Marketing and Management of Innovations

ISSN (print) – 2218-4511 

ISSN (online) – 2227-6718

Реєстр суб’єктів у сфері медіа, Ідентифікатор у реєстрі:

R30-01179, Рішення від 31 серпня 2023 року, № 759

Мова видання: англійська 

Журнал виходить щоквартально (березень, червень, вересень і грудень) 

Бізнес-модель: Golden Open Access | APC Policy

Publisher & Founder:

logo_longENG

Головний редактор            Редколегія

Олексій Люльов

Сумський державний університет | Україна

Диверсифікація менеджменту компанії та її успіх: роль соціалізації ТОП-менеджменту

Тхуй Зунг Т. Фам 1,  , Ті Хуонг Джіанг Во 2,  , Сон Тунг Нгуєн 1, , Дуй Бінь Лионг 3,*, ,  
  1. Міжнародна бізнес-школа, Університет економіки Хошиміну, В’єтнам 
  2. Університет промисловості та торгівлі Хошиміну, В’єтнам
  3. Університет Сайгона, В’єтнам 

     * Corresponding author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2024.4-08

Pages: 99–112

Received: 8 April 2024

Revised: 20 December 2024

Accepted: 26 December 2024

Abstract

Хоча виконавчі команди відіграють значну роль у результативності організацій, важливо детально дослідити унікальний вплив характеристик окремих членів команди на результати діяльності компаній. Спираючись на численні теорії, що застосовуються у дослідженнях вищого управлінського складу (TMT), метою цієї статті є визначення впливу таких факторів, як вік, гендер та культурне походження, на результати компаній. Крім того, наше дослідження підсилює зв’язок між різноманітністю та корпоративними результатами, включаючи соціалізацію TMT як модератор, що впливає на взаємозв’язок між характеристиками команди та ефективністю компаній. У статті використано кількісний метод, що базується на аналізі даних 661 публічно зареєстрованої IT-компанії в США, які діяли у 2016 році. Після початкової обробки даних виключено 153 компанії, які мали менше трьох членів у раді директорів або нульовий показник культурного різноманіття, а також 66 компаній із рентабельністю активів, нижчою за встановлений мінімум. Регресійний аналіз було проведено для решти 442 компаній, використовуючи дані про ефективність із глобальної бази даних OSIRIS.   Результати дослідження показують, що гендерний поділ у TMT є основним фактором, що позитивно впливає на результати компанії, за ним слідують вік та культурне різноманіття. Це дослідження розширює літературу про зв’язок між вищим управлінським складом і результативністю організацій. Крім того, виявлено, що соціалізація відіграє ключову модераторську роль у взаємозв’язках між гендерною різноманітністю TMT, віковою різноманітністю та результативністю компаній. За результатами дослідження сформовано практичні рекомендації для менеджерів та політиків щодо визначення пріоритетів, пов’язаних із характеристиками керівників, враховуючи різні перспективи, зумовлені віком, статтю та національним походженням членів команди. У той час як більшість досліджень зосереджуються на визначенні основних чинників та їхнього впливу, ця стаття підтверджує зв’язок між різноманітністю та ефективністю функціонування компаній, включаючи соціалізацію команди. Встановлено, що переваги різноманітності можуть бути максимізовані через ефективну співпрацю між керівниками, мінімізуючи конфлікти, що свідчить про те, як організації можуть краще формувати ролі членів ради директорів. 

Keywords: ТОП-менеджмент; культурне різноманіття; гендерна різноманітність; вікова різноманітність; соціалізація. 

How to Cite: Pham, T.-D. T., Vo, T. H. G., Nguyen, S.-T., & Luong, D. B. (2024). Diverse Leadership and Firm Success: The Role of Top Management Socialisation. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 15(4), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2024.4-08

Abstract Views

PDF Downloads

ccbyThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

  1. Abdullah, S. N., & Ismail, K. N. I. K. (2016). Women directors, family ownership and earnings management in Malaysia. Asian Review of Accounting, 24(4), 525-550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Aboramadan, M. (2021). Top management teams characteristics and firms performance: literature review and avenues for future research. International Journal of Organisational Analysis, 29(3), 603-628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of financial economics, 94(2), 291-309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ali, M., & Konrad, A. M. (2017). Antecedents and consequences of diversity and equality management systems: The importance of gender diversity in the TMT and lower to middle management. European Management Journal, 35(4), 440-453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ali, M., Ng, Y. L., & Kulik, C. T. (2014). Board age and gender diversity: A test of competing linear and curvilinear predictions. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 497-512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Allison, P. D. (1978). Measures of inequality. American sociological review, 865-880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Athanassiou, N., & Nigh, D. (2000). Internationalisation, tacit knowledge and the top management teams of MNCs. Journal of international business studies, 31(3), 471-487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Attah‐Boakye, R., Costanzo, L., Guney, Y., & Rodgers, W. (2021). The effects of top management team strategic cognition on corporate financial health and value: An interactive multidimensional approach. The European Journal of Finance, 29, 1461–1492. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
  9. Banalieva, E. R., & Dhanaraj, C. (2013). Home-region orientation in international expansion strategies. Journal of international business studies, 44(2), 89-116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?. Strategic management journal, 10(S1), 107-124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Barkema, H. G., & Shvyrkov, O. (2007). Does top management team diversity promote or hamper foreign expansion? Strategic Management Journal, 28(7), 663-680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Barney, J. B., & Wright, P. M. (1998). On becoming a strategic partner: The role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage. Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management, 37(1), 31-46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Belenzon, S., Shamshur, A., & Zarutskie, R. (2019). CEO’s age and the performance of closely held firms. Strategic Management Journal. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bell, S. T., Villado, A. J., Lukasik, M. A., Belau, L., & Briggs, A. L. (2011). Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of management, 37(3), 709-743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bengtsson, M., Raza-Ullah, T., & Srivastava, M. K. (2020). Looking different vs thinking differently: Impact of TMT diversity on coopetition capability. Long Range Planning, 53(1), 101857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Biga-Diambeidou, M., Bruna, M. G., Dang, R., & Houanti, L. H. (2021). Does gender diversity among new venture team matter for R&D intensity in technology-based new ventures? Evidence from a field experiment. Small business economics, 56, 1205-1220. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
  17. Brixy, U., Brunow, S., & D’Ambrosio, A. (2020). The unlikely encounter: Is ethnic diversity in start-ups associated with innovation?. Research Policy, 49(4), 103950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bromiley, P., & Rau, D. (2016). Operations management and the resource based view: Another view. Journal of Operations Management, 41, 95-106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Buyl, T., Boone, C., Hendriks, W., & Matthyssens, P. (2011). Top management team functional diversity and firm performance: The moderating role of CEO characteristics. Journal of Management studies, 48(1), 151-177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Campbell, R. J., Jeong, S.-H., & Graffin, S. D. (2019). Born to take risk? The effect of CEO birth order on strategic risk taking. Academy of Management Journal, 62(4), 1278–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Carpenter, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of management journal, 44(3), 533-545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cerqueti, R., Lucarelli, C., Marinelli, N., & Micozzi, A. (2020). Teams in new ventures: gender, human capital and motivation. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 12(2), 145-171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cox, T.H., Jr. (1993). Cultural diversity in organisations: Theory, research and practice. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. [Google Scholar]
  24. Crabtree, A. D., & DeBusk, G. K. (2008). The effects of adopting the balanced scorecard on shareholder returns. Advances in Accounting, 24(1), 8-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic literature, 47(2), 448-474. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
  26. Dalton, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2005). Boards of directors: Utilising empirical evidence in developing practical prescriptions. British Journal of management, 16, S91-S97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Darmadi, S. (2011). Board diversity and firm performance: The Indonesian evidence. Corporate ownership and control, 8,(2-4), 450-466. [Google Scholar]
  28. Darmadi, S. (2013). Do women in top management affect firm performance? Evidence from Indonesia. Corporate Governance, 13(3), 288-304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Díaz-Fernández, M. C., González-Rodríguez, M. R., & Simonetti, B. (2020). Top management team diversity and high performance: An integrative approach based on upper echelons and complexity theory. European Management Journal, 38(1), 157-168. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
  30. Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate governance: An international review, 11(2), 102-111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fernández-Temprano, M. A., & Tejerina-Gaite, F. (2020). Types of director, board diversity and firm performance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(2), 324-342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fernando, G. D., Jain, S. S., & Tripathy, A. (2020). This cloud has a silver lining: Gender diversity, managerial ability, and firm performance. Journal of business research, 117, 484-496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Firk, S., Richter, S., & Wolff, M. (2021). Does value-based management facilitate managerial decision-making? An analysis of divestiture decisions. Management Accounting Research, 51, 100736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Forbes, D. P. (2005). Managerial determinants of decision speed in new ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 26(4), 355-366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Foss, N., Lee, P. M., Murtinu, S., & Scalera, V. G. (2022). The XX factor: Female managers and innovation in a cross-country setting. The Leadership Quarterly, 33(3), 101537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Frijns, B., Dodd, O., & Cimerova, H. (2016). The impact of cultural diversity in corporate boards on firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 41, 521-541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gaio, L., Lucas, A. C., Poker, J. H., & Belli, M. (2024). Gender diversity in management and corporate financial performance: A systematic literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Galbreath, J. (2018). Do boards of directors influence corporate sustainable development? An attention‐based analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(6), 742-756. [Google Scholar] [Google Scholar]
  39. García-Lillo, F., Claver-Cortes, E., Ubeda-Garcia, M., Marco-Lajara, B., & Zaragoza-Sáez, P. C. (2018). Mapping the “intellectual structure” of research on human resources in the “tourism and hospitality management scientific domain” Reviewing the field and shedding light on future directions. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(3), 1741-1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gillen, N., & Cheshire, D. (2015). Innovation in fit-outs–are Generation Y and technology firms heralding a new trend?. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 33(5), 465-473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Goergen, M., Limbach, P., & Scholz, M. (2015). Mind the gap: The age dissimilarity between the chair and the CEO. Journal of Corporate Finance, 35, 136-158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Palich, L. E. (1997). Cultural diversity and the performance of multinational firms. Journal of international business studies, 28(2), 309-335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hamadamin, H. H., & Atan, T. (2019). The Impact of Strategic Human Resource Management Practices on Competitive Advantage Sustainability: The Mediation of Human Capital Development and Employee Commitment. Sustainability. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of management review, 32(2), 334-343. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
  45. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organisation as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of management review, 9(2), 193-206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Harjoto, M. A., Laksmana, I., & Lee, R. (2015). The impact of demographic characteristics of CEOs and directors on audit fees and audit delay. Managerial Auditing Journal, 30(8/9), 963-997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hemmert, M., Cho, C., & Lee, J. Y. (2022). Enhancing innovation through gender diversity: A two-country study of top management teams. European Journal of Innovation Management. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organisation: do American theories apply abroad? Organisational dynamics, 9(1), 42-63. [Google Scholar]
  49. Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5): sage. [Google Scholar]
  50. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions and organisations across nations: Sage publications. [Google Scholar]
  51. Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1984). Hofstede’s culture dimensions: An independent validation using Rokeach’s value survey. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 15(4), 417-433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Homberg, F., & Bui, H. T. M. (2013). Top Management Team Diversity: A Systematic Review. Group & Organisation Management, 38(4), 455-479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hooghiemstra, R., Hermes, N., Oxelheim, L., & Randøy, T. (2019). Strangers on the board: The impact of board internationalisation on earnings management of Nordic firms. International Business Review, 28(1), 119-134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Huckman, R. S., Staats, B. R., & Upton, D. M. (2009). Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: Evidence from Indian software services. Management science, 55(1), 85-100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jeong, S. H., & Harrison, D. A. (2017). Glass breaking, strategy making, and value creating: Meta-analytic outcomes of women as CEOs and TMT members. Academy of Management Journal, 60(4), 1219-1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jukka, T. (2020). Top management team demography and firm operating performance: A path analysis. Journal of Strategy and Management. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kagzi, M., & Guha, M. (2018). Does board demographic diversity influence firm performance? Evidence from Indian-knowledge intensive firms. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(3), 1028-1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kanchanabha, B., & Badir, Y. (2021). Top management Team’s cognitive diversity and the Firm’s ambidextrous innovation capability: The mediating role of ambivalent interpretation. Technology in Society, 64, 101499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Katsiampa, P., McGuinness, P., & Zhang, H. (2023). The role of board age diversity in the performance of publicly listed Fintech entities. The European Journal of Finance, 30, 1295–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kyaw, K., Olugbode, M., & Petracci, B. (2017). Can board gender diversity promote corporate social performance?. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 17(5), 789-802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lakshman, C., & Gonzalez, J. (2023). From TMT multiculturalism to strategic agility: business model innovation in MNEs. Multinational Business Review, 31(2), 157-175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lee, H. U., & Park, J. H. (2006). Top team diversity, internationalisation and the mediating effect of international alliances. British Journal of Management, 17(3), 195-213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Leroy, H., Buengeler, C., Veestraeten, M., Shemla, M., & Hoever, I. (2021). Fostering Team Creativity Through Team-Focused Inclusion: The Role of Leader Harvesting the Benefits of Diversity and Cultivating Value-In-Diversity Beliefs. Group & Organisation Management, 47, 798–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, J., Chu, C. W. L., Lam, K. C., & Liao, S. (2011). Age diversity and firm performance in an emerging economy: Implications for cross‐cultural human resource management. Human Resource Management, 50(2), 247-270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Li, L., Tang, W., Zhou, H., & Yang, S.-H. (2024). Digitalisation and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Top Management Team Attributes. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 6595–6605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, P.-Y., & Lo, F.-Y. (2017). Top management teams’ managerial resources and international diversification: The evidence under an uncertain environment. Management Decision, 55(9), 1999-2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Li, Y., Gong, Y., Burmeister, A., Wang, M., Alterman, V., Alonso, A., & Robinson, S. (2020). Leveraging age diversity for organisational performance: An intellectual capital perspective. The Journal of Applied Psychology. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liu, B., & Zhang, D. (2024). Functional Background Diversity of Top Management Team and Managerial Forecasting Capability. Journal of Management Accounting Research. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Marlow, S. L., Lacerenza, C. N., Paoletti, J., Burke, C. S., & Salas, E. (2018). Does team communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach?: A meta-analysis of team communication and performance. Organisational behaviour and human decision processes, 144, 145-170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Martínez‐Ferrero, J., Lozano, M. B., & Vivas, M. (2021). The impact of board cultural diversity on a firm’s commitment toward the sustainability issues of emerging countries: The mediating effect of a CSR committee. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 675-685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Martínez‐León, I., Olmedo-Cifuentes, I., Martínez-Victoria, Mc., & Arcas‐Lario, N. (2020). Leadership Style and Gender: A Study of Spanish Cooperatives. Sustainability. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mitchell, R., Boyle, B., & Nicholas, S. (2020). The interactive influence of human and social capital on capability development: The role of managerial diversity and ties in adaptive capability. Personnel Review. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Mohamed, E. B., Garoui, N., & Naoui, K. (2020). Do optimistic managers destroy firm value? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Nielsen, B. B., & Nielsen, S. (2013). Top management team nationality diversity and firm performance: A multilevel study. Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), 373-382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Oketch, J. O., & Kilika, J. M. (2017). Linking Top Management Team Characteristics and Strategy Execution with Firm Performance. A Review of Literature. The International Journal of Business and Management, 5(1), 74, 81. [Google Scholar]
  76. O’Reilly III, C. A., Caldwell, D. F., & Barnett, W. P. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative science quarterly, 21-37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. O’Reilly, C. A. III, Williams, K. Y., & Barsade, S. (1998). Group demography and innovation: Does diversity help? In D. H Gruenfeld (Ed.), Composition, 183–207. [Google Scholar]
  78. Ozdemir, O., & Erkmen, E. (2022). Top management team gender diversity and firm risk-taking in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Post, C., & Byron, K. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of management Journal, 58(5), 1546-1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Post, C., Lokshin, B., & Boone, C. (2022). What changes after women enter top management teams? A gender-based model of strategic renewal. Academy of Management Journal, 65(1), 273-303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Pytlovany, A. C., & Truxillo, D. M. (2015). Age diversity at work. Encyclopedia of geropsychology, 1, 1-8. [Google Scholar]
  82. Robbins, S. P., Judge, T. A., & Millett, B. (2015). OB: the essentials. Pearson Higher Education AU. [Google Scholar]
  83. Russen, M., Dawson, M., & Madera, J. M. (2021). Gender diversity in hospitality and tourism top management teams: A systematic review of the last 10 years. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 95, 102942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Saroj, S., Shastri, R. K., Singh, P., Tripathi, M. A., Dutta, S., & Chaubey, A. (2024). In what ways does human capital influence the relationship between financial development and economic growth?. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 31(4), 1073-1091. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
  85. Schmid, S., & Dauth, T. (2014). Does internationalisation make a difference? Stock market reaction to announcements of international top executive appointments. Journal of World Business, 49(1), 63-77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Shao, L., Kwok, C. C., & Guedhami, O. (2010). National culture and dividend policy. Journal of international business studies, 41(8), 1391-1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Shen, W., & Joseph, D. L. (2021). Gender and leadership: A criterion-focused review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 31(2), 100765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Holcombe Ehrhart, K., & Singh, G. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of management, 37(4), 1262-1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Shrader, R., & Siegel, D. S. (2007). Assessing the relationship between human capital and firm performance: Evidence from technology–based new ventures. Entrepreneurship theory and Practice, 31(6), 893-908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sidle, C. (2007). The five intelligences of leadership. Leader to leader, 2007(43), 19-25. [Google Scholar]
  91. Song, H. J., Yoon, Y. N., & Kang, K. H. (2020). The relationship between board diversity and firm performance in the lodging industry: The moderating role of internationalisation. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 86, 102461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Su, Y., Fan, D., & Rao-Nicholson, R. (2019). Internationalisation of Chinese banking and financial institutions: A fuzzy-set analysis of the leader-TMT dynamics. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(14), 2137–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Syakhroza, A., Diyanty, V., & Dewo, S. A. (2021). Top management team (TMT) age diversity and firm performance: the moderating role of the effectiveness of TMT meetings. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 27(5/6), 486-503. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
  94. Tang, S., Nadkarni, S., Wei, L., & Zhang, S. X. (2021). Balancing the yin and yang: TMT gender diversity, psychological safety, and firm ambidextrous strategic orientation in Chinese high-tech SMEs. Academy of Management Journal, 64(5), 1578-1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Tanikawa, T., Kim, S., & Jung, Y. (2017). Top management team diversity and firm performance: exploring a function of age. Team Performance Management, 23(3/4), 156-170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Tihanyi, L., Ellstrand, A. E., Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2000). Composition of the top management team and firm international diversification. Journal of management, 26(6), 1157-1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Tshetshema, C., & Chan, K. (2020). A systematic literature review of the relationship between demographic diversity and innovation performance at team-level. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32, 955–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Van Knippenberg, D., & Van Ginkel, W. P. (2010). The categorisation‐elaboration model of work group diversity: Wielding the double‐edged sword. The psychology of social and cultural diversity, 255-280. [Google Scholar]
  99. Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. Journal of applied psychology, 89(6), 1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Varrone, N., D’Angelo, E. D., Gangi, F., & Daniele, L. M. (2020). Does cultural diversity of board of directors affect corporate environmental performance? Evidence from the energy sector. European Scientific Journal, 16(28). [Google Scholar]
  101. Velte, P. (2016). Women on management board and ESG performance. Journal of Global Responsibility, 7(1), 98-109. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
  102. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5(2), 171-180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management journal, 35(1), 91-121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Winterton, J., & Cafferkey, K. (2019). Revisiting human capital theory: Progress and prospects. Elgar Introduction to Theories of Human Resources and Employment Relations, 218–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Xie, J., Nozawa, W., & Managi, S. (2020). The role of women on boards in corporate environmental strategy and financial performance: A global outlook. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5), 2044-2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Xu, J., Yun, K., Yan, F., Jang, P., Kim, J., & Pang, C. (2019). A study on the effect of TMT characteristics and vertical dyad similarity on enterprise achievements. Sustainability, 11(10), 2913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Xue, Y., Fan, Y., & Xie, X. (2020). Relation between senior managers’ safety leadership and safety behavior in the Chinese petrochemical industry. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 65, 104142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Yeoh, S.-B., & Hooy, C. (2020). CEO age and risk-taking of family business in Malaysia: The inverse S-curve relationship. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 39, 273–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ying, Q., Hassan, H., & Ahmad, H. (2019). The Role of a Manager’s Intangible Capabilities in Resource Acquisition and Sustainable Competitive Performance. Sustainability. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zhang, T., Liu, F.-C., Gao, B., & Yen, D. (2020). Top management team social interaction and conservative reporting decision: A language style matching approach. Support Syst., 142, 113469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

View articles in other formats

License

ccby This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Coyright

Copyright (c) 2024 The Author(s).

Published by Sumy State University

Issue

Контакти

Сумський державний університет 
вул. Харківська, 116,
м. Суми, Україна, 40007

e-mail: mmi@fem.sumdu.edu.ua

Про нас

Про видавця та засновника – Сумський державний університет

Історія журналу

Маркетинг та реклама

Follow us

LinkedIn

Twitter

 

Company 2023 © Sumy State University