Contents |
Authors:
Eniko Korcsmaros, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2026-8712 J Selye University (Slovakia) Renata Machova, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7817-0187 J Selye University (Slovakia) Zoltan Seben, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6081-4028 J Selye University (Slovakia) Tibor Zsigmond, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2581-5519 J Selye University (Slovakia)
Pages: 170-180
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2021.1-13
Received: 01.09.2020
Accepted: 01.03.2021
Published: 30.03.2021
Download: |
Views: |
Downloads: |
|
|
|
Abstract
The introduction of the euro in Europe is subject to several criteria. In 1979, the European Community created the «European Exchange Rate Mechanism» (ERM). On 16 April, 2003, Slovakia, together with nine other countries, signed the EU Accession Treaty in Athens. These countries promised to adopt the single currency (the euro). It has been 10 years since the introduction of the euro in Slovakia. It stands to highlight factors that have contributed to the economic, innovation development experienced in recent years regarding introducing a single currency. This article aims to briefly introduce the euro area and present each country’s accession in historical order. the authors presented the general conditions for introducing the euro and then went on to the events related to the regional innovations governance of Slovakia. Using the data from the statistical site Eurostat, the Pearson correlation coefficient was used to indicate the closeness of relationships between the average values of inflation and government deficit and the average values of inflation and the public debt. The limitations of the research are that Eurostat’s values are only indicative and, in the event of a possible accession, EU bodies would certainly use other, more reliable data. Furthermore, the ERM II criterion for joining the euro area cannot be examined due lack of statistics available on the Slovak koruna’s value after the introduction. Another limitation is that the EU sometimes makes adjustments to calculating inflation and average nominal long-term interest rates. There is a lack of a significant relationship between the examined variables in the case of Slovakia. Based on the 2018 inflation rate, the introduction would not have been possible, as it was slightly higher (2.5 per cent) than the limit (2.23 per cent). Therefore, the authors assumed that Slovakia had adopted the euro on time, as if it had not done so on 1 January 2009, it would probably have had to wait a few years for the new opportunity. Although their results are only indicative and not decisive without taking ERM II into account, it is possible to do without specific indicators.
Keywords: innovative development, Slovakia, single currency, inflation rate, government deficit, public debt
JEL Classification: E00, E42, G00.
Cite as: Korcsmaros, E., Machova, R., Seben, Z., & Zsigmond, T. (2021). The regional innovations governance: Slovakia with regard to convergence criteria. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 170-180. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2021.1-13
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
- Bacik, R., Kloudova, J., Gonos, J., & Ivankova, V. (2019). Management of Competitiveness and Economic Performance Based in the V4 countries. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 73-88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baranovskyi, О. І. (2018). Quality of the transformational processes in the financial sector of the national economy: vectors of the measurement. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, 3(26), 350-367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belas, J., Kocisova, K., & Gavurova, B. (2019). Determinants of Cost Efficincy: Evidence from Banking Sectors in EU Countires. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 15(5), 101-123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bielik, P. (2010). Economics, Social Policy and Citizenship in the European Union–evidence of V4 Countries and Perspectives for Ukraine. Visegrad Fund. [Google Scholar]
- Bilan, Y., Mishchuk, H., Roshchyk, I., & Kmecova, I. (2020). An Analysis of Intellecutal Potential and its Impact on the Social and Economic Development of European Countries. Journal of Competitiveness, 12(1), 22–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilan, Y., Rubanov, P., Vasylieva, T., & Lyeonov, S. (2019). The Influence of Industry 4.0 on Financial Services: Determinants of Alternative Finance Development. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(1), 70-93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dzwigol, H., & Wolniak, R. (2018). Controlling w procesie zarządzania chemicznym przedsiębiorstwem produkcyjnym [Controlling in the management process of a chemical industry production company]. Przemysl Chemiczny, 97(7), 1114–1116. [CrossRef]
- EUR-Lex. (2006). Document 32006X0325(01). Megallapodas (2006. marcius 16.) az Európai Központi Bank es az euroövezeten kívüli tagallamok nemzeti központi bankjai között a gazdasagi es monetaris unió harmadik szakaszaban az arfolyam-mechanizmus eljarasi szabalyainak meghatarozasaról.. Retrieved from [Link]
- European Central Bank. (2021). Economic and Monetary Union (EMU). Retrieved from [Link]
- European Commission (2014a). Convergence Report 2014. Retrieved from [Link]
- European Commission .(2013). European integration and enlargement of the European Union. Retrieved from [Link]
- European Commission. (2011). Monetary Agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Andorra. Retrieved from [Link]
- European Commission. (2014b). Economic and monetary union and the euro. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union. Retrieved from [Link]
- European Commission. (2017). European Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations. Iceland. Retrieved from [Link]
- European Commission. (n.d.) EU ENLARGEMENT FACTSHEET. Retrieved from [Link]
- Eurostat (2019c). HICP – inflation rate. Annual average rate of change (%). Retrieved 15 May, 2020. Retrieved from [Link]
- Eurostat (2019d). EMU convergence criterion series – annual data. Retrieved from [Link]
- Eurostat. (2019a). General government deficit (-) and surplus (+) – annual data. Retrieved from [Link]
- Eurostat. (2019b). General government gross debt – annual data. Retrieved from [Link]
- Gavurova, B., Belas, J., Kocisova, K., Dapkus, R., & Bartkute, R. (2017). Revenue and Cost Efficiency of Banking Sectors in The European Union Countries: Do They Depend on Size, Location or Crisis Period?. Transformations in business & economics, 16(2). [Google Scholar]
- Harust, Yu., Melnyk, V. Palienko, M., & Prasol, L. (2019). Economic Security of the Country: Marketing, Institutional and Political Determinants. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 373-382. [Google Scholar] [Cross Ref]
- Helísek, M. (2019). Exchange Rate Mechanism II and the Risk of Currency Crisis – Empiricism and Theory. Journal of International Studies, 12(1), 297-312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jenei, M. (2010). Egyre tavolabb a magyar eurótól. Retrieved from [Link]
- JurсiSinova, A. (2012). Zavedenie eura na Slovensku. 8. Studentska vedecka konferencia. Zborník plných príspevkov, 743-755. [Google Scholar]
- Kljucnikov, A., Belas, J., & Smrcka, L. (2016). The Role of Risk-taking and Competitive Aggressiveness in Management of SMEs. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 14(1), 129-139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kljucnikov, A., Civelek, M., Krajcik, V., & Kmeco, L. (2020). Innovations in Tourism Marketing: Sharing Economy Platform. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 11-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korcsmaros, E., Machova, R., Seben, Z., & Feher, L. (2018). Slovakia after the Introduction of the Euro (overview of the period 2009-2011). Hradec Economic Days: Double-Blind Peer-Reviewed Proceedings Part I. of the International Scientific Conference: January 30-31, 2018. Hradec Kralove: Univerzita Hradec Kralove, 439-446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maastrichti kriteriumok es teljesülesük. Retrieved from: [Link]
- Machova, R., Veghova, K. (2013). Az Euró bevezetesenek hatasa a gazdasag versenykepessegere Szlovakiaban. Zborník medzinarodnej vedeckej konferencie UJS – 2013: «Nove výzvy vo vede a vo vzdelavaní» Sekcia ekonomických vied. Komarno: Univerzita J. Selyeho, 391-422.
- Mihalcova, B., Gallo, P., & Lukac., J. (2020). Management of Innovations in Finance Education: Cluster Analysis for OECD Countries. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 235-244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MNB. (2001). A Magyar Nemzeti Bank 2001. evrol szóló üzleti jelentese es eves beszamolója. Retrieved from [Link]
- MTI-Eco. (2011). Bulgaria elhalasztja az ERM-2 tagsagról szóló targyalasok megkezdeset. Retrieved from[Link]
- NBS. Výmena slovenských bankoviek a slovenských pamätných mincí. Retrieved from [Link]
- Origo. (2012). Bulgaria lemondott az euró bevezeteserol. Retrieved from [Link]
- Papaspyrou, T. (2004). EMU strategies: Lessons from Greece in view of EU enlargement. Retrieved from [Link]
- Polasek, W., & Amplatz, C. (2003). The Maastricht Criteria and the Euro: Has the Convergence Continued? Journal of Economic Integration, 18(4), 661-688. [Google Scholar]
- Privatbankar. (2013). Majd akkor lesz roman euró, amikor magyar?. Retrieved from [Link]
- Rajnoha, R., Merkova, M., Dobroviс, J., & Rózsa, Z. (2018). Business performance management and FDI: Key differences between foreign and domestic-owned firms-A case of Slovakia. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 19(1), 42-62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Treaty on European Union. (1992). Retrieved from [Link]
- Verbeken, D., Rakiс, D. (2019). History of economic and monetary union. Retrieved from [Link]
- Vovchak O. D., Rudevska V. I., Pohorila O. V. (2018). Challenges of inflation targeting in Ukraine: establishing the mega-regulator. Financial and credit activities: problems of theory and practice, 1(24), P. 305-311. [CrossRef]
- Zestos, G. K., & Benedict, J. M. (2018). European Monetary Integration: A History. Encyclopedia of International Economics and Global Trade. [Google Scholar]
|