 1988. Edited by W. W. Mendell, NASA Conference Publication 3166, 1992,
37. T. Adams The Outer Space Treaty: An Interpretation in Light of the No-Souvereignity Provision. Harvard International Law Journal vol. 9 no. 1 (1968),
38. M. Lachs The Law of Outer Space: An Experience in Contemporary Law-Making Laiden 1972
39. J. Brunnee Common Areas, Heritage, Concern. [in:] D. Bodansky, J. Brunne, E. Hey (ed.) Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law Oxfrod 2007,
40. G.Hardin The Tragedy of the Commons, Science no . 162 (1968),
41. R. Wolfrum The Principle of the Common Heritage of Mankind. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht vol. 43 (1983),
42. S. Mirzaee Outer Space and Common Heritage of Mankind: Challenges and Solutions. RUDN Journal of Law t. 21, no 1.
43. J. Noyes The Common Heritage of Mankind: Past, Present and Future. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy vol. 40 no 1-3
44. S. Bhat The Concept of Common Heritage of Mankind in the Governance of the Moon – An Insight into Article 11 of the Moon Agreement. Legal Opus vol. 1 (2007),
45. S. Freeland Common heritage, not common law: How international law will regulate proposals to exploit space resources. Questions of International Law vol. 35 (2017).