Knowledge Economy, Innovation and the Universities' Education Role in Saudi Arabia: A Study of Academicians’ Perspectives at the University of Hail

doi:10.21272/mmi.2023.3-015

Knowledge Economy, Innovation and the Universities’ Education Role in Saudi Arabia: A Study of Academicians’ Perspectives at the University of Hail

Murad Thomran1

, Ali Essa A. Alshammari1

University of Hail, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

* Corresponding author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2023.3-15

Pages: 163-175

Received: 09 May 2023

Revised: 30 August 2023

Accepted: 04 September 2023

Abstract

The labour market is witnessing a significant increase in the levels of demand to learn new skills in areas such as data science, artificial intelligence and machine learning, which are among the most prominent features of the new industrial revolution. Universities have a vital function in the knowledge economy and innovation, as they generate and share knowledge through research, education, and creativity. The knowledge economy (KE) and innovation are key drivers of economic growth, as they promote innovation, productivity, and competitiveness. It creates new industries and jobs that require highly skilled workers. Weakness and inadequacy of the educational and research system have been considered as one of the main issues in Saudi Arabia. The aim of this study is to identify the role of universities in the knowledge economy and innovation in Saudi Arabia from the perspective of academics at the University of Hail. To achieve the objective of this research, a cross-sectional explanatory and descriptive research design with a quantitative approach was adopted by the researchers. A sample size of 83 academicians was chosen using a simple random sampling procedure. The analysis method employed was structural equation modelling (SEM) with partial least squares (PLS). The adopted instrument for collecting the data were a survey. The questionnaire measures were based on a 5-point Likert scale. To measure the reliability and validity of the instruments, Cronbach’s alpha, composite reliability, and Fornell-Lacker criterion tests were conducted. The findings of the study revealed that educational curriculum, educational policy, infrastructure, and scientific research have a significant role in (KE) and innovation, whereas the results of teaching methods showed no significant role in (KE) and innovation. To remain competitive in the ever-changing economic landscape, policymakers in Saudi Arabian universities must prioritize curriculum design, infrastructure, teaching methods, policies, and skilled manpower while paying more attention to science, technology, and innovation. In addition, universities should focus on developing the skills of their graduates to meet the demands of the job market. This can be achieved by offering internships and apprenticeships, as well as providing training in soft skills such as communication, teamwork, and problem-solving.

Keyword: education; knowledge economy; innovation; policies; infrastructure; Saudi Arabia.

How to Cite: : Thomran, M., & Alshammari, A. A. (2023). Knowledge Economy, Innovation and the Universities’ Education Role in Saudi Arabia: A Study of Academicians’ Perspectives at the University of Hail. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 14(3), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2023.3-15

Abstract Views

PDF Downloads

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

Abel, J. R., & Deitz, R. (2011). The role of colleges and universities in building local human capital. Current issues in economics and finance, 17(6), 1. [Google Scholoar]

Ahmed, H. M., & Ahmed, Y. A. (2021). Constraints of youth entrepreneurs in Ethiopia. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 11(1), 337-346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Al Belooshi, J., & Al Ma’amari, S. (2020). The Skills of the KE Expected in the Future in the School Education in Oman: A Scientific Study by Using the Delphi Method. Journal of Educational and Psychological Studies [JEPS], 14(2), 229-249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Al-Hashimi, A., & Al-Azawi, F. (2009). KE and innovation and building the teacher. Al-Ein: University Book Center. [Google Scholar]

Al-Sayegh N. M. S. (2013). The Role Of The Knowledge Economy In The Development Of Saudi Universities And Obstacles Activated From The Viewpoint Of Heads Of Departments. International interdisciplinary journal of education, (2) 9, 860-869. [Link]

Arab Knowledge Index. (2015). Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum Foundation and the Regional Bureau for Arab States UNDP.

Asongu, S. A. (2014). KE and financial sector competition in African countries. African Development Review, 26(2), 333-346.[Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Awajneh, A. M. H., Sabbah, S. S. M., & Naser, I. A. S. (2017). Concepts and Roles of Faculty in the Palestinian Universities in the Light of Knowledge Economy. World Journal of Education, 7(6), 80-89. [Google Scholar] []

Barro, R. (2005). Economic Growth across Countries. In M. Miles (Ed.), The Road to Prosperity . Heritage Books.

Bhattacherjee, A., Toleman, M., Rowling, S., Frederiks, A., & Andersen, N. (2019). Social Science Research: Principles, Methods and Practices. [Google Scholar]

Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills, 17-66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Bramwell, A., & Wolfe, D. A. (2008). Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of Waterloo. Research policy, 37(8), 1175-1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Brislin, R.W. (1980). Cross-Cultural Research Methods. In: Altman, I., Rapoport, A., Wohlwill, J.F. (eds) Environment and Culture. Human Behavior and Environment, vol 4. Springer, Boston, MA. [CrossRef]

Carstensen, M. B., & Emmenegger, P. (2023). Education as social policy: New tensions in maturing knowledge economies. Social Policy & Administration, 57(2), 109-121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Castells, M., & Cardoso, G. (2005). The network society: From knowledge to policy. Center for Transatlantic Relations.[Google Scholar]

Creswell, J. W. (2006). Research design, quantitative and mixed approaches (2ndEd): London, Sage Publication Inc

Drucker, P. F. (1966). The Effective Executive: The definitive guide to Getting the Right Things Done. New York: Harper Business Essentials.

Durazzi, N. (2021). Engineering the expansion of HE: High skills, advanced manufacturing, and the KE. Regulation & Governance, 17(1), 121-141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Durazzi, N., Pavolini, E., & Battaglia, F. (2023). The multi‐dimensional politics of education policy in the KE: The case of Italy (1996–2008). Social Policy & Administration, 57(2), 144-157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Fleckenstein, T., Lee, S. C., & Mohun Himmelweit, S. (2023). Dualization, education and the KE: Comparing Germany and South Korea. Social Policy & Administration, 57(2), 158-171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Green-Pedersen, C., & Jensen, C. (2019). Electoral competition and the welfare state. West European Politics, 42(4), 803-823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Hair Jr, J., Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications. [Google Scholar]

Hall, P. A. (2020). How growth strategies evolve in the developed democracies. Growth and welfare in the global economy: how growth regimes evolve, 57-97. [Google Scholar]

Hassel, A., Palier, B., & Avlijas, S. (2020). The pursuit of growth. Growth regimes, growth strategies and welfare reforms in advanced capitalist economies. Stato e mercato, 40(1), 41-77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Heng, L. H., Othman, N. F. M., Rasli, A. M., & Iqbal, M. J. (2012). Fourth pillar in the transformation of production economy to KE. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 530-536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research policy, 41(2), 251-261. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]

Hvidt, M. (2015). The state and the KE in the Gulf: Structural and motivational challenges. The Muslim World, 105(1), 24-45.[Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Ioana, M. I., Anda, M. I., Ioan, P., & Bianca, R. A. (2015). The importance of community involvement in research and innovation between 2014–2020. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 619-622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Kefela, G. T. (2010). KE and society has become a vital commodity to countries. International NGO Journal, 5(7), 160-166. [Google Scholar]

Kothari, C.R. (2004) Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. 2nd Edition, New Age International Publishers, New Delhi. [Google Scholar]

Levy, C., & Hopkins, L. (2010). Shaping up for innovation: are we delivering the right skills for the 2020 KE?. The Work Foundation. London. [Google Scholar]

Mathew, A. O., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2015). Effect of incentives on knowledge sharing and learning–Evidence from the Indian IT sector. International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, 9(3), 769-774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Moiseev, V. V., Karelina, M. Y., Komarova, O. A., & Karelina, E. A. (2019). HE as a factor in the development of the KE and innovation in Russia. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 322, 7-13. [CrossRef]

Muzeyin, J. R., Ahmed, H. M. S., Awoke, Y., Ferejo, M. N., Abebaw, T., Beyene, T. Y., & Amde, S. J. (2022). Exploring determinants of employee engagement in the emerging market [Special issue]. Corporate & Business Strategy Review, 3(2), 238–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

OECD. (2007). Understanding the social outcomes of learning. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from [Link]

Park, S. Y. (2013). The political and institutional basis of Korea’s skill formation system. Journal of Education and Work, 26(3), 291-308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Ramadan E., (2015). The degree of availability of knowledge economy skills among students of the Faculty of Social Sciences at Imam Muhammad bin Saud Islamic University from the point of view of faculty members and students. Research the publication of the Jordanian Journal of Educational Sciences, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan 11, 219-237. [Link]

Ramady, M. A., (2010). The Saudi Arabian Economy:Policies, Achievements, and Challenges. International Economics, 32-41. [CrossRef]

Salem, M. I. (2014). The role of universities in building a KE in KSA. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 13(5), 1047-1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Saunders, M., Lewis, P. H. I. L. I. P., & Thornhill, A. D. R. I. A. N. (2007). Research methods. Business Students 4th edition Pearson Education Limited, England, 6(3), 1-268. [Google Scholar]

Seman, A. A., Ahmed, H., Refera, M. K., Amde, S. J., Thomran, M., & Ahmed, Y. A. (2022). Assessing the effect of work-life balance initiatives on organizational citizenship behaviour. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 13(4), 207-217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Weber, A. S. (2011). The role of education in knowledge economies in developing countries. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2589-2594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Introduction to communities of practice: A brief overview of the concept and its uses. Retrieved from [Link]

Winther, L. (2019). Urban KE. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies, 1-6. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]

Wolfe, D. A. (2005). Innovation and research funding: the role of government support. Taking public universities seriously, 316-340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Yigitcanlar, T. (2014). Position paper: benchmarking the performance of global and emerging knowledge cities. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(12), 5549-5559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. In Applied Social Research Methods Series (Vol. 5). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]

View articles in other formats