Contents |
Authors:
Yegana Hakimova, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5686-4105 Azerbaijan State University of Economics (Azerbaijan) Yaryna Samusevych, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7048-8388 Sumy State University (Ukraine) Shahla Alijanova, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3115-2635 Azerbaijan State University of Economics (Azerbaijan) Esmira Guluzade, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5633-2130 Azerbaijan State University of Economics (Azerbaijan)
Pages: 312-323
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2021.1-24
Received: 10.09.2020
Accepted: 14.01.2021
Published: 30.03.2021
Download: |
Views: |
Downloads: |
|
|
|
Abstract
The article is devoted to the comparative analysis of the use of environmental taxes and the introduction of environmental innovations in terms of impact on the parameters of revenues and expenditures of the state budget. The study includes 10 countries of Central and Eastern Europe (Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovenia and Slovak Republic). The analysis period covers 2010–2019. Systematization of scientific research proves the importance of using different tools to ensure sustainable development and greening of the national economy. The main purpose of the study is to determine a more effective form of interaction between government and business in the process of transforming the national economy in the direction of more environmentally friendly products and technologies by economic and mathematical modeling of environmental taxes and eco-innovation impact of budget revenues and expenditures. The calculations consist on the several stages: 1) determining the list of relevant control variables using correlation analysis, which eliminates the problem of multicollinearity; 2) determination of the model specification (fixed or random effects) using the Hausman test; 3) identification of the generalizing effects of the impact of environmental taxation and the eco-innovation index on the indicators of budget revenues and expenditures using a generalized least squares panel regression model with random effects; 4) study of the impact of the main components of environmental taxes and components of the eco-innovation index on the parameters of the state budget using panel regression modelling; 5) determination of short-term and long-term effects of the impact of environmental taxes and eco-innovations on the parameters of budget revenues and expenditures bt auto-regression distributive lag modelling. Stata 12/SE software tools were used for calculations. The study indicates the need to transform approaches to the implementation of state environmental policy. Thus, it has been proven that government incentives for the introduction of environmental innovations in the economy can be more effective than increasing the burden of environmental taxes.
Keywords: eco-innovation index, environmental taxation, government revenues, government expenditures, panel data analysis.
JEL Classification: H23, H61, H72, O32, Q56.
Cite as: Hakimova, Y., Samusevych, Y., Alijanova, S., & Guluzade, E. (2021). Eco-innovation vs. environmental taxation: what is more effective for state budget?. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 312-323. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2021.1-24
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
- Akimova, L. M., Akimov, O. O., & Liakhovich, O. O. (2017). State regulation of foreign economic activity. Scientific bulletin of Polissia, 1(4 (12)), 98-103.. [Google Scholar]
- Akimova, L., Akimov, O., Mihus, I., Koval, Y., & Dmitrenko, V. (2020). Improvement of the methodological approach to assessing the impact of public governance on ensuring the economic security of the state. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, 4(35), 180-190. [Google Scholar]
- Baranovskyi, O. I. (2020). Regulation of functional and structural transformational processes in the financial sector. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, 1(32), 292-306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhandari, M. P. (2019). Sustainable Development: Is This Paradigm The Remedy of All Challenges? Does Its Goals Capture The Essence of Real Development and Sustainability? With Reference to Discourses, Creativeness, Boundaries and Institutional Architecture. SocioEconomic Challenges, 3(4), 97-128. [Google Scholar] [crossRef]
- Biewendt, M. (2020). Sustainable Development: A Quantitative Analysis Regarding the Impact of Resource Rents on State Welfare from 2002 to 2017. SocioEconomic Challenges, 4(4), 119-131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilan, Y., Lyeonov, S., Stoyanets, N., & Vysochyna, A. (2018). The impact of environmental determinants of sustainable agriculture on country food security. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 21(5-6), 289-305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilan, Y., Samusevych, Y., & Vysochyna, A. (2019). Drivers and Inhibitors of Entrepreneurship Development in Central and Eastern European Countries. Education Excellence and Innovation Management through Vision 2020: Proceedings of the 33rd International-Business-Information-Management-Association (IBIMA) Conference. P. 2536-2547. [Google Scholar]
- Boyarko, I. M., & Samusevych, Y. V. (2011). Role of intangible assets in company’s value creation. Actual Problems of Economics, (117), 86-94.
- Chygryn, O., Pimonenko, T., Bilan, S., & Starchenko, L. (2019). Digital Marketing for Green Goods Promotion: Modern Trends in Entrepreneurship. Vplyv Industry 4.0 na Tvorbu Pracovnych Miest 2019: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on The Impact of Industry 4.0 on Job Creation, p. 160-166. Retrieved from [Link]
- Eddassi, H. (2020). Fiscal Regime and Tax Policy in Resource-Rich Countries In The Process Of Globalization: Literature Review. SocioEconomic Challenges, 4(2), 67-77. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
- Girchenko, T. D., Panchenko, O.V. (2020). Research on the practical aspects of the providing efficiency of marketing communications’ bank. Financial and credit activity-problems of theory and practice, 3. P. 13-22. [CrossRef]
- Hasan, S., & Dutta, P. (2019). Coverage of Environmental Issues in Local Dailies of Chattogram Centering World Environment Day. SocioEconomic Challenges, 3(4), 63-71. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
- He, S. (2019). The Impact of Trade on Environmental Quality: A Business Ethics Perspective and Evidence from China. Business Ethics and Leadership, 3(4), 43-48. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
- Hrytsenko, L. L., Roienko, V. V., & Boiarko, I. M. (2018). Institutional background of the role of state in investment processes activation. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, 1(24), 338-344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibragimov, Z., Lyeonov, S., & Pimonenko, T. (2019a). Green investing for SDGS: EU experience for developing countries. Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, 867-876. [Google Scholar]
- Ibragimov, Z., Vasylieva, T., & Lyulyov, O. (2019b). The National Economy Competitiveness: Effect of Macroeconomic Stability, Renewable Energy on Economic Growth. Economic and Social Development (ESD 2019): Proceedings of the 37th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development – Socio Economic Problems of Sustainable Development, 878-887. [Google scholar]
- Karaoulanis, A. (2018). Strategic Transformation and Innovation towards Blue Ocean Creation in a Changing Corporate Reality. Business Ethics and Leadership, 2(2), 49-55. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
- Karpa, M. I., Akimova, L. M., Akimov, O. O., Serohina, N., Oleshko, O., & Lipovska, N. (2021). Public administration as a systemic phenomenon in society. AD ALTA: Journal of interdisciplinary research, (11), 56-62. [Google Scholar]
- Kashintseva, V., Strielkowski, W., Streimikis, J., & Veynbender, T. (2018). Consumer attitudes towards industrial CO2 capture and storage products and technologies. Energies, 11(10), 2787. [CrossRef]
- Kasztelnik, K., & Brown, D. (2020). The Observational Socio-Economic Study and Impact on the International Innovative Leadership in the United States. SocioEconomic Challenges, 4(4), 63-94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M. A., & Kishwar, A. (2020). Natural Resource Rent and Financial Development Nexuses in Bangladesh: The Role of Institutional Quality. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 4(2), 108-114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kouassi, K. B. (2018). Public Spending and Economic Growth in Developing Countries: a Synthesis. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 2(2), 22-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuzmenko, O., Vasylieva, T., Vojtovic, S., Chygryn, O., & Snieska, V. (2020). Why Do Regions Differ In Vulnerability To Covid-19? Spatial Nonlinear Modeling Of Social And Economic Patterns. Economics & Sociology, 13(4), 318-340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kyrychenko, K. I., Samusevych, Y. V., Liulova, L. Y., & Bagmet, K. (2018). Innovations in country’s social development level estimation. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 113-128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levchenko, V., Kobzieva, T., Boiko, A., & Shlapko, T. (2018). Innovations in Assessing the Efficiency of the Instruments for the National Economy De-Shadowing: the State Management Aspect. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 361-371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lisin, E., Shuvalova, D., Volkova, I., & Strielkowski, W. (2018). Sustainable development of regional power systems and the consumption of electric energy. Sustainability, 10(4), 1111. [CrossRef]
- Lyeonov, S., Bilan, Y., Rubanov, P., & Grencikova, A. (2019). Countries Financial Development and Digital Readiness as Determinants of Financial Sector Innovativeness. Vision 2025: Education Excellence and Management of Innovations through Sustainable Economic Competitive Advantage: Proceedings of the 34th International-Business-Information-Management-Association (IBIMA) Conference. P. 13604-13619.
- Lyulyov, O., Pimonenko, T., Kwilinski, A., Dzwigol, H., Dzwigol-Barosz, M., Pavlyk, V., & Barosz, P. (2021). The Impact of the Government Policy on the Energy Efficient Gap: The Evidence from Ukraine. Energies, 14(2), 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukherjee, S. (2018). Cross Country Tax Competition and its Impact on Multinational Corporations – a Theoretical Re-examination. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 2(1), 97-104. [Google Scholar]
- Pavlyk, V. (2020). Assessment of green investment impact on the energy efficiency gap of the national economy. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 4(1), 117-123. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
- Rausser, G., Strielkowski, W., & Štreimikienė, D. (2018). Smart meters and household electricity consumption: A case study in Ireland. Energy & Environment, 29(1), 131-146. [CrossRef]
- Rubanov, P., Lyeonov, S., Bilan, Y., & Lyulyov, O. (2019a). The Fintech Sector as a Driver of Private Entrepreneurship Development in Time of Industry 4.0. Vplyv Industry 4.0 na Tvorbu Pracovnych Miest 2019: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on The Impact of Industry 4.0 on Job Creation. P. 319-327. Retrieved from [Link]
- Rubanov, P., Vaylieva, T., Lyeonov, S., & Pokhylko, S. (2019). Cluster analysis of development of alternative finance models depending on the regional affiliation of countries. Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), 15(1). [Google Scholar]
- Taliento, M., & Netti, A. (2020). Corporate Social/Environmental Responsibility and Value Creation: Reflections on a Modern Business Management Paradigm. Business Ethics and Leadership, 4(4), 123-131. [CrossRef]
- Vargas-Hernández, J. G., & Rodríguez, C. R. F. (2018). Leadership Styles as a Challenge to Generate Innovation Environments in the Companies of the 21st Century. Business Ethics and Leadership, 2(4), 64-73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vasylieva, T., Kuzmenko, O., Rashid, M. N., Vojtovic, S., Kascha, M., & Lieonov, H. (2020). Innovations in government management of the healthcare system: forecasting of COVID-19 consequences in social, investment and business development. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 11-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vovchak, O. D., Senyshch, P. M., & Melnyk, T. V. (2019). «Purging» of the banking system: impact on the key performance indicators of banks. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, 1(28), 16-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vysochyna, A., Stoyanets, N., Mentel, G., & Olejarz, T. (2020). Environmental determinants of a country’s food security in short-term and long-term perspectives. Sustainability, 12(10), 4090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yarovenko, H., Bilan, Y., Lyeonov, S., & Mentel, G. (2021). Methodology for assessing the risk associated with information and knowledge loss management. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 22(2), 369-387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zahorskyi, V. S., Lipentsev, A. V., Yurystovska, N. Y., Mazii, N. H., & Akimov, O. O. (2019). Financial and administrative aspects of small business development in Ukraine. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, 3(30), 351-360. [Google Scholar]
|