Зміст |
Автори:
Канан Ериіжит, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4326-3922 Університет Хаджеттепе (Туреччина)
Сторінки: 106-119
Мова: Англійська
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2020.3-08
Отримано:
Прийнято:
Опубліковано:
Завантажити: |
Перегляди: |
Завантаження: |
|
|
|
Розширена анотація українською мовою
Статтю присвячено аналізуу наукового доробку у сфері активізації інноваційної активнності споживачів. Головною метою є визначення основнх патернів наукових досліджень щодо інноваційної активності споживачів із використанням бібліометричного аналізу наукових публікацій з даної проблематики. Актуальність даної роботи полягає у заповненні прогалин попередніх вузько спеціалізвоаних та застарілих напрацювань. Детерміновану вибірку даних сформовано на основі 118 наукових статей, опублікованих за останні десять років у журналах, що індексуються базою даних Web of Science. У результаті проведеного контент-аналізу досліджувані статті згруповано за п’ятьма тематиками: 1) наслідки інноваційної активнності споживачів; 2) передумови активізації інноваційної активнності споживачів; 3) управління інноваційною активнностю споживачів; 4) посередницька роль інноваційної активнності споживачів; 5) оцінювання інноваційної активнності споживачів. Результати дослідження дають підстави стверджувати, що найбільшу частку статей присвячено дослідженню переваг від підвищення інноваційної активнності споживачів. Автороммм відмічено, що випуск нового продукту є найбільш поширеним результатом підвищення рівня інноваційної активнності споживачів. У свою чергу, дещо меншою є частка досліджень щодо ефективності управління інноваційною активністю споживачів. У ході дослідження встановлено, що науковий напрям щодо оцінювання рівння інноваційної активнності споживачів є менш досліджуваним. Враховуючи отримані результати, автором визначено, що дослідження посередницької ролі інноваційної активнності споживачів не були актуальними протягом останніх десяти років. При цьому авторомвідмічено, що інноваційна активність споживачів відіграє ключову роль у процесі прийняття їх рішень. Крім того, тематика інноваційної активнності споживачів розглядалася у роботах, присвячених питанням поведінки споживачів.
Ключові слова: споживча інноваційність, контент-аналіз, літературний огляд, наслідки споживчої інноваційності..
Класифікація JEL: M10, M30, M31.
Цитувати як: Eryigit, C.. (2020). Consumer innovativeness: a literature review Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 106-119. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2020.3-08
Ця стаття публікуються за ліцензією Creative Commons Attribution International License
Список використаних джерел
- Abbas, M., & Mir, N. Q. (2020). Exploring factors influencing consumer resistance to innovation by applying consumer resistance theory. SMART Journal of Business Management Studies,16(1), 64-72. [Google Scholar]. [CrossRef].
- Abbas, M., Zaman, U., Ahmad, J., Nawaz, M. S., & Ahraf, M. (2019). Diffusion of mobile banking in Pakistan. SMART Journal of Business Management Studies, 15(1), 10. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
- Adapa, S., Fazal-e-Hasan, S. M., Makam, S. B., Azeem, M. M., & Mortimer, G. (2020). Examining the antecedents and consequences of perceived shopping value through smart retail technology. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aldahdouh, T. Z., Nokelainen, P., & Korhonen, V. (2020). Technology and Social Media Usage in Higher Education: The Influence of Individual Innovativeness. SAGE Open, 10(1). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Jundi, S. A., Shuhaiber, A., & Augustine, R. (2019). Effect of consumer innovativeness on new product purchase intentions through learning process and perceived value. Cogent Business and Management, 6(1). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashraf, R. U., Hou, F., & Ahmad, W. (2019). Understanding Continuance Intention to Use Social Media in China: The Roles of Personality Drivers, Hedonic Value, and Utilitarian Value. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35(13), 1216–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartels, J., & Reinders, M. J. (2010). Social identification, social representations, and consumer innovativeness in an organic food context: A cross-national comparison. Food Quality and Preference, 21(4), 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartels, J., & Reinders, M. J. (2011). Consumer innovativeness and its correlates : A propositional inventory for future research. Journal of Business Research, 64(6), 601–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswas, A., & Roy, M. (2015). Leveraging factors for sustained green consumption behavior based on consumption value perceptions: Testing the structural model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 95, 332–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byun, S. E., & Sternquist, B. (2011). Fast fashion and in-store hoarding: The drivers, moderator, and consequences. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 29(3), 187–201. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
- Caricati, L., & Raimondi, M. (2015). The motivated consumer innovativeness scale: Initial Italian validation. TPM – Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 22(3), 363–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakrabarti, S. (2010). Factors influencing organic food purchase in India – expert survey insights. British Food Journal, 112(8), 902–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, C. H., Leigh, R., Shu, S. T., & Ma, S. C. (2019). Fitness innovativeness, duration of stay, and revisit behavior: a moderation relationship. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 20(4), 634–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chao, C. W., Reid, M., & Hung, Y. C. (2016). Vicarious innovativeness or vicarious learning: The role of existing vicarious innovativeness in new product purchase intentions. Australasian Marketing Journal, 24(1), 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chauhan, V., Yadav, R., & Choudhary, V. (2019). Analyzing the impact of consumer innovativeness and perceived risk in internet banking adoption: A study of Indian consumers. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37(1), 323–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W. C., & Fiore, A. M. (2017). Factors affecting Taiwanese consumers’ responses toward pop-up retail. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 29(2), 370–392. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
- Cheng, Y. H., & Chen, S. F. (2016). Adoption forecasting of multipurpose smart cards in transit systems. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Technology, Planning, and Operations,20(4), 363–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheung, M. L., Chau, K. Y., Sum Lam, M. H., Tse, G., Ho, K. Y., Flint, S. W., …& Lee, K. Y. (2019). Examining consumers’ adoption of wearable healthcare technology: The role of health attributes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(13). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, W., Im, M., Song, M. R., & Park, J. (2019). Psychological and behavioral factors affecting electric vehicle adoption and satisfaction: A comparative study of early adopters in China and Korea. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 76, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clark, R. A., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2006). Interpersonal influence and consumer innovativeness. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(1), 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, F., Lin, D., & Qu, H. (2018). The impact of perceived security and consumer innovativeness on e-loyalty in online travel shopping. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 35(6), 819–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, D. F., Golicic, S. L., & Boerstler, C. N. (2011). Benefits and challenges of conducting multiple methods research in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(3), 467–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Oliveira Santini, F., Ladeira, W. J., & Sampaio, C. H. (2018). Tourists’ perceived value and destination revisit intentions: The moderating effect of domain-specific innovativeness. International Journal of Tourism Research, 20(3), 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2006). Using qualitative research synthesis to build an actionable knowledge base. Management Decision, 44(2), 213–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eren-Erdogmus, I., Akgun, I., & Arda, E. (2018). Drivers of successful luxury fashion brand extensions: cases of complement and transfer extensions. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 22(4), 476–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, F., & Elliott, M. (2013). The moderating effect of perceived product innovativeness and product knowledge on new product adoption: An integrated model. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 21(3), 257–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldsmith, E. R., & Hofacker, C. F. (1991). Measuring Consumer Innovativeness. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 19(3), 209–221. [Google Scholar]
- Goldsmith, R. E., & Foxall, G. R. (2003). The measurement of innovativeness. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The International Handbook On Innovation (pp. 321–330). London: Pergamon. [Google Scholar]
- Gumel, A. M. (2018). Does Consumer Innovativeness Matter? Predicting Customer Behaviour of A New Financial Architecture. Turkish Journal of Islamic Economics, 5(2), 145–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gurtner, S., & Soyez, K. (2016). How to catch the generation Y: Identifying consumers of ecological innovations among youngsters. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 106, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hammersley, M. (2001). On «systematic» reviews of research literatures: a «narrative» response to Evans & Benefield. British Educational Research Journal, 27(5), 543–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Handarkho, Y. D., & Harjoseputro, Y. (2019). Intention to adopt mobile payment in physical stores: Individual switching behavior perspective based on Push–Pull–Mooring (PPM) theory. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(2), 285–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heidenreich, S., Spieth, P., & Petschnig, M. (2017). Ready, Steady, Green: Examining the Effectiveness of External Policies to Enhance the Adoption of Eco-Friendly Innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(3), 343–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, J. C., Lin, P. H., & Hsieh, P. C. (2017). The effect of consumer innovativeness on perceived value and continuance intention to use smartwatch. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, X., Soutar, G. N., & Brown, A. (2004). Measuring new product success: An empirical investigation of Australian SMEs. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(2), 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hur, W. M., Yoo, J. J., & Chung, T. L. (2012). The consumption values and consumer innovativeness on convergence products. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(5), 688–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, J., & Griffiths, M. A. (2017). Share more, drive less: Millennials value perception and behavioral intent in using collaborative consumption services. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 34(2), 132–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, J., Lee, J. S., & Kim, H. (2019). Perceived innovativeness of drone food delivery services and its impacts on attitude and behavioral intentions: The moderating role of gender and age. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 81, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, T., Chung, N., & Leue, M. C. (2015). The determinants of recommendations to use augmented reality technologies: The case of a Korean theme park. Tourism Management, 49, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaushik, A. K., & Rahman, Z. (2014). Perspectives and dimensions of consumer innovativeness: A literature review and future agenda. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 26(3), 239-263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaushik, A. K., & Rahman, Z. (2016). Self-service innovativeness scale: introduction, development, and validation of scale. Service Business, 10(4), 799–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelley, J. B., & Alden, D. L. (2016). Online brand community: through the eyes of Self-Determination Theory. Internet Research, 26(4), 790–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, W., Benedetto, D., Anthony, C., & Hunt, J. M. (2012). Consumer innovativeness and consideration set as antecedents of the consumer decision process for highly globalized new products: a three-country empirical study. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 22(1), 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, W., Di Benedetto, C., A., & Hunt, J. M. (2017). Consumer innovativeness and international consumer behavior: Comments and extensions. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 27(3), 184–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, W., Hunt, J. M., & Lancioni, R. A. (2015). Consumer innovativeness: a domain-specific perspective of information acquisition and choice. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 25(1), 17–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y. H., & Kim, Y. K. (2017). A technology-fashion collaborative product: Its impact on consumer attitudes and purchase intention. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 8(4), 283–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konuk, F. A. (2018). Antecedents of pregnant women’s purchase intentions and willingness to pay a premium for organic food. British Food Journal, 120(7), 1561–1573. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
- Konuk, F. A. (2019). Consumers’ willingness to buy and willingness to pay for fair trade food: The influence of consciousness for fair consumption, environmental concern, trust and innovativeness. Food Research International, 120, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krey, N., Chuah, S. H. W., Ramayah, T., & Rauschnabel, P. A. (2019). How functional and emotional ads drive smartwatch adoption: The moderating role of consumer innovativeness and extraversion. Internet Research, 29(3), 578–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuester, S., Feurer, S., Schuhmacher, M. C., & Reinartz, D. (2015). Comparing the incomparable? How consumers judge the price fairness of new products. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32(3), 272–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lassar, W. M., Manolis, C., & Lassar, S. S. (2005). The relationship between consumer innovativeness, personal characteristics, and online banking adoption. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 23(2), 176–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H. C., Wang, C. Y., & Hong, R. S. (2013). The factors influencing adolescents’ purchase intentions of state-of-the-art cell phones in Taiwan. Service Business, 7(4), 713–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K., & Mano, H. (2014). Beyond simple innovativeness: A hierarchical continuum and thinking and feeling processing modes. Social Behavior and Personality, 42(4), 597–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S. Y. (2014). Examining the factors that influence early adopters’ smartphone adoption: The case of college students. Telematics and Informatics, 31(2), 308–318. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
- Lee, S., & Johnson, Z. S. (2017). The effect of new product design and innovation on South Korean consumer’s willingness to buy. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 29(1), 98–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S., Lee, J. H., & Garrett, T. C. (2013). A study of the attitude toward convergent products: A focus on the consumer perception of functionalities. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(1), 123–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, W. J., & Shin, S. (2018). Effects of product smartness on satisfaction: Focused on the perceived characteristics of smartphones. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 13(2), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, G., Zhang, R., & Wang, C. (2015). The role of product originality, usefulness and motivated consumer innovativeness in new product adoption intentions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(2), 214–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, K., Rollins, J., & Yan, E. (2018). Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: A selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis. Scientometrics, 115(1), 1-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X. (2013). Innovativeness, personal initiative, news affinity and news utility as predictors of the use of mobile phones as news devices. Chinese Journal of Communication, 6(3), 350–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C., & Nguyen, C. (2011). Exploring E-Payment Adoption in Vietnam and Taiwan. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 51(4), 41–52. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X., & Wayne Xu, W. (2019). Adoption of ride-sharing apps by Chinese taxi drivers and its implication for the equality and wellbeing in the sharing economy. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(1), 7–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopez-Bonilla, J. M., & Lopez-Bonilla, L. M. (2012). Sensation-Seeking Profiles and Personal Innovativeness in Information Technology. Social Science Computer Review, 30(4), 434–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maalouf, J. T., Abi Aad, A., & El Masri, K. (2020). Competitiveness of sharing economy companies in emerging markets. Competitiveness Review. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahdzan, N. S., Zainudin, R., & Au, S. F. (2017). The adoption of Islamic banking services in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 8(3), 496–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menidjel, C., Benhabib, A., & Bilgihan, A. (2017). Examining the moderating role of personality traits in the relationship between brand trust and brand loyalty. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 26(6), 631–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Midgley, F. D., & Dowling, G. R. (1978). Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morosan, C., & DeFranco, A. (2016). Modeling guests’ intentions to use mobile apps in hotels: The roles of personalization, privacy, and involvement. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(9), 1968–1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morosan, C., & DeFranco, A. (2019). Co-creation of value using hotel interactive technologies: examining intentions and conversion. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morton, C., Anable, J., & Nelson, J. D. (2016). Exploring consumer preferences towards electric vehicles: The influence of consumer innovativeness. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 18, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muller, P., Schmitt, J. B., & Kramer, B. (2018). Of Rules and Role Models: How Perceptions of Parents’ Mediation and Modelling Contribute to Individuals’ Media Innovativeness. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 62(4), 692–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murata, K., Arias-Oliva, M., & Pelegrín-Borondo, J. (2019). Cross-cultural study about cyborg market acceptance: Japan versus Spain. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 25(3), 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nikou, S. (2019). Factors driving the adoption of smart home technology: An empirical assessment. Telematics and Informatics, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Norskov, S., Chrysochou, P., & Milenkova, M. (2015). The impact of product innovation attributes on brand equity. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 32(4), 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OECD (2019). Highlights from OECD Innovation Indicators 2019. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/innovation-indicators-2019-highlights.pdf
- Pantano, E., Priporas, C. V., & Foroudi, P. (2019). Innovation starts at the storefront: Modelling consumer behaviour towards storefront windows enriched with innovative technologies. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 47(2), 202–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, J., & Gunn, F. (2016). The Impact of Image Dimensions toward Online Consumers’ Perceptions of Product Aesthetics. Human Factors and Ergonomics In Manufacturing, 26(5), 595–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, K., & Lee, K. (2016). Is green product purchasing an innovative or conspicuous behavior? Social Behavior and Personality, 44(1), 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, N. G., & Tran, H. T. T. (2019). Making the world a better place by making better products: Eco-friendly consumer innovativeness and the adoption of eco-innovations. European Journal of Marketing, 53(8), 1546–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., & Duffy, S. (2006). Methods, Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. ESRC Programme,15(1), 47–71. [Google Scholar]
- Quoquab, F., Mohammad, J., Yasin, N. M., & Abdullah, N. L. (2018). Antecedents of switching intention in the mobile telecommunications industry: A partial least square approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 30(4), 1087–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ratten, V. (2015). International consumer attitudes toward cloud computing: A social cognitive theory and technology acceptance model perspective. Thunderbird International Business Review, 57(3), 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roehrich, G. (2004). Consumer innovativeness Concepts and measurements. Journal of business research, 57(6), 671–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
- Rohm, A. J., Gao, T. T., Sultan, F., & Pagani, M. (2012). Brand in the hand: A cross-market investigation of consumer acceptance of mobile marketing. Business Horizons, 55(5), 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- San-Martin, S., & Lopez-Catalan, B. (2013). How can a mobile vendor get satisfied customers? Industrial Management & Data Systems, 113(2), 156–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schillo, R. S., Persaud, A., & Schillo, S. R. (2017). Purchasing organic products: role of social context and consumer innovativeness. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 35(1), 130–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schweitzer, F., & Van den Hende, E. A. (2016). To Be or Not to Be in Thrall to the March of Smart Products. 33(10), 830–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaikh, I. M., Qureshi, M. A., Noordin, K., Shaikh, J. M., Khan, A., & Shahbaz, M. S. (2020). Acceptance of Islamic financial technology (FinTech) banking services by Malaysian users: an extension of technology acceptance model. Foresight. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, G., Bu, H., Ping, Y., Liu, M. T., Wang, Y., Tingchi Liu, M., & Wang, Y. (2016). Customer relationship investment and relationship strength: evidence from insurance industry in China. Journal of Services Marketing, 30(2), 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simmons, G., Grinstein, A., & Palmer, M. (2017). Branding strategies for high technology products: The effects of consumer and product innovativeness. Journal of Business Research, 70, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slade, E. L., Dwivedi, Y. K., Piercy, N. C., & Williams, M. D. (2015). Modeling Consumers’ Adoption Intentions of Remote Mobile Payments in the United Kingdom: Extending UTAUT with Innovativeness, Risk, and Trust. Psychology and Marketing, 32(8), 860–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thakur, A., & Jasrai, L. (2018). A Logit Model to Predict Innovativeness among Mobile Telecom Service Users. Global Business Review, 19(3_suppl), S54–S71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Oorschot, J. A., Hofman, E., & Halman, J. I. (2018). A bibliometric review of the innovation adoption literature. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 134, 1-21.[Google Scholar][CrossRef]
- Vyncke, P. (2002). Lifestyle segmentation: From attitudes, interests and opinions, to values aesthetic styles, life visions and media preferences. European Journal of Communication, 17(4), 445–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waheed, M., Klobas, J. E., & Kaur, K. (2017). The importance of actual use in defining and measuring innovative behaviour: Comparison of e-book reader users and non-users. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 49(4), 368–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B., Gao, Y., Su, Z., & Li, J. (2019). The structural equation analysis of perceived product innovativeness upon brand loyalty based on the computation of reliability and validity analysis. Cluster Computing, 22, 10207–10217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q., Dacko, S., & Gad, M. (2008). Factors Influencing Consumers’ Evaluation and Adoption Intention of Really-New Products or Services: Prior Knowledge, Innovativeness and Timing of Product Evaluation. 35th Annual Conference of the Association-for-Consumer-Research, 416–422. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, W. (2014). Hospitality consumers’ innovativeness: A qualitative study. Advances in Hospitality and Leisure, 10, 37–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y., So, K. K. F., & Sparks, B. A. (2017). Technology Readiness and Customer Satisfaction with Travel Technologies: A Cross-Country Investigation. Journal of Travel Research, 56(5), 563–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z., & Hou, Y. (2017). The effect of perceived risk on information search for innovative products and services: the moderating role of innate consumer innovativeness. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 34(3), 241–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|