Managing the Stable Development of Manufacturing Systems under Decentralization

doi:10.21272/mmi.2023.4-011

Managing the Stable Development of Manufacturing Systems under Decentralization.

Anatoly Usov¹ , Maksym Kunitsyn¹^,*, Eleonora Zabarna ¹ , Liubov Niekrasova ¹

Odesа Polytechnic National University, Ukraine

* Corresponding author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2023.4-11

Pages: 151-165

Received: 01 September 2023

Revised: 15 November 2023

Accepted: 10 December 2023

Abstract

This article provides an overview of the arguments and counterarguments involved in identifying the state of an enterprise, assessing its functional efficiency, and optimizing its target functions while implementing management tasks. The decentralization of enterprises empowers them to adapt to specific territorial needs. However, it also introduces an element of instability that can be disconcerting. The primary objective of this research is to develop a scientific and methodological approach to modelling the management system of the development of manufacturing enterprises under decentralization. The systematization of literary sources and approaches to the problem of managing the development of manufacturing enterprises reveals that each level of analysis of the state of the enterprise and assessment of its development dynamics and problem situation corresponds to the aggregate set of assessments, which includes both individual indicators and their various groups. At its core lies the crucial recognition of production systems’ (PS) state as a pivotal parameter influencing the very fabric of UTC development. The model employs a powerful vector functional approach, allowing for a multi-dimensional assessment of an enterprise’s state. The model translates into a tangible metric, empowering informed decision-making and targeted interventions. The relevance of this scientific problem is that the management process of enterprise development under decentralization needs to be more structured and less accidental. There is a need to manage this process to survive and develop in an aggressive market environment. Optimal management of production systems as discrete matrix objects provides an opportunity to consider the functioning of each of them depending on the state of the others at time t of their production to time t+1, which is associated with their further development in a decentralized environment. The results of the research can be helpful for the development of systems for monitoring and strategic management of the development processes of manufacturing enterprises under decentralization.

Keyword: enterprise; company; functioning; production system; state; united territorial communities.

How to Cite: Usov, A., Kunitsyn, M., Zabarna, E., & Niekrasova, L. (2023). Managing the Stable Development of Manufacturing Systems under Decentralization. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 14(4), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2023.4-11

Abstract Views

PDF Downloads

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

Aslim, E. G., & Neyapti, B. (2017). Optimal fiscal decentralization: Redistribution and welfare implications. Economic Modelling, 61, 224–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Baskaran, T., Feld, L. P., & Schnellenbach, J. (2016). Fiscal federalism, decentralization, and economic growth: A meta-analysis: fiscal federalism and economic growth. Economic Inquiry, 54(3), 1445–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Bekabil, U. T. (2021). Public policy and business strategy for industrial development. Bod Third Party Titles. [Google Scholar]

Boadway, R., & Dougherty, S. (2019). Decentralization in a globalized world: Consequences and opportunities. In J. Kim & S. Dougherty (Eds.), Fiscal Decentralization and Inclusive Growth in Asia (pp. 17–26). OECD. [Google Scholar]

Van‘t Wout, T., Celikyilmaz, G., & Arguello, C. (2021). Policy analysis of Nationally Determined Contributions in the Europe and Central Asia region: 2021. Food & Agriculture Org.. [Google Scholar]

Chen, A., & Groenewold, N. (2013). The national and regional effects of fiscal decentralization in China. The Annals of Regional Science, 51(3), 731–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Crofton, F. S. (2000). Educating for sustainability: Opportunities in undergraduate engineering. Journal of Cleaner Production, 8(5), 397–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

de Villiers, C., Rouse, P., & Kerr, J. (2016). A new conceptual model of influences driving sustainability based on case evidence of the integration of corporate sustainability management control and reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Decentralization in Ukraine. (n.d.). [Link]

Dirks, K. T., Lewicki, R. J., & Zaheer, A. (2009). Repairing relationships within and between organizations: Building a conceptual foundation. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 68–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Durmanov, A., Bartosova, V., Drobyazko, S., Melnyk, O., & Fillipov, V. (2019). Mechanism to ensure sustainable development of enterprises in the information space. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(2), 1377–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Fiksel, J. (2012). A systems view of sustainability: The triple value model. Environmental Development, 2, 138–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Freidson, E., & Rist, R. (2020). Program evaluation and the management of government. Routledge. [Google Scholar]

Hamrol, A. (2018). A new look at some aspects of maintenance and improvement of production processes. In Management and Production Engineering Review (Vol. 9, Issue No 1). Production Engineering Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Polish Association for Production Management. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Judgment of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine of 13.07.2001 № 11-rp/2001. (n.d.). [Link]

Kallrath, J. (2012). Algebraic modelling systems: Modelling and solving real world optimization problems. Springer Science & Business Media. [Google Scholar]

Kravchenko, V. I., Bondareva, L. V., Bykov, R. Yu., Danilova, L. V., & Myrna, O. V. (2021). Financial decentralization as a key factor in the socioeconomic development of territorial entities. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 9(3), 477–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Lankoski, L. (2016). Alternative conceptions of sustainability in a business context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 847–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Leone, P., Porretta, P., & Vellella, M. (2018). Measuring and managing operational risk: An integrated approach. Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar]

Lozano, R. (2015). A holistic perspective on corporate sustainability drivers: A holistic perspective on corporate sustainability drivers. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(1), 32–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Moore, S. B., & Manring, S. L. (2009). Strategy development in small and medium-sized enterprises for sustainability and increased value creation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(2), 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Navickas, V., & Malakauskaitė, A. (2009). The impact of clusterization on the development of small and medium‐sized enterprise (SME) sector. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 10(3), 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Nelson, R. R. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]

Olszewska, B., & Piwoni-Krzeszowska, E. (2014). Factors influencing company relations with market stakeholders, in the face of crises in company development. Management and Production Engineering Review, 5(2), 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Onyemelukwe, C. C. (2005). The science of economic development and growth: The theory of factor proportions. M.E. Sharpe. [Google Scholar]

Rodchenko, L., Goncharenko, O., Koval, O., Tarasov, I., Nemchenko, H., & Tkachuk, T. (2019). Optimization of innovation projects according to criteria of time and resource constraints. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3), 1431-1434. [Google Scholar]

Shin, Y. C., & Xu, C. (2017). Intelligent systems: Modelling, optimization, and control. CRC Press. [Google Scholar]

Taurino, T. (2018). Using collaborative management in industrial clusters – Case study of Italian energy cluster. Management and Production Engineering Review, 9, 138–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Van Tulder, R., & van Mil, E. (2022). Principles of Sustainable Business: Frameworks for Corporate Action on the SDGs. Taylor & Francis. [Google Scholar]

Usov, A. V., Niekrasova, L. A., & Dasić, P. V. (2020). Management of development of manufacturing enterprises in decentralization conditions. Management and Production Engineering Review, 11(4). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

View articles in other formats